Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Voters Overwhelmingly Say: 'Bernie Winner of Debate!' Corporate Controlled Editors Ignore Them! [View all]zappaman
(20,627 posts)120. Awesome!
I look forward to your support of the Democratic nominee!
Hopefully he or she will have a "nice smile" so those of us who aren't as smart as you, will vote!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Voters Overwhelmingly Say: 'Bernie Winner of Debate!' Corporate Controlled Editors Ignore Them! [View all]
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
OP
Those polls are indicative of the huge and growing support Sanders is generating, simply by
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#144
Maybe it's because they are attempting to 'control the message', as Hillary herself said 'we
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#119
In other words, Bernie2016TV transmitted something CNN produced that they didn't have rights to...
brooklynite
Oct 2015
#121
So you think the American People do not have rights to the airwaves, especially on
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#122
Did Bernie Sanders insist that the feed be made available to any entity that wanted to transmit it?
brooklynite
Oct 2015
#123
If what you say is true, it should be easy to prove. Show us some "credible news outlets" and "ACTU
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#25
I agree the MSM is full of shit, but where is your proof that EVERYBODY says Bernie won?
randys1
Oct 2015
#2
Umm, who said 'everyone'??? 'Overwhelming numbers who voted in THEIR OWN POLLS.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#6
It should be easy to prove her data wrong, but I haven't seen any proof yet. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#26
Yes, I remember Obama winning those online polls also. And I remember the same snide, remarks. Which
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#10
All your attempts to denigrate people make me laugh, and REMEMBER the exact same garbage re Obama. A
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#12
She has data and so far you have nothing. If true, it should be easy to prove her data wrong. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#27
You are correct, and I have a lot more data I will be posting as soon as I get
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#80
I get the impression that the Clinton wing doesn't really care about People. They are more
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#28
I am guessing that you don't recognize that when it comes down to that, I just
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#99
Oh I am here to stay. Our fight to reduce poverty has just begun. Wish you were on our side. nm
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#111
Why would YOU be looking forward to what Rhett does? Do you KNOW him, have some kind of
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#131
I find it a challenge to try to trick him into actually discussing an issue or committing himself
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#139
Don't see you railing against pundit opinions being posted. Are those any more scientific?
RichVRichV
Oct 2015
#76
He's a leader, she is a follower. That was more than obvious last night as she changed her
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#24
Did anyone capture what she said about issues? For example, while Sen Sanders gave specifics
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#30
Actually, more like she was 'well instructed' by handlers to go for the sound bites which
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#110
It was pure rhetoric. "I want to help the most vulnerable", means nothing. How many is she
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#112
Yes people did notice that. Especially since people are deeply concerned about SS. I kept
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#109
I wish Anderson would have followed up on her expanation of her vote on the Patriot Act.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#113
Yes, Hillary got some support there, but Sanders overwhelmingly was the choice of the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#32
I am glad you finally recognized it. Many are in denial. They can turn their backs on
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#62
Your stalking me is sad but flattering. A vote for HRC is not a vote to fix the
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#77
I know you side with the Wealthy but if HRC wins it will be because they have more money.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#98
I voted for Obama because he came across as a progressive as a candidate.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#115
Yes, Rick. We know you are the arbitrator of who is progressive and who isn't.
zappaman
Oct 2015
#118
What? But of course you do. Are you willing to stand up to the powerful billionaires
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#135
What part of "I don't take orders from you" are you having trouble understanding?
zappaman
Oct 2015
#138
You allare trying to hard to convince us but are you really trying to convince yourself?
hrmjustin
Oct 2015
#35
It is the People vs the Establishment. The establishment controls the message
NorthCarolina
Oct 2015
#49
Well, tell it to the 'Scientfic' Corporate Media who put up their polls, asking VIEWERS to vote.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#84
Well, she seemed to be following Bernie's lead on almost every issue. She may as well just have
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#85
Corporate entities clearly made a decision to push a STRONGLY pro-Clinton narrative post debate.
stillwaiting
Oct 2015
#92
Sorry, but it's now known that not just polls, but every focus group,, statistic taken,
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#97
Truly the last person I thought I would see promoting the corporate media agenda.
NCTraveler
Oct 2015
#117
Thanks, I've come to the conclusion now that Corporate owned politicians are 'allowed' to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#137