Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Where does the buck stop? MindfulOne Sep 2015 #1
Man. You are carrying water for the right wingers! Human101948 Sep 2015 #3
Why does truth make you so testy? leftynyc Sep 2015 #17
Judicial Watch has been stalking the Clintons for decades. oasis Sep 2015 #21
I knew there was more to this story. murielm99 Sep 2015 #2
didn't they just have another retraction about her? 6chars Sep 2015 #4
Will the Bernistas/Redstate/Fox apologize for jumping on this story? Dawson Leery Sep 2015 #5
such civility yourself karynnj Sep 2015 #23
Do you know what's absurd? Avalux Sep 2015 #25
Oh my! OilemFirchen Sep 2015 #6
The MSM is really showing their asses with the sloppy reporting surrounding this story. It's as if Metric System Sep 2015 #7
NEVER trust rightwing media sources. BlueWaveDem Sep 2015 #8
We owe Judicialwatch a debt for their FOIA work portlander23 Sep 2015 #10
I've never had a chief of staff so how does that work? HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #9
Exactly. RiverLover Sep 2015 #18
Of course it was done with her approval. TM99 Sep 2015 #26
Oh FFS ... eom GeorgeGist Sep 2015 #11
How much difference does that make? Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #12
incredibly minor detail, Huma Abedin could easily be mistaken for one of Hillary's limbs virtualobserver Sep 2015 #14
wait. Who committed a crime here? twii Sep 2015 #15
I am not saying anything like that. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #16
OMG!!! ronnykmarshall Sep 2015 #13
I think this is a totally stupid issue, but Vinca Sep 2015 #19
I am with you on this one.. artislife Sep 2015 #27
as I am sure you are aware, it is a way to keep the story going-day by day. riversedge Sep 2015 #29
How many mea culpa have the NYT now issues about their coverage of Clinton? Godhumor Sep 2015 #20
The more they screw up, the more certain people trust them twii Sep 2015 #22
Oh dear. A rogue chief of staff? No of course not, she signed it on Autumn Sep 2015 #24
If they the word Retraction in their headline like you do--thier riversedge Sep 2015 #28
Kick oasis Sep 2015 #30
Right, Hillary didn't sign it. Hillary's chief of staff signed it on Hillary's behalf. Autumn Sep 2015 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Retraction: Hillary Clint...»Reply #13