Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Reality Check - Working people would be fired and prosecuted for using a Hillary server. And... [View all]Uncle Joe
(65,089 posts)92. I would rather have a President with a stinky toe than one swimming in shit and proud of it. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Reality Check - Working people would be fired and prosecuted for using a Hillary server. And... [View all]
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
OP
Hillary Server - a crash prone system, developed by Wall Street, bought by DNC, you can pick one up
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#3
"supporters like you" lololol - you know what and who is unhealthy for America?
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#26
you warm the cold hearts of the GOP McCarthy campaigners. Innuendo and implied accusations you
Bill USA
Sep 2015
#118
aka someone who serves a subpoena to a public official to release US State Dept communications
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#84
In the store of Entitlement , Marie Antoinette would of had one, and when asked why, it would have
orpupilofnature57
Sep 2015
#127
The RW water you carry has already been long debunked. A civil servant would not be fired. Link?*
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#2
If I ran my corporate email on my home server I would be fired and prosecuted, but I am not rich
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#4
There is a reason law school is three years long and hard to get into, as many are not aware.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#38
If DU is a sign of anything in the larger public, President Cruz is gonna have fun
randys1
Sep 2015
#102
Lol, I used corporate email on my phone, my friends computer and my personal laptop all the time.
bettyellen
Sep 2015
#62
What difference does that make? One can be all things on the Internet, that is why it was invented.
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#36
You misunderstand. I want to talk LAW! What law was broken worthy of dismissal and prosecution?
Fred Sanders
Sep 2015
#40
I think this is a big non-story that is nonetheless in the news cycles.
DisgustipatedinCA
Sep 2015
#42
Even you can see Hillary as a candidate for any political party except her own is indeed crazy.
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#6
Hillary says she is an "outsider", indeed nonsensical - are you saying she drunk tweeted that?
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#11
He has been getting a local or federal government paycheck for nearly a third of a century.
MADem
Sep 2015
#53
You said it, not me. I'll take a ten foot pole when getting into those kinds of discussions.
MADem
Sep 2015
#69
Bernie is an outsider against the "Deep State" of which Hillary is intricately tied to.
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#78
Certainly not to the extent that Hillary is, Bernie's funding is from the people not the mega-rich
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#90
I would rather have a President with a stinky toe than one swimming in shit and proud of it. n/t
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#92
Until the time comes that Bernie does go for a swim, I will give him the benefit of the doubt. n/t
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#98
He's wading--you just don't see it because it doesn't suit your hopes and desires for him as a
MADem
Sep 2015
#100
Please don't regard my "toe" comment as a measure of his involvement. That was posited as a
MADem
Sep 2015
#104
My declaration is in agreement with your posed question and if you read the transcript or viewed the
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#105
If he were so good at using the "bully pulpit" don't you think he would have so done before now?
MADem
Sep 2015
#106
The "bully pulpit" is a Presidential platform not so much that of a Congressperson or Senator.
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#108
None of the people that you cited were President and their voices didn't and don't carry the same
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#110
I never said that nobody ever heard Ted Kennedy, Elizabeth Warren nor any of the other people that
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#112
I will type this slowly and highlight the bolded parts for your re-reading pleasure
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#116
Typing slowly may help your spelling and grammar, but all you're doing is delaying your response.
MADem
Sep 2015
#117
Yes, I have, and you're embarrassing yourself now. You're playing nanny nanny boo boo
MADem
Sep 2015
#121
Name recognition gives an advantage in sparking attention, that's just logic.
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#123
Congratulations on that keen observation and as for "goalposts?" Your first post #53
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#135
Sorry pal--you were leading this little dance, not me. And gish galloping doesn't work with me,
MADem
Sep 2015
#137
My position on the bully pulpit hasn't changed at any point on this thread, except in
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#138
Not sure what your point is, there. An outsider running for POTUS can have a bully pulpit.
MADem
Sep 2015
#139
I suppose "not as much" would've been a better phrase but I also added this to the same post.
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#143
Stop with the 1 of 535 stuff. We all KNOW that some Senators and Reps have higher profiles than
MADem
Sep 2015
#144
I hate to pop your bubble but everyone doesn't know who Elizabeth Warren is anymore than they know
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#145
Now you're moving the goal posts, going from "everyone knows" to "no one" is talking about them..not
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#147
I know what "not" means in that context and I know what your post was stating after I
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#149
Yes it is "everyone capable of being influenced" knows them is absolutist bullshit. n/t
Uncle Joe
Sep 2015
#155
You are confusing the general election electors with super delegates at the nominating convention.
MADem
Sep 2015
#77
Sorry--it is part of the Partys protocols, and pigs will fly before they "scrap" it.
MADem
Sep 2015
#89
oh, so protesting when a group of harmful Wall Street shills takes control of primary process
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#13
Protesting the primary process is the one thing your post didn't seem to mention.
BlueWaveDem
Sep 2015
#21
Nonsense - I work with Democrats and we are disgusted. But we are workers and non-rich.
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#15
The only thing to be disgusted about here is people claiming to be Democrats pushing right-wing
DanTex
Sep 2015
#16
Hillary supporters better grow up because your candidate is going to get shit from anyone
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#23
What company lets an individual employee run a private email server for their
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#28
My husband's for one. We have a private server. Never been hacked in 15 years.
leftofcool
Sep 2015
#30
hahahahahah - go tell that to IBM, HP, Dell, MSFT, Google, INTL and any fortune 500
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#31
My husband worked as an engineer for a telecom company and regularly had to sign
liberal_at_heart
Sep 2015
#44
You are gish galloping and it's not working. Drudge has been aggregating since the nineties.
MADem
Sep 2015
#132
The unscandal has gone meta...it's not just about email, it's not just about the server
HereSince1628
Sep 2015
#49
Bull. What lie? DNC knew that when they used Soviet style primary process to front a polarizing
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#83
Can you please point me to the state or federal statute that prohibits Hillary Servers for...
DemocratSinceBirth
Sep 2015
#66
Here is the official IBM press release supporting Hillary Clinton's open email initiative
whereisjustice
Sep 2015
#75
Some people will read only your headline and get the impression you're serious.
Jim Lane
Sep 2015
#80