Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Human101948

(3,457 posts)

3. Man. You are carrying water for the right wingers!

Reply to MindfulOne (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 27, 2015, 06:00 PM

Sep 2015

There is no "fuck up" other than in the imagination of the rabid right wing. You seem disappointed and angry that it wasn't Hillary's signature. Why would that be the case?

By the way, I support Bernie, but I find the attacks on Hillary on DU most curious. And if she is nominated I will vote for her. And I really don't think she is going to lose--unless Democrats like you stab the rest of us in the back.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Retraction: Hillary Clinton did NOT sign off on Huma Abedin job change [View all] portlander23 Sep 2015 OP

Where does the buck stop? MindfulOne Sep 2015 #1

Man. You are carrying water for the right wingers! Human101948 Sep 2015 #3

Why does truth make you so testy? leftynyc Sep 2015 #17

Judicial Watch has been stalking the Clintons for decades. oasis Sep 2015 #21

I knew there was more to this story. murielm99 Sep 2015 #2

didn't they just have another retraction about her? 6chars Sep 2015 #4

Will the Bernistas/Redstate/Fox apologize for jumping on this story? Dawson Leery Sep 2015 #5

such civility yourself karynnj Sep 2015 #23

Do you know what's absurd? Avalux Sep 2015 #25

Oh my! OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #6

The MSM is really showing their asses with the sloppy reporting surrounding this story. It's as if Metric System Sep 2015 #7

NEVER trust rightwing media sources. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #8

We owe Judicialwatch a debt for their FOIA work portlander23 Sep 2015 #10

I've never had a chief of staff so how does that work? HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #9

Exactly. RiverLover Sep 2015 #18

Of course it was done with her approval. TM99 Sep 2015 #26

Oh FFS ... eom GeorgeGist Sep 2015 #11

How much difference does that make? Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #12

incredibly minor detail, Huma Abedin could easily be mistaken for one of Hillary's limbs virtualobserver Sep 2015 #14

wait. Who committed a crime here? twii Sep 2015 #15

I am not saying anything like that. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #16

OMG!!! ronnykmarshall Sep 2015 #13

I think this is a totally stupid issue, but Vinca Sep 2015 #19

I am with you on this one.. artislife Sep 2015 #27

as I am sure you are aware, it is a way to keep the story going-day by day. riversedge Sep 2015 #29

How many mea culpa have the NYT now issues about their coverage of Clinton? Godhumor Sep 2015 #20

The more they screw up, the more certain people trust them twii Sep 2015 #22

Oh dear. A rogue chief of staff? No of course not, she signed it on Autumn Sep 2015 #24

If they the word Retraction in their headline like you do--thier riversedge Sep 2015 #28

Kick oasis Sep 2015 #30

Right, Hillary didn't sign it. Hillary's chief of staff signed it on Hillary's behalf. Autumn Sep 2015 #31