Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Is the Hillary loyalty pledge real? [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)30. "Hillary loyalty pledge backfires at Millennial-focused event"
Hillary loyalty pledge backfires at Millennial-focused event
http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=6784
Hillary misses mark with millennials
Clinton spoke for 30 minutes on voter suppression, gun control, women's reproductive rights; she called Republicans terrorists and championed foster care. The only time she caught the audience's attention was with a brief mention of college affordability.
It was as if time had passed her by.
This trip was billed as a grassroots support mechanism, with every attendee required to sign a pledge of support before entering the field.
What it showed was a campaign staff that is underachieving at best or failing their candidate at worst, and a candidate trapped by that staff's arrogance and her own insecurity as a campaigner.
Yet, despite standing in all of this political quicksand, Clinton remains the favorite among her party's elite.
Bellwethers are funny things; pretty much anyone can make the argument that an event, a state, a gathering or a moment is a microcosm of larger events, and pretty much they'd be wrong.
Is what happened in Cleveland also happening at other Clinton events? If so, it is a peek into one of the least talked about aspects of populism: not showing up to vote.
If voters are angry, uninspired, tired of the status quo, and not buying their party's nominee, they usually throw up their hands and stay home.
That is a prospect strategists and reporters often miss, but it could be a very real possibility in 2016 for both parties.
http://triblive.com/opinion/salena/9029352-74/clinton-ohio-audience
Clinton spoke for 30 minutes on voter suppression, gun control, women's reproductive rights; she called Republicans terrorists and championed foster care. The only time she caught the audience's attention was with a brief mention of college affordability.
It was as if time had passed her by.
This trip was billed as a grassroots support mechanism, with every attendee required to sign a pledge of support before entering the field.
What it showed was a campaign staff that is underachieving at best or failing their candidate at worst, and a candidate trapped by that staff's arrogance and her own insecurity as a campaigner.
Yet, despite standing in all of this political quicksand, Clinton remains the favorite among her party's elite.
Bellwethers are funny things; pretty much anyone can make the argument that an event, a state, a gathering or a moment is a microcosm of larger events, and pretty much they'd be wrong.
Is what happened in Cleveland also happening at other Clinton events? If so, it is a peek into one of the least talked about aspects of populism: not showing up to vote.
If voters are angry, uninspired, tired of the status quo, and not buying their party's nominee, they usually throw up their hands and stay home.
That is a prospect strategists and reporters often miss, but it could be a very real possibility in 2016 for both parties.
http://triblive.com/opinion/salena/9029352-74/clinton-ohio-audience
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I wouldn't think so. There would be no better way to turn Democrats off a candidate
Autumn
Sep 2015
#1
not showing up to vote is a real possibility. Only the party establishment won't see it as
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2015
#35
the image the OP is the exact same one from your link--folds with the blotch on it.
riversedge
Sep 2015
#40
Yes, but there are much better ways to get the names & email, like simply asking for them
peacebird
Sep 2015
#11
I remember Democrats being furious when Norquist did this. All of a sudden it's okay because
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2015
#38