2016 Postmortem

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,879 posts)

70. NO, David Kendall is too smart to jeopardize his law degree.

Wed Sep 23, 2015, 08:36 AM

Sep 2015

NO, David Kendall is too smart to jeopardize his law degree. He is one of the most prominent attorneys in Washington, DC.

Also, he isn't one who sorted the e-mails. Another attorney did.

Not you, but a lot of the people on this board talk out of their you know where. If it is found David Kendall did anything wrong in this instance I will literally eat my computer and put it on youtube.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: FBI RECOVERS HILLARY'S DELETED EMAILS [View all] Halliburton Sep 2015 OP

BHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA leftofcool Sep 2015 #1

Let's see how long this is funny to you in about a month! Nt Logical Sep 2015 #42

It will still be funny I assure you. leftofcool Sep 2015 #57

It is a bad deal that will turn worse, true or not, how you think it is funny is sick. Nt Logical Sep 2015 #108

My company does this sort of work all the time. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #2

I read that also. So some of them were work related. jwirr Sep 2015 #5

So she attempted to withhold those work related email. leveymg Sep 2015 #15

Not necessarily - the emails may be ALL the emails including those sent to the State Department karynnj Sep 2015 #33

One of the posters stated that this was merely a description jwirr Sep 2015 #36

A mistake. It was solely her personal decision. delrem Sep 2015 #54

If the FBI determines that the "private" (erased) email contains gov't info, her campaign is toast. leveymg Sep 2015 #61

Exactly. jwirr Sep 2015 #109

You do know these stories do nothing for Bernie? Tommy2Tone Sep 2015 #6

You do know I don't give a flying flip about your opinion, don't you? Fawke Em Sep 2015 #11

Fair enough Tommy2Tone Sep 2015 #23

You mean defending myself from your jab? Fawke Em Sep 2015 #25

LOL Yep, they deserve each other. nt Live and Learn Sep 2015 #52

My boyfriend also works in IT jkbRN Sep 2015 #115

For a guy who's "toast" he sure does have quite the following....LOL....n/t monmouth4 Sep 2015 #13

Deflect much? Yours is the first post on the thread that has nothing to do with the OP, merrily Sep 2015 #63

They could be "work-related" along the lines of "can we bump up Friday's meeting to Thursday?" winter is coming Sep 2015 #10

You may be right about that. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #16

if *all* the emails were deleted, then all were restored, in which case they need to sort through magical thyme Sep 2015 #18

although the server company said *they* never wiped the computer, her lawyer magical thyme Sep 2015 #24

it depends upon the definition of "work-related". :-) nt antigop Sep 2015 #32

That doesnt mean what you hoped it did moobu2 Sep 2015 #44

It might. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #47

Wrong. moobu2 Sep 2015 #60

Precisely DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #68

What????? Lychee2 Sep 2015 #112

Madame or sir, I believe you are confused. Let me see if I can help you. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #121

Apparently she didn't. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #96

Exactly. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #114

You have misstated the facts. Lychee2 Sep 2015 #110

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zappaman Sep 2015 #3

No kidding Tommy2Tone Sep 2015 #7

... zappaman Sep 2015 #12

The FBI isn't just "Bernie fans". Or do you think it is? nt MH1 Sep 2015 #82

Actually... kenfrequed Sep 2015 #104

Yes, wonder why they are wasting time on this treestar Sep 2015 #116

The OP title should be "FBI MIGHT recover Hillary's deleted emails" Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #4

Well, this is confusing. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #9

it's in future tense. Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #20

I'm speaking of the second part of the sentence. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #26

Wow dude... "have been is still future"? Srsly? "Will be" is future. It's called English. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #29

"Have (been")+ past participle = present perfect tense Art_from_Ark Sep 2015 #37

Thank you for the grammar lesson :) MH1 Sep 2015 #83

I have studied foreign languages for 40+ years Art_from_Ark Sep 2015 #91

"The FBI has recovered personal and work-related e-mails from the private computer server..." cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #17

without proof or attribution Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #22

Damn, there was a goalpost here a moment ago... cherokeeprogressive Sep 2015 #28

someplace where facts matter? Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #30

opening paragraph of the article says they have been recovered. magical thyme Sep 2015 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Sep 2015 #31

In other news, Clinton increased her lead over Senator Sanders this week... wyldwolf Sep 2015 #8

Like Bernie fans have sooooo much sway over what and when Fawke Em Sep 2015 #14

In other news, the media is in the bag for Sanders... Autumn Sep 2015 #19

Right so..... workinclasszero Sep 2015 #39

The FBI is involved with the republicans? yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #50

This should help her Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #27

agreed, H> supporters should be pleased their champion can be cleared HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #34

The FBI may find other interesting emails which aren't work related. morningfog Sep 2015 #35

