Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
People are sick of Politics-As-Usual and the games that politicians play. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #1
I hear that a lot from teapartiers. randys1 Oct 2015 #3
Mark Twain wasn't a Tea Bagger. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #4
THREAD WIN, Hillary attacker actually quotes TWAIN LOL randys1 Oct 2015 #5
Are you also going blame Mark? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #7
Your use of TWAIN is laughable. randys1 Oct 2015 #9
Twain was a humorist. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #11
I am a prophet, did you know that? randys1 Oct 2015 #14
And, Twain would be responible for that? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #16
Stop dragging Twain into this nightmare DU libertarians are preparing us for. randys1 Oct 2015 #18
haaaaaa!!!!!!!!!! wendylaroux Oct 2015 #52
+1. Nailed it. (N/T) Old Crow Oct 2015 #111
Jury results pinebox Oct 2015 #53
FWIW, I would have voted to leave it alone. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #75
I did pinebox Oct 2015 #77
Libertarians? From a HRC supporter? LOL pinebox Oct 2015 #54
Juror 6 here and you so nailed it. nt ucrdem Oct 2015 #56
Thanks, and the alert is a perfect example how stupid this is now. Disagree with randys1 Oct 2015 #79
No. I agree with Twain and I think his statement is appropriate to the discussion. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #74
You want prophecy? I'll give you prophecy.... daleanime Oct 2015 #118
Dire imprecations! Death and mayhem follow... druidity33 Oct 2015 #127
"Hillary attacker " "libertarians"? AlbertCat Oct 2015 #27
"We have the best Congress money can buy." Mark Twain (nt) Ned Flanders Oct 2015 #89
'aye 840high Oct 2015 #138
Twain is often cited as inspiring the term "New Deal" deutsey Oct 2015 #90
Thanks, I'll add that book to my list. navarth Oct 2015 #123
You appear to be saying that as an insult, but it isn't. The TeaParty grassroots people rhett o rick Oct 2015 #13
I have nothing in common with racists, misogynists, homophobes, etc. randys1 Oct 2015 #15
Your attempts to distort what I say is telling. You are apparently not able to address rhett o rick Oct 2015 #24
THIS is what scares me and should scare all liberals. Are you as willing as you seem to be to randys1 Oct 2015 #33
Our founders decided that they didn't want to fight for small changes, they rhett o rick Oct 2015 #65
So the social issues dont really effect you, got it. randys1 Oct 2015 #76
Social issues are very important to me. I don't think we will get much social justice rhett o rick Oct 2015 #104
Which "founders"? JackRiddler Oct 2015 #129
Are you trying to make a point? nm rhett o rick Oct 2015 #130
Just bored with everyone's bullshit about the "founders." JackRiddler Oct 2015 #136
You have gotten off the issues of the campaign against the GOP. DhhD Oct 2015 #68
You state this as if it's already decided passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #81
That is a False choice. We ain't choosing between HRC and a GOP stooge it is HRC or SANDERS Vincardog Oct 2015 #87
+1,000,000 cui bono Oct 2015 #105
...^ that 840high Oct 2015 #141
Bernie doesn't bash Hillary, nor do I. mahina Oct 2015 #100
Bash Wasserman Schultz for keeping agenda obscure bjobotts Oct 2015 #139
This is how you rationalize calling Hillary a "liberal". beerandjesus Oct 2015 #57
Exactly. And that's why they fabricated the faux social justice vs. economic justice outrage. cui bono Oct 2015 #106
It's interesting who call themselves liberal. As you put it, they think that if they are for rhett o rick Oct 2015 #108
+1000. GoneFishin Oct 2015 #133
Yeah F*** the tea party workinclasszero Oct 2015 #28
Wow, that's very tough of you. But be aware, while you are doing that, Goldman-Sachs rhett o rick Oct 2015 #109
It's about with whom your candidate has things in common, elehhhhna Oct 2015 #73
You want to know? pinebox Oct 2015 #80
You made someone sad Lurks Often Oct 2015 #116
imagine pinebox Oct 2015 #144
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #146
Yeah, I think we both have a pretty good idea Lurks Often Oct 2015 #154
