Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Voters Overwhelmingly Say: 'Bernie Winner of Debate!' Corporate Controlled Editors Ignore Them! [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)116. The other (than the most vulnerable) SS recipients may lose out, because
she didn't explain where the help was coming from. Her plan may be to readjust benefits (enhance, I think she called it).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Voters Overwhelmingly Say: 'Bernie Winner of Debate!' Corporate Controlled Editors Ignore Them! [View all]
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
OP
Those polls are indicative of the huge and growing support Sanders is generating, simply by
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#144
Maybe it's because they are attempting to 'control the message', as Hillary herself said 'we
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#119
In other words, Bernie2016TV transmitted something CNN produced that they didn't have rights to...
brooklynite
Oct 2015
#121
So you think the American People do not have rights to the airwaves, especially on
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#122
Did Bernie Sanders insist that the feed be made available to any entity that wanted to transmit it?
brooklynite
Oct 2015
#123
If what you say is true, it should be easy to prove. Show us some "credible news outlets" and "ACTU
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#25
I agree the MSM is full of shit, but where is your proof that EVERYBODY says Bernie won?
randys1
Oct 2015
#2
Umm, who said 'everyone'??? 'Overwhelming numbers who voted in THEIR OWN POLLS.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#6
It should be easy to prove her data wrong, but I haven't seen any proof yet. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#26
Yes, I remember Obama winning those online polls also. And I remember the same snide, remarks. Which
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#10
All your attempts to denigrate people make me laugh, and REMEMBER the exact same garbage re Obama. A
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#12
She has data and so far you have nothing. If true, it should be easy to prove her data wrong. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#27
You are correct, and I have a lot more data I will be posting as soon as I get
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#80
I get the impression that the Clinton wing doesn't really care about People. They are more
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#28
I am guessing that you don't recognize that when it comes down to that, I just
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#99
Oh I am here to stay. Our fight to reduce poverty has just begun. Wish you were on our side. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#111
Why would YOU be looking forward to what Rhett does? Do you KNOW him, have some kind of
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#131
I find it a challenge to try to trick him into actually discussing an issue or committing himself
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#139
Don't see you railing against pundit opinions being posted. Are those any more scientific?
RichVRichV
Oct 2015
#76
He's a leader, she is a follower. That was more than obvious last night as she changed her
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#24
Did anyone capture what she said about issues? For example, while Sen Sanders gave specifics
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#30
Actually, more like she was 'well instructed' by handlers to go for the sound bites which
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#110
It was pure rhetoric. "I want to help the most vulnerable", means nothing. How many is she
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#112
Yes people did notice that. Especially since people are deeply concerned about SS. I kept
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#109
I wish Anderson would have followed up on her expanation of her vote on the Patriot Act.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#113
Yes, Hillary got some support there, but Sanders overwhelmingly was the choice of the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#32
I am glad you finally recognized it. Many are in denial. They can turn their backs on
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#62
Your stalking me is sad but flattering. A vote for HRC is not a vote to fix the
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#77
I know you side with the Wealthy but if HRC wins it will be because they have more money.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#98
I voted for Obama because he came across as a progressive as a candidate.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#115
Yes, Rick. We know you are the arbitrator of who is progressive and who isn't.
zappaman
Oct 2015
#118
What? But of course you do. Are you willing to stand up to the powerful billionaires
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#135
What part of "I don't take orders from you" are you having trouble understanding?
zappaman
Oct 2015
#138
You allare trying to hard to convince us but are you really trying to convince yourself?
hrmjustin
Oct 2015
#35
It is the People vs the Establishment. The establishment controls the message
NorthCarolina
Oct 2015
#49
Well, tell it to the 'Scientfic' Corporate Media who put up their polls, asking VIEWERS to vote.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#84
Well, she seemed to be following Bernie's lead on almost every issue. She may as well just have
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#85
Corporate entities clearly made a decision to push a STRONGLY pro-Clinton narrative post debate.
stillwaiting
Oct 2015
#92
Sorry, but it's now known that not just polls, but every focus group,, statistic taken,
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#97
Truly the last person I thought I would see promoting the corporate media agenda.
NCTraveler
Oct 2015
#117
Thanks, I've come to the conclusion now that Corporate owned politicians are 'allowed' to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#137