2016 Postmortem

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)

1. GO Bernie GO Bernie GO Bernie

Reply to sabrina 1 (Original post)

Wed Oct 14, 2015, 11:09 PM

Oct 2015

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

37,600 Unscientific Click Donors Raise $1.3 Million for Bernie During Debate! Stats Baby! [View all] sabrina 1 Oct 2015 OP

GO Bernie GO Bernie GO Bernie cherokeeprogressive Oct 2015 #1

remember the old days when the bernie people used to bad mouth $$ in politicis lol. not anymore nt msongs Oct 2015 #2

No, could you link to where Bernie supporters EVER bad mouthed that rare thing, a Politican sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #3

There is a distinction between corporate money buying politicians and us 'common folks' donating ... slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #5

And once again a misrepresentation. Sen Sanders supporters bad mouth the billionaires like rhett o rick Oct 2015 #6

It's just stunning, isn't it? The twisting of facts, or the ATTEMPT to do so. I have learned so sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #11

Remember when msongs used to post in the Bernie Sanders Group? Good times. nt merrily Oct 2015 #34

Nope. We only complained about the corporate money the others get. arcane1 Oct 2015 #8

Distinction-challenged, much? zentrum Oct 2015 #24

Link to a DU post that objects to individual, human, citizens donating $2700 or less to a candidate. merrily Oct 2015 #33

Are you kidding? Dawgs Oct 2015 #40

Sanders receiving a lot of donations doesn't mean Internet click polls are valid polling methods. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #4

Exactly. And here I thought the Democratic party was the party of science. Metric System Oct 2015 #10

Here, here! Pundits zentrum Oct 2015 #26

Sigh. Metric System Oct 2015 #28

No no. Paid pundits on the teevee machine pontificating the conventional wisdom is what matters. frylock Oct 2015 #14

No, proper sampling and controls for duplicates are what matter. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #15

But we don't have that.. frylock Oct 2015 #18

Actually voting that starts in a few months is what really matters. RichVRichV Oct 2015 #35

No, it's mostly bullshit until the actual elections. JackRiddler Oct 2015 #36

It's on the internet. Everyone knows that anything that happens on the internet is 'unscientific' sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #16

No, they wouldn't be. Because they're bullshit online click polls. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #22

Pundits have nothing to do with science either. Metric System Oct 2015 #29

This post is NOT about the click polls. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #43

The "unscientific" part of the OP was in reference to people rightly calling click polls bullshit. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #44

Link, buy something ... slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #7

I'm going to buy the Bernie Baseball cap! sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #17

Wish I looked better in hats, but this would be a great gift for my husband ... slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #20

Campaign donations have zero to due with unscientific online polls. I know you're attempting Metric System Oct 2015 #9

Really? I guess a dozen or so Corporate Media Talking Heads are 'Scientifically qualified to sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #13

OK I'll ask this: Why are Internet polls legitimate in your view? Metric System Oct 2015 #21

They provide an opportunity for PEOPLE, real PEOPLE to express their opinions. Anyone is free to use sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #25

Online polls are crap, even if it shows Hillary winning. People can vote multiple times, including Metric System Oct 2015 #27

Well, you're not going to like some of the 'scientific' polls that have begun to emerge sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #31

The official polls are also very limited. At one point I was taking a lot of official, professional JDPriestly Oct 2015 #32

"and that just makes you look ignorant." NuclearDem Oct 2015 #19

I remember seeing a picture of Gene Wilder ... slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #30

Probably bots.. frylock Oct 2015 #12

Thanks Sabrina. zentrum Oct 2015 #23

K&R. PowerToThePeople Oct 2015 #37

I am sort of loving watching Hillary supporters try to change our perception of reality. Kalidurga Oct 2015 #38

You seem strangely proud of not understanding science mythology Oct 2015 #39

We understand. Anything on the internet is not science. Which is why I said, right in the OP that sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #41

You strangely didn't understand a thing I said, STEM field education can only take you so far... Kalidurga Oct 2015 #45

You seem to think you can score a point artislife Oct 2015 #48

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #42

So which scientific polls categorically show that Clinton won the debate? frylock Oct 2015 #46

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #47

You proved it by waiting artislife Oct 2015 #49

Maybe YOU can answer this question I just can't seem to get an answer to. sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #52

Have you tried posting some polls? Capt. Obvious Oct 2015 #51

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #55

How many donated more than once? Capt. Obvious Oct 2015 #50

You are not counted as 'an individual donor' if you donate more than once. But better question: sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #54

Kick!!! Faux pas Oct 2015 #53