There it is. RiverLover Sep 2015 #40

Over long said I have no idea what's in the emails and morningfog Sep 2015 #41

Here: Lychee2 Sep 2015 #48

Post removed Post removed Sep 2015 #38

Pretty bad hide tritsofme Sep 2015 #43

The poster compared all Sanders supporters to. GOP committee. Of course it was a good hide. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #49

I know! Such an insult against the Benghazi committee! MannyGoldstein Sep 2015 #58

The ebola virus IS a Bernie supporter. merrily Sep 2015 #64

+1...nt SidDithers Sep 2015 #62

Bad hide, my ass. Sanders is a candidate for the Democratic nomination and most of his supporters merrily Sep 2015 #65

Get with the program. Puglover Sep 2015 #69

Silenced from broadbrush smears of supporters of a Democratic candidate and a majority of DUers? merrily Sep 2015 #72

Whoops Puglover Sep 2015 #73

No, no I got you. But maybe I should have included it. merrily Sep 2015 #74

Good. Puglover Sep 2015 #75

Yep, should have been 7-0 to hide that crap, not 4-3. nt MH1 Sep 2015 #86

considering who the single biggest beneficiary of Citizens United is, and who is running with zero magical thyme Sep 2015 #97

Well, this could get interesting. TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #45

My only worry is there on a fishing expedition like Ken Starr bigdarryl Sep 2015 #46

It was clinton's lawyer david kendall who has a security clearance, sorted the emails. BlueStateLib Sep 2015 #51

Men and women make decisions and take actions TM99 Sep 2015 #53

Classified information was mishandled. This could just be a side distraction to Skwmom Sep 2015 #66

He can't jeopardize his law degree, but he can jeopardize his ticket to practice law in one merrily Sep 2015 #67

NO, David Kendall is too smart to jeopardize his law degree. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #70

How very odd. You used the identical, yet nonsensical, wording that BlueStateLib used merrily Sep 2015 #76

You and your associates suggested David Kendall has jeopardized his ability to practice law. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #77

My associates? WTF? Maybe you should look up that word. Also look up "defensive." merrily Sep 2015 #78

Associates DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #79

I am associated with everyone and everything in the world then, and so are you. merrily Sep 2015 #80

degree, license, associate, homo sapien, upset, correct RiverLover Sep 2015 #81

Using a bizarre term is nothing. Two posters using the same bizarre term a couple of posts apart, merrily Sep 2015 #85

Yep. RiverLover Sep 2015 #90

LOL! merrily Sep 2015 #92

"No worries about upsetting me. It would take a lot more than a few nonsensical posts from you. " DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #84

Your posts are a plea for comity? Now, THAT's funny. merrily Sep 2015 #89

Comity DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #93

Thanks. I know the definition of comity, though. That's why your claim was so funny. merrily Sep 2015 #94

Like you I consider everybody in the world my associate as well as my friend. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #95

Cool. Then link me to the post where I suggested someone jeopardized his law degree OR his ability merrily Sep 2015 #98

I am sad that you are dismissing my pleas for comity in such harsh terms... DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #100

No link and no apology. Just more condescension and pointless wasting of my time. Got it. merrily Sep 2015 #102

I have offered my hand in friendship several times only to have it slapped DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #105

I'm not sure Kendall's having a security clearance entitled him to have access to TwilightGardener Sep 2015 #120

Benghazi!!...nt SidDithers Sep 2015 #55

I think they've only recovered some of her emails. n/t Skwmom Sep 2015 #56

Breaking news belongs in the Late Breaking News forum. Nice try, though. randome Sep 2015 #59

So they weren't "wiped" as RW media has been harping on for months. DCBob Sep 2015 #71

Well I'm sure someone dusted the server at some point. MH1 Sep 2015 #88

David Kendall is the one who said they were "wiped" magical thyme Sep 2015 #99

Can you provide a link that quotes Kendal saying the server was "wiped"? DCBob Sep 2015 #122

can't find a direct quote now. am only finding it ascribed to him. magical thyme Sep 2015 #123

It has become clear even to the ouside observer that Gowdy fucked up here. NCTraveler Sep 2015 #87

I wonder if I've written 60000 emails ever since the dawn of email treestar Sep 2015 #101

That's just about the same number as your DU posts. leveymg Sep 2015 #106

wow didn't think of that, amazing treestar Sep 2015 #107

4 years. She hooked up the server the day after she had her Senate confirmation hearing. leveymg Sep 2015 #113

HAHA! Astute observation, leveymg. nt antigop Sep 2015 #119

Why is this (and Benghazi) still a story? nt Stellar Sep 2015 #103

Investigators Find Emails Hillary Clinton Said Were Erased antigop Sep 2015 #111

Thanks for that second report - looks like we're coming up to an important announcement. n/t leveymg Sep 2015 #117

hey, it's the NY Times...you know it can't be trusted. nt antigop Sep 2015 #118