Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Bernie Sanders isn't going to be President in two words. [View all]Flying Shoe
(23 posts)88. Ahh.. but find you correct yoda does not.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is that why Obama, the 'Socialist' won in a landslide! Lol! Omg seriously, they STILL call Obama
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#10
You can either be a slave to Republican definitions or you can define yourself, the former
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#16
That's a main reason, other than his message which resonates with the people and his authenticity as
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#45
You are free to support the candidate of your choice for any reason you deem appropriate
Gothmog
Oct 2015
#61
We are in the primary process and you are free to vote for who you want for any reason you want
Gothmog
Oct 2015
#60
Kerry came within a couple of percentage points of winning the electoral college
Gothmog
Oct 2015
#59
Bernie beats, ties, or is close to beating GOP candidates in polls, some more so than Hillary
Honeylies
Oct 2015
#85
Yes, if you do not run a traditional campaign with a ground game and polling, you spend less
Gothmog
Oct 2015
#93
That's correct not to mention TV ads, Bernie has been frugal with the peoples' money.
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#94
I used to think DUers were better informed and thoughtful such that they could easily distinguish
cpompilo
Oct 2015
#14
those studies were in 2010 and 2011. by April 2015 those numbers had changed
magical thyme
Oct 2015
#27
Chris Clilizza does one piece that does not attack Hillary Clinton and now he is wrong
Gothmog
Oct 2015
#80
It's funny that you should mention the word "Democrat," from this USA Today Poll dated Oct 4th
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#9
The rest is not filler, it's a snapshot as to what the American People think about the candidates.
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#19
Doesn't the Democratic Party have more money than an Independent Party in Vermont?
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#21
The voting section says a lot, huh. The other is talking points someone wants others to believe, I
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#29
It said a lot on Oct 4th both in poll numbers and the peoples' perception about the candidates
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#32
I overlook talking points especially when it isn't true, say what you want, attack, but it does not
Thinkingabout
Oct 2015
#34
It may be true for you, but if the poll is valid, why shouldn't the stated perceptions be? n/t
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#37
Another vote of confidence for the republican party by a DU Clinton supporter
Scootaloo
Oct 2015
#11
Funny how you people give Obama credit and no blame to hillarys lack of support. nt
Logical
Oct 2015
#68
He was also an African American and some people claimed that would be "inconceivable."
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#24