Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)The DNC Screwed Hillary Now Get Ready For A Bernie Sanders Earthquake - Salon [View all]
The DNC screwed Hillary now get ready for a Bernie Sanders earthquakeLimiting debates did her no favors. Now she's barely leading a 74-year-old socialist. This debate is pivotal.
Bill Curry - Salon
Monday, Oct 12, 2015 09:38 AM PDT
![](http://media.salon.com/2015/06/sanders_hillary3-620x412.jpg)
(Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin/Reuters/Carlo Allegri/Photo montage by Salon)
<snip>
With so many people thinking the system is rigged and that politics has devolved into mere vulgar entertainment, the Democratic Partys choice of a Las Vegas casino as the venue for its first presidential debate seems counterintuitive. That the casino in question bears the surname of Steve Wynn seems odd as well. In 2012, Wynn, once a Democrat of sorts, dropped $10 million on Karl Roves Super PAC. Hes gone on Fox News to lambaste Obama, whom he calls a socialist. His punishment: a ton of free publicity plus whatever it cost to rent the hall.
The Democratic National Committee delayed the debates as long as it could and limited their total number to six. By way of comparison, there were 26 debates in 2008. The first was held in April 2007; by this point in the cycle there had already been 13. To enforce its new limit the party threatens a drastic sanction: anyone caught participating in a rogue debate will be locked out of all party debates.
The phrase Democratic National Committee is imprecise. When DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz announced the schedule last August she didnt say who made the decision or how. Nor did anyone ask. It seems like an awfully closed system for an outfit with the word democratic right there in its name. I wondered how the party picked it. Did its national committee hold a meeting? If so, was it public? Was there a notice, agenda, or minutes? Was there even a vote?
On Thursday I spoke to the DNC communications director, a nice man named Luis Miranda. After a few minutes of polite evasions I had my answers: no, no, no, no, no and no. From what I could glean, staff made recommendations to Schultz and she then made the call all on her own. It isnt clear that party rules authorize her to do so. What is clear is that they shouldnt. Miranda told me the party consults with all the candidates. I dont doubt him, but the consultations dont appear to mean much, in that four of the five candidates wanted more debates.
The fifth is Hillary Clinton, who recently said in a low whisper that shes open to more debates. Clinton is still the nominal frontrunner and the establishment choice. In 2008 Schultz was in the bunker with Clinton till the bitter end. Clinton is the only candidate in the field likely to retain Schultz in her present job or otherwise advance her career. Theres a good chance the only important consultation Schultz had was with Clinton. This should come as no surprise. Every four years party insiders tweak the process in hopes that some establishment favorite can wrap things up early. Due to the law of unintended consequences, and because these people arent nearly as smart as they think, this almost always backfires...
<snip>
More: http://www.salon.com/2015/10/12/the_dnc_screwed_hillary_now_get_ready_for_a_bernie_sanders_earthquake/
![](/emoticons/bounce.gif)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
161 replies, 12836 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (192)
ReplyReply to this post
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
The DNC Screwed Hillary Now Get Ready For A Bernie Sanders Earthquake - Salon [View all]
WillyT
Oct 2015
OP
People are sick of Politics-As-Usual and the games that politicians play.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2015
#1
Thanks, and the alert is a perfect example how stupid this is now. Disagree with
randys1
Oct 2015
#79
No. I agree with Twain and I think his statement is appropriate to the discussion.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2015
#74
You appear to be saying that as an insult, but it isn't. The TeaParty grassroots people
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#13
Your attempts to distort what I say is telling. You are apparently not able to address
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#24
THIS is what scares me and should scare all liberals. Are you as willing as you seem to be to
randys1
Oct 2015
#33
Our founders decided that they didn't want to fight for small changes, they
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#65
Social issues are very important to me. I don't think we will get much social justice
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#104
That is a False choice. We ain't choosing between HRC and a GOP stooge it is HRC or SANDERS
Vincardog
Oct 2015
#87
Exactly. And that's why they fabricated the faux social justice vs. economic justice outrage.
cui bono
Oct 2015
#106
It's interesting who call themselves liberal. As you put it, they think that if they are for
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#108
Wow, that's very tough of you. But be aware, while you are doing that, Goldman-Sachs
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#109
The 1% Oligarchy wants us to fight among ourselves, but they are the problem. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#67
Those in the Tea Party you are mentioning are not the grass-roots. Those you are describing are
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#148
I am not arguing any of that. We've gotten away from what I said, probably because
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#150
I hear it lot from Democrats. They are not happy with the Third Way takeover of their party.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#92
You cannot be President and not be a politician: It takes good politician to win!
lewebley3
Oct 2015
#8
Opinions do differ. I would rather have someone right off the street even with no qualifications if
Enthusiast
Oct 2015
#84
Even if you are correct that she is the most "qualified", that doesn't mean she will
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#17
Hillary is whatever the polls want her to be. I wouldn't call that a breath of fresh air, I would
Autumn
Oct 2015
#62
No, the job of the president is to serve the people. Your views sound very much
jtuck004
Oct 2015
#159
Politician is a person who brings people together: That is a person serving the people:
lewebley3
Oct 2015
#160
She has surrounded herself with sycophants and ass kissers who only tell her what she wants to hear
tularetom
Oct 2015
#21
The RW has indeed convinced the general public that public goods are socialist, that is "bad"
eridani
Oct 2015
#161
Earthquake, guess this is a new look on the outcome, I will have to bookmark this one.
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#36
There ya go! Four out of the five candidates wanted MORE DEBATES. The 5th...wait for it
in_cog_ni_to
Oct 2015
#50
This is a great article that really sums up the difference between the two leading candidates.
BernieFan57
Oct 2015
#51
a big issue is that the more Clinton's side uses its levers of party power the more it backfires
MisterP
Oct 2015
#55
"because these people arent nearly as smart as they think, this almost always backfires... "
Spitfire of ATJ
Oct 2015
#58
Now a 15-20 point lead is "barely" leading apparently. Yeah, no agenda there... nt
Adrahil
Oct 2015
#60
The hill shills love to ignore that she is trailing in the first two contests and losing ground
morningfog
Oct 2015
#63
What is he complaining about? Sanders has made no discernible effort to join the party.
ucrdem
Oct 2015
#66
Go ahead, ignore the fact that Bernie will defeat Clinton soundly enough that everyone notices
We Want Bernie
Oct 2015
#110
Bernie suggested the Democrats debate the Republicans during primary season
ALBliberal
Oct 2015
#112