Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

You keep using that word... Scootaloo Oct 2015 #1
Are you suggesting it doesn't mean what I think it means? Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #3
How about these two words Gothmog Oct 2015 #2
How about these words. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #5
That is more than two words Gothmog Oct 2015 #7
I never said that post was only two words. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #13
Oh, I'd place that bet! Ino Oct 2015 #15
Go to predictwise or the Irish bookies Gothmog Oct 2015 #79
OK, found one... Ino Oct 2015 #83
How many voters have you talked to about it? JDPriestly Oct 2015 #43
In Texas, Sanders is not that popular nor are the terms socialism or socialist Gothmog Oct 2015 #78
When was the last time that Texas voted for a Democrat for president? JDPriestly Oct 2015 #81
I and a large number of other voters are working hard to turn Texas blue Gothmog Oct 2015 #82
Two word limit? daleanime Oct 2015 #76
Agree, but.. Flying Shoe Oct 2015 #97
Is that why Obama, the 'Socialist' won in a landslide! Lol! Omg seriously, they STILL call Obama sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #10
President Obama never claimed to be a socialist Gothmog Oct 2015 #12
You can either be a slave to Republican definitions or you can define yourself, the former Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #16
Or you can support a viable candidate who can win in the general election Gothmog Oct 2015 #42
That's a main reason, other than his message which resonates with the people and his authenticity as Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #45
How can he win? Gothmog Oct 2015 #52
I do not think that either Hillary or Joe Biden can win a general election. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #47
You are free to support the candidate of your choice for any reason you deem appropriate Gothmog Oct 2015 #61
Viable. artislife Oct 2015 #50
gothmog - at least allow hopemountain Oct 2015 #53
We are in the primary process and you are free to vote for who you want for any reason you want Gothmog Oct 2015 #60
Remember how viable Kerry was? frylock Oct 2015 #56
Kerry came within a couple of percentage points of winning the electoral college Gothmog Oct 2015 #59
Bernie beats, ties, or is close to beating GOP candidates in polls, some more so than Hillary Honeylies Oct 2015 #85
But he will lack the financial resources to run a competitive campaign Gothmog Oct 2015 #86
Bernie nearly matched Hillary's fundraising in the 3rd quarter Honeylies Oct 2015 #87
Not to mention Bernie spent less. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #90
So true! Honeylies Oct 2015 #91
Yes, if you do not run a traditional campaign with a ground game and polling, you spend less Gothmog Oct 2015 #93
That's correct not to mention TV ads, Bernie has been frugal with the peoples' money. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #94
Support the candidate of your choice Gothmog Oct 2015 #95
Read post 52 on this thread Gothmog Oct 2015 #92
Interesting choice of words. Major Hogwash Oct 2015 #70
It wasn't just a comment about President Obama. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #73
I used to think DUers were better informed and thoughtful such that they could easily distinguish cpompilo Oct 2015 #14
Don't worry so much about DU'ers.... PosterChild Oct 2015 #55
those studies were in 2010 and 2011. by April 2015 those numbers had changed magical thyme Oct 2015 #27
The Washington Post disagrees with your analysis on these polls Gothmog Oct 2015 #72
cutting and pasting = analysis? magical thyme Oct 2015 #74
That article is an Opinion Piece written by Chris Cillizza in his Column. KoKo Oct 2015 #75
Chris Clilizza does one piece that does not attack Hillary Clinton and now he is wrong Gothmog Oct 2015 #80
Count Floyd has a two word reply, "Oooooh, Scary!" mhatrw Oct 2015 #31
You don't get it. He Wants That Fight! Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #35
Why Bernie Sanders isn’t going to be president, in five word Gothmog Oct 2015 #71
LOL! Segami Oct 2015 #4
One word: ucrdem Oct 2015 #6
It's funny that you should mention the word "Democrat," from this USA Today Poll dated Oct 4th Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #9
I see HRC 40%, Sanders 21%. The rest is filler. ucrdem Oct 2015 #17
The rest is not filler, it's a snapshot as to what the American People think about the candidates. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #19
Taxes. We're talking about Vermont. ucrdem Oct 2015 #20
Doesn't the Democratic Party have more money than an Independent Party in Vermont? Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #21
LOL. ucrdem Oct 2015 #23
The Republicans in Vermont had a lot of money in 2006 Mnpaul Oct 2015 #58
The Vermont Democratic Party is proud to feature Bernie on its web site Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #51
The voting section says a lot, huh. The other is talking points someone wants others to believe, I Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #29
It said a lot on Oct 4th both in poll numbers and the peoples' perception about the candidates Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #32
I overlook talking points especially when it isn't true, say what you want, attack, but it does not Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #34
It may be true for you, but if the poll is valid, why shouldn't the stated perceptions be? n/t Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #37
Perceptions is not factual. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #38
Regarding perception Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #40
Another vote of confidence for the republican party by a DU Clinton supporter Scootaloo Oct 2015 #11
LOL, OK, wow, remember 2008? I guess not. nt Logical Oct 2015 #63
Sure, and I also remember 2004: ucrdem Oct 2015 #65
Oh FFS, Hillary had a 30 point lead in 2008 and lost it. Unbelievable. nt Logical Oct 2015 #66
Well once Joe makes it official she'll have that and more ucrdem Oct 2015 #67
Funny how you people give Obama credit and no blame to hillarys lack of support. nt Logical Oct 2015 #68
Well, this time Clinton has Barack, Bill, and every other Dem behind her, ucrdem Oct 2015 #69
Phew! I thought this was going to be an irrelevant thread about his hair...nt jonno99 Oct 2015 #8
Berning Sands of the Fire Swamp reddread Oct 2015 #18
So was this dude from Chicago........... raven mad Oct 2015 #22
He was also an African American and some people claimed that would be "inconceivable." Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #24
That, sir, is a perfect analogy - raven mad Oct 2015 #25
See ya tomorrow . orpupilofnature57 Oct 2015 #26
You forgot the sarcasm tag. Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #28
I hate using the sarcasm tag, it's like having to explain a joke. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #30
It is always safer here to use it. Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #33
I added the video for the sarcasm impaired. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #36
I hope so. Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #39
You keep saying that sabbat hunter Oct 2015 #41
No word, by itself, expresses how wonderful this post is except: Aerows Oct 2015 #44
Thanks Aerows, Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #46
I gotcha, and I hope you have a lovely dinner! Aerows Oct 2015 #49
Hahaha! lovemydog Oct 2015 #48
You wins teh interwebs... blackspade Oct 2015 #54
Remember that nice guy SheilaT Oct 2015 #57
Never get involved in a primary war on DU. LWolf Oct 2015 #62
LOL! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #64
As Sanders once said, "I'm a socialist and I mean it! Anybody want a peanut?" Vattel Oct 2015 #77
Thanks for the chuckle, Uncle Joe. K&R Hiraeth Oct 2015 #84
Ahh.. but find you correct yoda does not. Flying Shoe Oct 2015 #88
Welcome to DU! n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #89
Thank you! Flying Shoe Oct 2015 #98
LOL. "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." FSogol Oct 2015 #96
:) suffragette Oct 2015 #99
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Bernie Sanders isn't ...»Reply #88