2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Yeah... I Know... It's A Conservative Paper... But I Have To Agree Here: [View all]Rilgin
(796 posts)Yes exactly what I said. You allege that any democrat that is concerned over HRC electability is a right wing troll or a conduit for right wing meme. You do not look at her just blame the RW and attack anyone who looks at her issues on their face. Rather slippery of you.
With regard to my first paragraph it would have been better said by using the word "flawed" rather than "failed". One of her flaws is its already been proved in 2008 that she does not excite the base and can lose an election that she was considered a lock to win. In this way she is a failed candidate but "flawed" is a better word.
I ask you again to forget her name and gender and look at her history, positions and unfavorability. She has big problems in the democratic base. How obvious does that be to have you acknowledge this. The rise of Bernie from unknown to front runner in the first two states should tell you everything.
There are serious issues from the democratic side over her electability. You trying to say everyone who tries to point this out on a democratic site during the primaries is echoing right wing memes does not change the facts.
If your main issue is avoiding a republican win, you should be doing everything you can to avoid HRC continuing to run and win the primary.