Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Clinton's Decline, Clintonista Excuses [View all]cascadiance
(19,537 posts)155. If FDR were alive today who would he believe is more of a DINO...
One that stands against the "economic royalists" of our day that he so vocally stood up to when he was president, or one that takes money from them and doesn't take them on unless internal pollsters has her feeling it's OK later to comment on an issue (even if she doesn't solidly align herself on issues that would offend the corporate money of today)?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
165 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're implying that there are other states besides New Hampshire. No, there's just one!
DanTex
Sep 2015
#7
I stand corrected. No wonder they call it the "United States." Because there are two of them!
DanTex
Sep 2015
#11
Does that mean Hillary, born and raised in Illinois needs to win by 10 in Iowa?
karynnj
Sep 2015
#29
I think if that is true, then HRC needs to win the state next to her Illinois birthplace and
karynnj
Sep 2015
#138
In Pittsburgh I've met hundreds and hundreds. Canvasing you know. Talked to them actually.
Tommymac
Sep 2015
#102
That's right. Cling to your corporation-sponsored Democrat and keep the con game rolling.
EEO
Sep 2015
#79
I campaigned for Bernie yesterday. Just offered information to random people.
JDPriestly
Sep 2015
#145
She's not tanking. She started off high because she was the only one running.
BlueWaveDem
Sep 2015
#13
Untrue that she offers nothing. She offers the promise of legal-gray-area conduct,
TwilightGardener
Sep 2015
#10
Damn right she's the front-runner! Just like she was at this time in '07.
A Simple Game
Sep 2015
#30
And for some, lacking only the sense to not use politics as the main reason to vote for a war. n/t
A Simple Game
Sep 2015
#153
Bernie represents the principles of the Democratic party better than
The Velveteen Ocelot
Sep 2015
#27
Been a Democrat since I was first able to vote (for George McGovern).
The Velveteen Ocelot
Sep 2015
#83
The Clintons have worked with the Koch Brothers to take over the Democratic Party...
cascadiance
Sep 2015
#154
Because many are also beholden to banksters, and most fear retribution by a powerful
tblue37
Sep 2015
#162
I do wonder how those who harbor such animus for Madame Secretary can possibly...
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#21
Because I oppose her for the nomination, I'm logically required not to vote for her in the general?
Jim Lane
Sep 2015
#76
I'm not walking it back, and I'm not voting for her, no matter what.
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#132
It's not what she offers but what she can pay for that she's counting on.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Sep 2015
#23
I use Hillarian now. Mostly because I find it equal parts accurate and hillarious.
Ed Suspicious
Sep 2015
#152
"When"? Don't count your chickens yet. A lot can happen between now and then....
The Velveteen Ocelot
Sep 2015
#64
Pretending it's the email thing is a way to distract from the real reasons. I support the candidate
sabrina 1
Sep 2015
#77
Many in the tech community sure as hell have watched her handling of her email problem
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#140