2016 Postmortem

R B Garr

(17,985 posts)

51. Yes! His phony moral high ground starts eroding pretty fast when examined closer.

Reply to Sheepshank (Reply #6)

Mon Oct 12, 2015, 08:25 PM

Oct 2015

No debates for thee, but many debates for me. So phony.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders nears debate test, once refused request for more than 6 debates [View all] wyldwolf Oct 2015 OP

Does this hit-piece have a LINK, or is this your personal handiwork? nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #1

It is a hit piece. Dragging up something from 14 years ago completely out of context to create a Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #3

Does that rule apply across the board? frazzled Oct 2015 #12

You want me to propose rules for Internet comment boards? I am working on it...will let you know. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #13

Your own rules will be a good start frazzled Oct 2015 #17

It is NOT a hit piece--it's an analysis of Sanders' past styles in debates with links. MADem Oct 2015 #22

The Boston Globe is the premier newspaper of New England. MADem Oct 2015 #10

I asked if there was a link to the hit-piece, and then I got one. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #14

I regard it as an historical, not a "hit," piece. MADem Oct 2015 #15

My point is simply this 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #25

So, you're saying with a debate looming, we should not talk about debate styles? Seriously? MADem Oct 2015 #27

It's fine to discuss debate styles, ok. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #33

I am not "defensive," but I am getting just a teeny wee bit tired of the horse shit. MADem Oct 2015 #37

A White House counselor to Bill Clinton also thinks DWS rigged the debate schedule 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #42

That poor guy--tried like hell to be governor of CT; was crushed like a bug, wonder why? MADem Oct 2015 #46

I think this is where we agree to disagree. Have a nice day. -nt- 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #49

Dead on. Perfect. Action_Patrol Oct 2015 #57

no, I added the link then two minutes later you asked for one. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #40

Well, congratulations for beating me to it. The original did NOT have a link 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #43

No, it didn't because I forgot to put it. But you obviously see something nefarious in that. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #44

No , but I was admittedly confused by the lack of a link. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #47

Yes, I noticed this was the Boston Globe also. As for who we get to Hortensis Oct 2015 #35

The Globe article is FAVORABLE to him, too--but it requres that people READ IT to see that! MADem Oct 2015 #38

No sense to us. But that "rile them up" thing? Hortensis Oct 2015 #41

I'm incredibly pleased that Sanders is doing well enough MannyGoldstein Oct 2015 #2

I am confident all our stellar candidates will acquit themselves admirably. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #4

Except for Clinton, of course. We Want Bernie Oct 2015 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #20

I am confident all our stellar candidates will acquit themselves admirably. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #23

Stop it kenfrequed Oct 2015 #45

... SidDithers Oct 2015 #59

Sanders pointed a finger and yelled �Do you not believe me?" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #5

"A crooked finger"!!1! whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #11

Well we can add changing his mind on number of debates, to Bernie's resume of changes Sheepshank Oct 2015 #6

But that can't be! That's a death penalty offense according to some DUers. stevenleser Oct 2015 #48

Yes! His phony moral high ground starts eroding pretty fast when examined closer. R B Garr Oct 2015 #51

Aww, you left this part out... Ino Oct 2015 #7

Aww. You have an amazing grasp for the obvious - or can count paragraphs. I left a lot of it out. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #8

Lots of negative about Bernie bkkyosemite Oct 2015 #9

You didn't read the article, either, I see. MADem Oct 2015 #26

Bkkyosemity, people BUY ad time. It's not a fix. It's a purchase. Hortensis Oct 2015 #36

the only test that will matter restorefreedom Oct 2015 #18

One, this is a retread and two read how Meub artislife Oct 2015 #19

Citizens United funded talking point AGAIN! Lol! They sure try to get mileage out of the sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #21

This from a Republican "personal injury lawyer" aka Ambulance Chaser? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #24

So, we shouldn't listen to him? He said that Sanders was a good debater--you're saying he's lying? MADem Oct 2015 #29

Go ahead if you want to. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #30

Uh...you were the one discrediting what the guy had to say--not me. nt MADem Oct 2015 #31

only Hillary's past can be discussed. the new messiah is above such historical examination nt msongs Oct 2015 #28

Totally untrue. DU has discussed Sanders' past to ludicrous degrees since he announced, starting merrily Oct 2015 #32

I hope there aren't any sharp objects near the stage that Scary Sanders might use Armstead Oct 2015 #34

and if he doesn't get her ibegurpard Oct 2015 #55

Lol. morningfog Oct 2015 #39

Kick nt stevenleser Oct 2015 #50

Yes, because congressional races are just like the Presidency. GeorgeGist Oct 2015 #52

Ha ha ha ha artislife Oct 2015 #53

Lol, Meub burst into Sanders' meeting and demanded "about eight debates." Vattel Oct 2015 #54

Kick nt stevenleser Oct 2015 #56

What an utter trash OP jfern Oct 2015 #58