Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why did she use the word "distraction"? It's just weird and inappropriate. nt Bonobo Sep 2015 #1
Not to me. Weird has been too much passion invested in a pipe while Hortensis Sep 2015 #9
No it's purposeful. She objects to a distraction she does -not- object to the KXL. HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #11
It opens the door kenfrequed Sep 2015 #16
Yes. RiverLover Sep 2015 #2
Exactly. n/t Skwmom Sep 2015 #4
I did not catch that Duckhunter935 Sep 2015 #12
Absolutely Clintonesque. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #3
Yuppers, she gave herself an out TM99 Sep 2015 #5
Hillary is very smart. She could give straight answers, if she wanted to. Dems to Win Sep 2015 #40
Once a lawyer, TM99 Sep 2015 #41
Distraction from what? Combating climate change is largely the project of blocking pipelines. Cheese Sandwich Sep 2015 #6
Yep. What exactly is it a "distraction" FROM? That CharlotteVale Sep 2015 #7
Maybe a distraction from HRC's past role on this OR a distraction to her run for the nomination. nt karynnj Sep 2015 #26
Yes (nt) bigwillq Sep 2015 #8
weasel words, and nothing but. cali Sep 2015 #10
Weasel words and mealy-mouth disndat Sep 2015 #13
Key phrase, "unfortunate from my perspective" Divernan Sep 2015 #14
Of course. The word "distraction". NorthCarolina Sep 2015 #15
quintessential clinton-speak restorefreedom Sep 2015 #17
Translation: Were her fingers crossed? FSogol Sep 2015 #18
Ah ... the search for the secret code to Hillary's evil plan continues. JoePhilly Sep 2015 #19
She can if she wants but she and you should understand jwirr Sep 2015 #35
Yes it does... ljm2002 Sep 2015 #20
It depends on which way she evolves. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #21
It all depends..... Segami Sep 2015 #22
America's sick of these Rorschach-test statements by pols that everyone knows MisterP Sep 2015 #23
Of course. hifiguy Sep 2015 #24
You might be on to something -- I had thought the response weird - almost forced and angry that karynnj Sep 2015 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #27
No might, about it. nt Snotcicles Sep 2015 #31
She doesn't oppose because it's wrong, but because it's a "distraction" arcane1 Sep 2015 #28
The union question HassleCat Sep 2015 #29
And those Unions that build, operate and maintain are seldom jwirr Sep 2015 #37
It's Hillary. A future reversal of her position is all but guaranteed. Jester Messiah Sep 2015 #30
I'll leave it to the voters to decide what she meant. oasis Sep 2015 #32
I've spent five-minutes reading those lines again Scootaloo Sep 2015 #33
As with any politician, WHAT THEY DO is much more important than WHAT THEY SAY, Maedhros Sep 2015 #34
I hope someone asks her for more details in a debate or in a news interview. Vattel Sep 2015 #36
She's forever evolving, she'll fine her corporate voice after the election. JRLeft Sep 2015 #38
It sounds like she doesn't understand why climate activists oppose Keystone Dems to Win Sep 2015 #39
I agree Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #42
Yes. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #43
She triangulates so much, that it's hard to take anything she says seriously jfern Sep 2015 #44
Kind of reminds me of her position on new nuclear power plants. n/t Skwmom Sep 2015 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton: Does the wording...»Reply #18