2016 Postmortem

CentralMass

(16,973 posts)

31. It's clear that the party wants to limit debate

Reply to DanTex (Original post)

Sun Sep 20, 2015, 11:58 AM

Sep 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

81 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The debate outrage is pretty silly. [View all] DanTex Sep 2015 OP

I agree.... BooScout Sep 2015 #1

That's right, Boo, you are a turd way Democrat! leftofcool Sep 2015 #3

I'm crushed... BooScout Sep 2015 #9

I would definitely start a petition. I will sign it. leftofcool Sep 2015 #16

I believe the phrase for a 99%er who doesn't support Sanders is "idiot"... brooklynite Sep 2015 #65

Some are laying the ground work for oasis Sep 2015 #2

I have seen that. leftofcool Sep 2015 #4

There's no telling when it will stop after Hill gets the nod. oasis Sep 2015 #5

There is no telling what the excuses will be upaloopa Sep 2015 #62

DWS will be Cheney and Rove rolled into one. Sad, so sad. <nt> oasis Sep 2015 #63

In 2008, Hillary called for more debates when there were already 18 and got 26 jfern Sep 2015 #45

Hypocrisy Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #54

Wasn't there many more candidates? yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #61

There were 8 Alittleliberal Sep 2015 #69

I will ask questions that I sincerely doubt I will receive TM99 Sep 2015 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Sep 2015 #8

Have you consistently believed this way about the debates in the past? TM99 Sep 2015 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Sep 2015 #13

I hope to achieve more time to debate TM99 Sep 2015 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Sep 2015 #21

Reflect on this please. TM99 Sep 2015 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Sep 2015 #25

The exclusivity clause drmeow Sep 2015 #44

Me too Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #56

I am pissed off as well. TM99 Sep 2015 #81

I don't think BS supporters advocate more and sooner debates to "take HRC down" Blus4u Sep 2015 #57

I thought I made it clear that I don't care how many debates there are. DanTex Sep 2015 #11

If you don't care, and you think it is no big deal TM99 Sep 2015 #15

Because DanTex hates Sanders, and anyone who supports Sanders Scootaloo Sep 2015 #27

How many times have I said that I like Sanders now? I even made an OP about it recently. DanTex Sep 2015 #33

Actions speak louder than words, don't you think? Scootaloo Sep 2015 #34

An odd statement, given that all you know me by are my words. DanTex Sep 2015 #35

...yeah, the adage doesn't work too well in a medium like this, I suppose Scootaloo Sep 2015 #37

I display hatred? By continually saying I like him and posting an OP that says that Hillary DanTex Sep 2015 #38

Bouncy, bouncy. Hortensis Sep 2015 #42

The Bernistas hate DanTex because redstateblues Sep 2015 #53

Hi, RSB. Dan Tex is someone I look for when reading. Yes, keep it up. Hortensis Sep 2015 #80

I like Hillary. She would make a great political science professor. I just think she can't win the Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #76

It seems to expand to fill empty time. Hortensis Sep 2015 #40

2004 DNC Chair, Terry McAuiffe scheduled 6 debates. He recently said oasis Sep 2015 #12

Those were officially sanctioned debates. TM99 Sep 2015 #17

And Dems lost to an unpopular moron. HooptieWagon Sep 2015 #23

John Kerry, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark, John Edwards, oasis Sep 2015 #49

Nice deflection. TM99 Sep 2015 #78

Irony is... Chan790 Sep 2015 #36

/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba Sep 2015 #41

Apparently at least some of Hillary's supporters believe that she's wrong on this issue or Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #43

Can I suggest that there's a difference between... brooklynite Sep 2015 #66

It pretty much functions the same way. Either way we end up with a limited, untimely debate Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #77

Two vice-chairs of the DNC disagree Mnpaul Sep 2015 #7

I remember the debates from summer 2007 and how little attention people were paying to them. We Metric System Sep 2015 #18

This Talking Point brought to you by Terry McAullife. morningfog Sep 2015 #19

If we have more debates, folks will then complain they are held by MSM and Hoyt Sep 2015 #20

so very true treestar Sep 2015 #29

It's not that people wanting more debates expect all people to watch all debates. Lucky Luciano Sep 2015 #24

the outrage is the exclusivity clause and the iron fisted control virtualobserver Sep 2015 #26

True. The Rs have so many contenders treestar Sep 2015 #28

Silly if you support Hillary Clinton, for sure. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #30

It's clear that the party wants to limit debate CentralMass Sep 2015 #31

I agree (nt) bigwillq Sep 2015 #32

The number of debates doesn't bother me. The timing does, a lot. Scuba Sep 2015 #39

Overall I agree. NCTraveler Sep 2015 #46

Spot on correct. I've been saying several of the same things. It's a bunch of nonsense. RBInMaine Sep 2015 #47

As a Sanders supporter, I agree that we don't need more debates EvolveOrConvolve Sep 2015 #48

Really? Silly? No. This is a form of voter disenfranchisement, plain and simple MindfulOne Sep 2015 #50

Debates= bogus, staged, pre-programmed? leftofcool Sep 2015 #67

Yep jberryhill Sep 2015 #51

More might be better HassleCat Sep 2015 #52

This is a form of the esoteric way Hillary and her henchman operate, and is a Republican tactic, not orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #55

There were 8 debates for Gore & Bradley.... Historic NY Sep 2015 #58

Gore was the "establishment" candidate and Bradley was the renegade... brooklynite Sep 2015 #71

I've noticed that Bernie Sanders isn't nearly as "outraged" as his supporters here... brooklynite Sep 2015 #59

He does'nt have to go negative . TheFarS1de Sep 2015 #64

Bernie is running on only one thing. Economics and how to get rid of a million billionaires leftofcool Sep 2015 #68

Of course . TheFarS1de Sep 2015 #73

I wouldn't have a problem with more debates dsc Sep 2015 #60

It really is. Aerows Sep 2015 #70

i think there should be earlier debates, but the whole thing about Hillary being the reason for JI7 Sep 2015 #72

How did that turn out for her? 840high Sep 2015 #74

she was able to keep it competitive longer than she would have without the debates JI7 Sep 2015 #75

She isn't trying to gain ground on anyone, she's fighting to stop losing ground. I do not believe Ed Suspicious Sep 2015 #79