Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Polls are beginning to turn Hillary's way. [View all]DCBob
(24,689 posts)68. Filling arenas is not necessarily indicative of political success.
Don't forget the Ron Paul phenomenon in 2008 and 2012. His supporters packed arenas and were the most aggressive and dedicated out there but in the end it was just a footnote in the political history books.
I see Bernie ending up much the same way.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not crazy but confused because the latter half of Sept and early Oct haven't occured yet.
DCBob
Sep 2015
#109
Thank you for posting this. I am still not sure why Biden is included as a matter of course.
Persondem
Sep 2015
#2
Do you not understand what happened in 2007-2008 is not relevant to the current situation??
DCBob
Sep 2015
#7
Well, the last one did, but it's also has no statisticall difference from that 7 point lead
jfern
Sep 2015
#33
Can we all agree that CBS should have been embarrassed to release that dreck.
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#49
Well +22 Sanders did drop a few jaws I think... even some of his supporters questioned that.
kenn3d
Sep 2015
#93
If I was accumulating polling data I would include it as to not poison my sample.
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#100
That's some hype for Ron Paul there. His largest crowd was on campus at UCLA, 7,000.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2015
#73
After what happened in 2008, I can assure you Hillary is definitely not taking anything for granted.
DCBob
Sep 2015
#67
if you look closely at the polling trend line it indicates this started a couple of weeks ago.
DCBob
Sep 2015
#15
If Sanders is gaining only 0.3 points in a totally cherry-picked 9 days, he's doing fine
jfern
Sep 2015
#37
It's also sloppy social science to willy nilly ignore polls you made the subjective determination...
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#42
The problem is when you start cherry picking polls you are introducing bias into your averages.
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#62
When you condense the date range to two weeks out of a 6 month campaign . . . you are pretty
Ed Suspicious
Sep 2015
#80
As time passes and more information comes out on the candidates stand on the issues it will become
Thinkingabout
Sep 2015
#38
ah, so the undemocratic practice of having no debates, and having a super PAC launch
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2015
#66
the one-day "trend" (pretend-trend?) has already reversed since Huffpost updated their chart from .
magical thyme
Sep 2015
#98
odd....I see them at 45:26 today. also, if you're going to use the term "flatlining" you may want to
magical thyme
Sep 2015
#97