Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
17. No., because he's campaigned there
Fri Oct 2, 2015, 08:41 AM
Oct 2015

and people in that state know who he is, and what he stands for, as do the voters in Iowa by now.

But in the deep South, that he's barely been to. Too bad there's not a good way to tease out name recognition alone from having a vague idea what a person stands for from understanding quite clearly the differences between specific candidates.

We are rapidly getting past the basic name recognition thing, and I might well be completely wrong in my above post. But Bernie does not yet have the national presence Hillary has had since 1992, and that will persist until after Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.

I have read here that Bernie is barely covered by the MSM. Since I don't own a TV, and only occasionally watch anything on line, so I don't know how accurate that is. I get my information from the internet, from reading books, magazines, and newspapers. So my perception of lots of things is very different from other people's.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More good numbers for Hillary. leftofcool Oct 2015 #1
Yet another southern state where Hillary dominates and Bernie bombs. DCBob Oct 2015 #2
I know. We suck down in the South. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #18
I would still argue that this early on, SheilaT Oct 2015 #3
So you're suggesting that Bernie is ahead in NH because of name recognition? brooklynite Oct 2015 #16
No., because he's campaigned there SheilaT Oct 2015 #17
"Sanders revs up North Carolina crowd during Southern swing" brooklynite Oct 2015 #19
Yes. And his numbers have improved there. SheilaT Oct 2015 #20
Guess Bernie will have to go down there and let folks hear some real, honest-to-goodness truth senz Oct 2015 #4
Is there a reason we shouldn't post Hillary's good poll numbers? leftofcool Oct 2015 #5
Of course not! I hope it helps. senz Oct 2015 #6
I am interested in Louisiana and not surprised by the poll numbers. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #8
Good numbers for Hillary, I think there will be higher numbers after the first debate when her Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #7
Wow tied in this poll! FloridaBlues Oct 2015 #9
Only five months to go before LA's primary n/t Scootaloo Oct 2015 #10
Louisiana is very humid. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #11
The debate may change things. MainSt99 Oct 2015 #12
Folks from that neck of the woods tend to be more pro-military. oasis Oct 2015 #14
Debates dont matter when the gap is 50 points. DCBob Oct 2015 #23
OMG, the Dems could LOSE Louisiana if Sanders wins!!! nt Bonobo Oct 2015 #13
Media-spin title-bait suggestion: Hillary under 60% as some people vote for others energy_model Oct 2015 #15
I've decided to ignore all polls that include Uncle Joe, until he officially declares. Buns_of_Fire Oct 2015 #21
More great numbers for Hillary! BooScout Oct 2015 #22
Oh noes! 99Forever Oct 2015 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Louisiana Poll: Hillary 5...»Reply #17