Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
87. I'd rather not see any of them overexposed.
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 02:53 PM
Sep 2015

There is an arc to these things. Britney Spears can tell you all about it. She started out as the "IT" girl who could command any price, but she was dogged and pursued and her every mistake was blown up to be more than it was, and she ended up having a breakdown. South Park even did a parody about it.

That's a rather dire example, but in terms of politics, even politicians can be over-exposed. GWBush's popularity didn't just go in the toilet because of his POLICIES, it was because all of the networks and the cable newsers would cut away from Days of Our Lives or Oprah or some cooking/wedding/Real Housewives show to show his dumb ass waddling off a plane and grunting in front of a pre-vetted crowd of cheering, drooling assholes. He never said much of anything, but they covered it ANYWAY. After a while, enough was enough. People just didn't want to SEE him. They didn't want Tom Ridge or some other asshole telling us we were in Threatcon ORANGE. They were tired of it all.

Exposure is a tricky thing--there's just enough, and there's too much. And there's also timing.

Right now, it's the Republicans' time to rip each other to shreds. We don't need to take the news media''s attention away from that all-important effort. They should be focused like one of those LASER BEAMS on which Republican is childishly insulting the other--and they should report it all, relentlessly. The more sound bites--that WE can use, later--the better.

The Republican Party has the equivalent of super-delegates, too. They will control who gets out of the gate. It's not gonna be Trump. It's not gonna be Carson. It's not gonna be Fiorina--they're all too stupid and the Klown Kar party hierarchy doesn't like them. Judging by the way his peers told Ted "Grampa Munster" Cruz to STFU the other day, I'd say it ain't gonna be him, either. Rubio, Jeb (even though he's tanking now--he has MONEY to ride it out), even Fuckerbee have a better shot than those three.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Touché!!! jkbRN Sep 2015 #1
My mom and dad up here wouldn't even tell each other how they were going to vote. polly7 Sep 2015 #2
My in-laws' presidential votes cancelled each other out for the whole 55 years they were married Doctor_J Sep 2015 #4
LOL polly7 Sep 2015 #6
Did your mom and dad hang out on a political blog? brooklynite Sep 2015 #36
Ummmm ......... yeah .......... polly7 Sep 2015 #38
Seriously. senz Sep 2015 #61
People keep asking me if I will vote for Clinton if she is the nominee. I am glad you understand rhett o rick Sep 2015 #69
This is a private website, with a TOS. MADem Sep 2015 #3
What some consider bashing other's consider questioning artislife Sep 2015 #5
excuse me, but i was very clear restorefreedom Sep 2015 #7
There are many on DU that support your points about democracy. A Simple Game Sep 2015 #9
exactly restorefreedom Sep 2015 #16
You're right. You were clear. RufusTFirefly Sep 2015 #13
thanks....and the speed with which this was jumped on restorefreedom Sep 2015 #18
Aren't you so polite to me, but boy can you get rude and snarky downthread? Hmmm. MADem Sep 2015 #31
It reads like free republic PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #42
That's exactly the sort of nasty comment (about people who support a Democrat that you, apparently, MADem Sep 2015 #45
You do not understand that some are sick of the status quo that has put rhett o rick Sep 2015 #63
Agree with everything you say, rhett senz Sep 2015 #64
It won't change her mind because there are some things more important than rhett o rick Sep 2015 #67
Well, then Elizabeth Warren is your enemy, too, if that's your "manifesto." MADem Sep 2015 #73
Nice try for the distraction. Do you support the 99% or Clinton and the 1%?? nm rhett o rick Sep 2015 #76
I support "Clinton and the 99 percent." And that wasn't a "distraction"--that was RIGHT on point. MADem Sep 2015 #77
You have to chose one or the other, the 99% or Clinton. Clinton may support some rhett o rick Sep 2015 #92
thanks for the welcome restorefreedom Sep 2015 #43
I think people pushing these loyalty oaths are doing a couple of things--and it depends on the MADem Sep 2015 #48
there is passion on all sides for sure restorefreedom Sep 2015 #56
Primary debate sound bites are often used in OPPO ads with dire music and dark shading. MADem Sep 2015 #79
