Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: It is unlikely that either Sanders or Trump will win the nominations. [View all]orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)210. No you tried to hide me 7-0 , ANALYZE THAT.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
218 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is unlikely that either Sanders or Trump will win the nominations. [View all]
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
OP
His ploy is to hand of to Jeb, and be thought of lovingly by Republicans, and that's all it ever was
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#4
The long arm of the 1% has no boundries, his supporters are Republicans and will turn on a dime, He
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#191
Yup. Silver agrees that neither Sanders nor Trump will be nominated, and I agree for many of the
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#5
Just keep thinking in the Box, and the TPP will hold the next elections at McDonald's.
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#2
I asked for thoughtful analysis, not nonsense. Either offer substance or please stay away.
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#3
People like yourself should stop with the K-Street shit and connect the dots, and start having some
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#6
Well, the OP did not cite any probablilities or polls, just the Op's own pronouncements.
merrily
Sep 2015
#16
I am thankful for Bernie. If he does not get the nom he will have brought up
LiberalArkie
Sep 2015
#79
Yes, it's been since May at least. The earliest flurry I saw prompted me to post this
merrily
Sep 2015
#141
I would like substantive comments. Do you have anything at all to offer, or just shouting?
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#15
You're way too generous, more of a pft. And I think that's too "substantive".
marble falls
Sep 2015
#67
Authoritarian much? You get to post the OP. Everyone else gets to reply as they wish, as
merrily
Sep 2015
#11
Bernie Sanders wants substance, not just rants and raves. I am emulating Sanders. Is that ok?
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#18
I am asking for substance around explaining how Sanders can win. Bernie wants substantive
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#39
I replied to that twice already. No one owes you more substance than appeared in your OP, namely 0.
merrily
Sep 2015
#43
The gen-X'ers and Millers that put Obama in office (twice) and will vote for Sanders
Volaris
Sep 2015
#77
Now your Morphing like Hillary, " I'm Bernie Sanders " , it never stops with" YOU " people .
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#25
Saying "we all know a self-avowed Socialist cannot win" is not thoughtful or reasonable.
highprincipleswork
Sep 2015
#168
I don't see "doom and gloom" and never said anything to indicate that. Otherwise, THANKS for a
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#26
Eric Cantor lead greatly in funding (5.6M v. 206K) and was up by double-digits in the polls.
SMC22307
Sep 2015
#148
Thanks. That's some appreciated substance, but I think you are too stuck on the negatives.
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#31
A " Life Time " when she was working for Barry Goldwater ? Do yourself a favor study history, before
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#42
History is full of unexpected results. We won't achieve them if we never try. Give Bernie a chance.
reformist2
Sep 2015
#56
Sanders has a better chance of winning the general than Hillary and I will prove that the exact
merrily
Sep 2015
#9
The only negative thing said publicly about Bernie are from Hillary supporters, I believe there are
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#17
And thanks to Citizens United, Hillary gets to raise as much dark money as she wants & smear Sanders
merrily
Sep 2015
#24
Both sides of the fence is her Forte, always befriending the other side, look at how she dealt with
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#44
Please offer some explanation of HOW a "socialist" can win the American general election.
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#33
Have you ever thought about changing your DU name? :) I do not think
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2015
#71
I think the only way Bernie could have a decent chance to win is by Trump being the GOP nominee.
DCBob
Sep 2015
#14
LOL, she loses by somewhat less than a man who, prior to June had almost no name recognition, when
merrily
Sep 2015
#118
I agree. A self described "socialist" can not win the American general election.
RBInMaine
Sep 2015
#34
Pathetic but true, all good points, I will continue to do all I can for what you aptly put a
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#40
How does that get her off being accused of socialism if we Berniacs support her?
rogerashton
Sep 2015
#200
Hillary cannot win in the general. The more people see her, the less they like or trust her
peacebird
Sep 2015
#110
Agree. I think he started off for publicity, but his bigoted immigrant comments got
Hoyt
Sep 2015
#149
What would Donald Trump do which would be a big deal to moneyed interests?
Eric J in MN
Sep 2015
#89
You're asking for thoughtful and detailed analysis for the position you are against.
freedom fighter jh
Sep 2015
#70
We all know that a self described "Catholic" can not win the general election. Until JFK. We all
Attorney in Texas
Sep 2015
#92
A Socialist won the presidency in 1932, 1936, 1940, and 1944. As to your two questions:
Attorney in Texas
Sep 2015
#144
One question is whether Sanders LOSES any votes because of the "socialist" label
Jim Lane
Sep 2015
#153
Considering that half the potential electorate has been so ignored that they haven't bothered ...
Scuba
Sep 2015
#173
I do not know that "a self described 'socialist' can not win the general election."
David__77
Sep 2015
#202