Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: MYSTERY: Why don't Hillary's supporters vote in internet polls??? [View all]OilemFirchen
(7,288 posts)109. Discussing "real" vs. "online" is akin to arguing evolution vs. "Intelligent Design".
Both conversations are, of course, meaningless as they would presume that both "sides" have equal merit.
It begs the question: Why do creationists dominate the Internet, while evolutionists sit on their asses and refuse to participate?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No we don't get easily dazzled like others by huge rallies and we don't need to go to them
hrmjustin
Oct 2015
#10
And that's the problem. After decades of status quo, establishment candidates getting themselves
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#149
So no discussion, no commet. I don't need to be told who to vote for, I know who will work
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#159
Clinton was in the Senate for 8 years, Sanders in Congress/Senate for 25 years.
George II
Oct 2015
#157
Yes, she was. What did she accomplish? Her record is unimpressive, didn't get much done. Sanders
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#162
Sorry, she accomplished more in her 8 years than Sanders did in his 25 years.
George II
Oct 2015
#165
Sigh, The smart thing would be to focus on delegates and not....................................size
uponit7771
Oct 2015
#21
Yeah, evil Hillary is buying everyone in DC et al because everyone except Sanders is corrupt
uponit7771
Oct 2015
#38
"Proximity to power"? Sanders has been in Washington since 1989, Clinton didn't get there...
George II
Oct 2015
#129
Once again, Sanders was elected in 1988 and has been serving in Congress/Senate since 1989...
George II
Oct 2015
#212
Sanders has partipated in the Democratic Caucus (in each house) for 25 years, Clinton for...
George II
Oct 2015
#217
So the consumate outsider is an insider, cuz he was in Washington more calendar days?
AgingAmerican
Oct 2015
#220
You should do some reading about Sanders in Vermont if you want to see "vindictiveness".
George II
Oct 2015
#182
Especially those superdelegates, who don't even have to campaign to go to the convention!
reformist2
Oct 2015
#42
Except for her announcement "rally" she hasn't really had a full-blown rally. She's been....
George II
Oct 2015
#131
With 200 advisers I'm sure they didn't count chicken before they hatched
Cosmic Kitten
Oct 2015
#184
I don't think that's the case at all. She had no problem attracting crowds in 2008, but this still.
George II
Oct 2015
#207
Both she and her opponents (except for Biden) have had no momentum, only minimal....
George II
Oct 2015
#215
She doesn't conduct her rallies "online". "Online" is the point of this OP, not rallies.
George II
Oct 2015
#166
Yes, internet polls do "mean something". They mean the entity conducting them is getting paid...
George II
Oct 2015
#156
As opposed to opinions from pundits that the vast majority of Clinton supporters despised..
frylock
Oct 2015
#177
Obviously Sanders' organizers weren't concerned about buying votes, but they were concerned about...
George II
Oct 2015
#242
Is the 2 million in donations to Sanders since last night also meaningless and dumb?
frylock
Oct 2015
#178
or the portion of the population that is going to rallies, or making donations.
frylock
Oct 2015
#225
Hillary supporters are not scientists, but they understand statistical science.
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#16
Statistical science and random sampling have a long history of development....google it!
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#34
Good for the OP. I'm addressing the lack of statistical understanding in your subthread
Godhumor
Oct 2015
#95
Discussing "real" vs. "online" is akin to arguing evolution vs. "Intelligent Design".
OilemFirchen
Oct 2015
#109
If she was ahead in these polls, you would be shouting from the rooftops
AgingAmerican
Oct 2015
#223
But how come she never wins ANY internet poll? Is the enthusiasm gap THAT bad???
reformist2
Oct 2015
#52
So Hillary supporters just naturally resist the urge to click?? Whereas Bernie supporters can't help
reformist2
Oct 2015
#46
You're entitled to obsess over Internet polls and ignore the other indicators. eom
cprise
Oct 2015
#201
I think a lot of people don't have time to hunt down every internet poll out there.
Zing Zing Zingbah
Oct 2015
#54
'Long Shot' Kucinich Buries Democratic Rivals in Nationwide Poll Among Independent Voters
Freddie Stubbs
Oct 2015
#63
So Hillary's supporters are busy working, whereas Bernie's surf the internet all day? LOL
reformist2
Oct 2015
#103
I'm glad my reply was so funny to you. Arguing in an online forum is not a waste of time to me,
lunamagica
Oct 2015
#145
I'm a Hillary supporter; I know the internet exists; I don't vote in online "polls"
brooklynite
Oct 2015
#116
I'm referring to the people who think online polls are on par with scientific polls
NobodyHere
Oct 2015
#143
Many of us minorities just don't do that. Most of us like Hillary, though. nt
LexVegas
Oct 2015
#136
I honestly haven't voted in one online poll since the debate last night and I am an enthusiastic and
Metric System
Oct 2015
#167