i disagree on tactics restorefreedom Sep 2015 #81
Trump says a stupid thing or two at every debate. It gets talked about, he gets attention, and MADem Sep 2015 #82
i get what you are saying restorefreedom Sep 2015 #86
I'd rather not see any of them overexposed. MADem Sep 2015 #87
poor britney restorefreedom Sep 2015 #88
People who talk on the internet don't always get their way. MADem Sep 2015 #91
You're lecturing someone on rudeness? Oilwellian Sep 2015 #49
No kidding! beam me up scottie Sep 2015 #66
Laugh away. I don't resort to personal insults or characterizations. MADem Sep 2015 #78
I don't see anywhere where it says.... daleanime Sep 2015 #17
pretty sad, hey? restorefreedom Sep 2015 #19
It's in the last sentence. MADem Sep 2015 #32
So then in your professional opinion.... daleanime Sep 2015 #35
No, just don't trash Democrats on a general election ballot, and you'll be "safe." MADem Sep 2015 #37
To be fair to the many here who do nothing BUT bash that 20%, it is clear they randys1 Sep 2015 #51
What has that got to do with the OP? And are you and those who are running around sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #25
i wouldn't wait for an answer, sabrina restorefreedom Sep 2015 #29
Cut the crap, Sabrina. You "run around" stirring the pot at every opportunity. MADem Sep 2015 #30
can we find you over yonder? reddread Sep 2015 #47
ROFL n/t Oilwellian Sep 2015 #50
Way to elevate the discourse. And your chuckling pal, too. nt MADem Sep 2015 #72
Funny that. Toxic. I want to end the status quo that finds 22% of American rhett o rick Sep 2015 #70
And you're doing it by "holding forth" on DU? MADem Sep 2015 #71
K&R liberal_at_heart Sep 2015 #8
Big K/R 840high Sep 2015 #10
K & R SoapBox Sep 2015 #11
I think the "Republicans are worse" argument has reached its pull date. jalan48 Sep 2015 #12
Some here seem to think that's an archaic notion and that your vote belongs to a party. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #14
Marta and I vote for a candidate or issue we choose on our own Omaha Steve Sep 2015 #15
In a democracy, we the people run and control the government, not those politicians we elect. rladdi Sep 2015 #20
Thank you. sibelian Sep 2015 #21
Excellent post MissDeeds Sep 2015 #22
The act of "voting" can never be deemed as "throwing away your vote." Le Taz Hot Sep 2015 #23
not mine hfojvt Sep 2015 #24
Did you threaten people that 'if you don't vote you can't join the country club'? I believe that's sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #27
I used fear, that's my point hfojvt Sep 2015 #41
kinda making my point restorefreedom Sep 2015 #28
ah okay hfojvt Sep 2015 #39
it definitely matters who is in the wh restorefreedom Sep 2015 #40
Also: it is up to the CANDIDATE to EARN your vote. Maedhros Sep 2015 #26
Thank you. AtomicKitten Sep 2015 #33
What I find repugnant is people calling themselves progressives while threatening to sit out DanTex Sep 2015 #34
I find that very repugnant as well. randys1 Sep 2015 #52
If you want to keep posting on DU you better not campaign for anyone other than the Democratic Metric System Sep 2015 #44
Succinct and to the point. Puglover Sep 2015 #46
I KNEW Santa Claus was a Democrat. I knew it! I knew it! senz Sep 2015 #62
You should read the terms of service for the DU. We are applegrove Sep 2015 #53
wrong. we are not to, on this site, restorefreedom Sep 2015 #57
What restorefreedom said Android3.14 Sep 2015 #83
i have noticed restorefreedom Sep 2015 #89
Exactly Android3.14 Sep 2015 #90
in the world of "Scandal"America is a republic olddots Sep 2015 #54
Not if Diebold does the counting... zappaman Sep 2015 #55
lets hope that doesn't happen. nt restorefreedom Sep 2015 #58
Funny that you'd mention that. Diebold will most likely help the oligarchy chosen candidate. rhett o rick Sep 2015 #68
I once told my boss to go screw himself when he tried to tell me how to vote tularetom Sep 2015 #59
Yeah, that's some *democracy" the loyalty oath crowd is pushing Catherina Sep 2015 #60
Agreed. 99Forever Sep 2015 #65
People fought and died for anonymous voting Hydra Sep 2015 #74
You vote behind a closed curtain treestar Sep 2015 #75
no bullying, demanding or fearmongering retrowire Sep 2015 #80
Thank you. Great reminder. Autumn Sep 2015 #84
just thought some might need to hear it restorefreedom Sep 2015 #85
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»let's clear something up:...»Reply #87