...+1 840high Oct 2015 #142
I don't think it is that we agree with the tea party. PatrickforO Oct 2015 #94
You have more in common than you think. zeemike Oct 2015 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #132
could not agree more restorefreedom Oct 2015 #37
The 1% Oligarchy wants us to fight among ourselves, but they are the problem. nm rhett o rick Oct 2015 #67
yup. i have a vision restorefreedom Oct 2015 #69
Like I have said before. WHEN CRABS ROAR Oct 2015 #117
Whoa! one_voice Oct 2015 #147
Those in the Tea Party you are mentioning are not the grass-roots. Those you are describing are rhett o rick Oct 2015 #148
Every Tea Party person.. one_voice Oct 2015 #149
I am not arguing any of that. We've gotten away from what I said, probably because rhett o rick Oct 2015 #150
Right on! olegramps Oct 2015 #155
"no matter who, no matter what," AlbertCat Oct 2015 #23
When someone says my way or the highway, same thing randys1 Oct 2015 #25
"my way or the highway," AlbertCat Oct 2015 #32
Sparky Anderson said that... Indepatriot Oct 2015 #134
I hear that a lot from everybody Armstead Oct 2015 #34
Oh please, partisanship LOL randys1 Oct 2015 #39
Well if that's yoour attitude I'd say you are a circular defeatist Armstead Oct 2015 #42
You lost yourself, now you dont even know what you are talking about. randys1 Oct 2015 #45
....and you say we have to accept that the system has to stay broken Armstead Oct 2015 #47
That is a defeatist attitude, a defensive attitude passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #83
I hear it lot from Democrats. They are not happy with the Third Way takeover of their party. sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #92
Nicely stated.... Docreed2003 Oct 2015 #103
You cannot be President and not be a politician: It takes good politician to win! lewebley3 Oct 2015 #8
Opinions differ. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #12
Opinions do differ. I would rather have someone right off the street even with no qualifications if Enthusiast Oct 2015 #84
unwise to feed trolls. nt navarth Oct 2015 #124
Even if you are correct that she is the most "qualified", that doesn't mean she will rhett o rick Oct 2015 #17
Hillary is the most qualified AlbertCat Oct 2015 #35
To do what? JackRiddler Oct 2015 #137
Hillary is -- Hell Hath No Fury Oct 2015 #41
Same here. 840high Oct 2015 #143
Hillary is whatever the polls want her to be. I wouldn't call that a breath of fresh air, I would Autumn Oct 2015 #62
Perhaps true for the candidate. That doesn't mean the people win. n/t jtuck004 Oct 2015 #64
President use to chuckle about people who wanted there Kids be President! lewebley3 Oct 2015 #158
No, the job of the president is to serve the people. Your views sound very much jtuck004 Oct 2015 #159
Politician is a person who brings people together: That is a person serving the people: lewebley3 Oct 2015 #160
Uh... I guess you didn't actually read the article the OP is about. cui bono Oct 2015 #107
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #152
Not sick enough or Bernie would be the front runner right now. nt ladjf Oct 2015 #126
Just wow. This lays it out, loud & clear - BOOM! 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #2
Very Kind Of You To Say, 99th_Monkey WillyT Oct 2015 #22
Well written Boov Oct 2015 #6
Yes, agree...excellent. Nice work! InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2015 #44
I was better than most Mnpaul Oct 2015 #122
K & R Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #10
I think that if there were more debates, she'd be polling lower. nm rhett o rick Oct 2015 #19
Bernie is going to benefit greatly from the debates, delayed as they are. hifiguy Oct 2015 #40
I imagine when the contrast between Bernie and Hillary is seen, Vinca Oct 2015 #20
She has surrounded herself with sycophants and ass kissers who only tell her what she wants to hear tularetom Oct 2015 #21
has the phrase "everyday americans" been scrapped? restorefreedom Oct 2015 #30
Of course there is still a very good chance she can get nominated AlbertCat Oct 2015 #38
+!. And no one can motivate more of the reichwing cave orcs hifiguy Oct 2015 #43
A Socialist on the ballot redstateblues Oct 2015 #46
Give it a rest, in the name of the FSM. hifiguy Oct 2015 #49
While true, to the average, low attention span voter Socialist = Communist. BillZBubb Oct 2015 #82
To the average voter, socialist = Democrat eridani Oct 2015 #153
I disagree. The average voter doesn't view Democrat = socialist. BillZBubb Oct 2015 #156
The RW has indeed convinced the general public that public goods are socialist, that is "bad" eridani Oct 2015 #161
Great read! Thanks for posting! leftupnorth Oct 2015 #26
Intelligent analysis. Bernie will win Tuesday. Hands down. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #29
Very interesting -- and insightful -- read. Hell Hath No Fury Oct 2015 #30
+1 nt jonno99 Oct 2015 #98
That is about the heart of it. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #131
Earthquake, guess this is a new look on the outcome, I will have to bookmark this one. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #36
Ouch! K&R magical thyme Oct 2015 #48
There ya go! Four out of the five candidates wanted MORE DEBATES. The 5th...wait for it in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #50
After the general in 2016, she is gone anyway. DFW Oct 2015 #95
but but but it's not up to her... LiberalLovinLug Oct 2015 #128
This is a great article that really sums up the difference between the two leading candidates. BernieFan57 Oct 2015 #51
Like I have said before. WHEN CRABS ROAR Oct 2015 #119
a big issue is that the more Clinton's side uses its levers of party power the more it backfires MisterP Oct 2015 #55
"because these people aren’t nearly as smart as they think, this almost always backfires... " Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #58
"Barely leading". Hahaha! JaneyVee Oct 2015 #59
Now a 15-20 point lead is "barely" leading apparently. Yeah, no agenda there... nt Adrahil Oct 2015 #60
It is when it used to be a 60-point lead. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #61
The hill shills love to ignore that she is trailing in the first two contests and losing ground morningfog Oct 2015 #63
What is he complaining about? Sanders has made no discernible effort to join the party. ucrdem Oct 2015 #66
Doesn't matter. GDP is now a place for flamebait. Only one opinion is allowed. shenmue Oct 2015 #85
PARTY BEFORE POLICY DirtyHippyBastard Oct 2015 #91
Sanders has no party, no constituency, no bench and exactly two endorsements. ucrdem Oct 2015 #93
Well, you convinced me DirtyHippyBastard Oct 2015 #99
whistling in the dark... (nt) Ned Flanders Oct 2015 #101
Go ahead, ignore the fact that Bernie will defeat Clinton soundly enough that everyone notices We Want Bernie Oct 2015 #110
Thank you. 840high Oct 2015 #145
It's high time that the party join Bernie (and the rest of us). BernieFan57 Oct 2015 #120
Kicked and recommended, the author nailed it. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #70
Thank you, Willy Jack Rabbit Oct 2015 #71
Yes It Is... WillyT Oct 2015 #88
Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #72
So now limited debates are a GOOD thing. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #78
That is to be determined. BillZBubb Oct 2015 #86
Hm, big change in DNC photo in email I got from them today about the debate. Gmak Oct 2015 #97
Should the DNC Chair have the sole power to decide Eric J in MN Oct 2015 #102
That would be a good resolution Mnpaul Oct 2015 #121
Bernie suggested the Democrats debate the Republicans during primary season ALBliberal Oct 2015 #112
DWS picked the wrong horse, and she'll have to ride it out of town tomm2thumbs Oct 2015 #113
This looks like a way to explain a poor performance by Hillary and lower expectations. EEO Oct 2015 #114
i was wondering why the first debate is in a casino hopemountain Oct 2015 #115
Yes I noticed this too navarth Oct 2015 #125
Willy - thank you for 840high Oct 2015 #135
Anytime 840high, Anytime... WillyT Oct 2015 #140
"Clinton Loses First National Democratic Party Debate." Major Hogwash Oct 2015 #151
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #157
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The DNC Screwed Hillary —...»Reply #58