2016 Postmortem

shenmue

(38,610 posts)

51. Wow, Salon gets off the anti-Hillary shtick for once

Reply to JaneyVee (Original post)

Thu Oct 15, 2015, 02:29 PM

Oct 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

99 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Sanders truthers, step down: There�s no conspiracy to hide that he �won� the debate [View all] JaneyVee Oct 2015 OP

LOL! I always enjoy Senator Sanders slapping down foolishness from his 'supporters.' onehandle Oct 2015 #1

??? Fawke Em Oct 2015 #4

+1 n/t Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #6

LOL - accusatory non sequiturs are very much in vogue now w/ Hillary shills. -nt- 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #22

+1000 n/t MissDeeds Oct 2015 #47

The newest meme is to present lies as facts using non sequitur examples. Fearless Oct 2015 #43

It works, too, until you hit the social media hub. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #91

Diagnostic: Hallucination. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #86

Calling supporters of any candidate names isn't going to win them over. Major Hogwash Oct 2015 #2

I agree it's not a conspiracy. Just shallow pack-behavior from the elites. Armstead Oct 2015 #3

Liberal bloggers aren't "elites". JaneyVee Oct 2015 #5

Chris Matthews, Chuck Todd, NYT, WaPo, etc. etc., etc. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #9

Yeah, NYT is totally in the tank for HRC. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #13

Of course it isn't. Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #33

Apparently you missed this from the pages of the NYT tularetom Oct 2015 #53

The first line of that op-ed? "Hillary Clinton crushed it! There is no other way for me to put it." That Guy 888 Oct 2015 #69

DU enid602 Oct 2015 #10

"paid too much given the quality" - maybe they're in bed with those losers erronis Oct 2015 #42

Liberal boggers are all over the map on it Armstead Oct 2015 #12

And that's fine. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #92

+1,000 n/t Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #7

This!! Fawke Em Oct 2015 #11

You think the NYTimes, a paper who has plastered their front page JaneyVee Oct 2015 #15

Boggles the mind, doesn't it? mcar Oct 2015 #24

Oh, you understand journalism? Fawke Em Oct 2015 #39

I've been a PR professional for 35 mcar Oct 2015 #49

I've been an F1 driver for 10 years then got bored and am now an astronaut. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #72

Isn't that lovely mcar Oct 2015 #73

It is indeed! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #76

OK... but were you ever a reporter? Fawke Em Oct 2015 #93

Yes because of access. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #38

Yeah, that's totally what the NYT is doing. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #50

Another opinion about opinions that proves nothing. Dawgs Oct 2015 #8

What we see in the media is shock RobertEarl Oct 2015 #14

M$M's habit of ignoring Bernie has clearly not worked, and you're right, they are shocked 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #28

I love the inter-webs RobertEarl Oct 2015 #95

You are correct. HRC won in the eyes of the Billionaires but not the People. rhett o rick Oct 2015 #16

Where are you getting 80-15? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #25

CNN's Facebook poll, I think. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #31

LOL. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #34

Something something Goldman Sachs something something the People. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #30

I'll simply refer you to another OP 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #17

If you believe online polls I have nothing to say to you. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #20

We won, we won, we won artislife Oct 2015 #27

"5 more" Android3.14 Oct 2015 #56

. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #41

Unless they favor Clinton, which they do not AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #64

Oh look at all the unscientific BS internet push polls that a few hundred workinclasszero Oct 2015 #23

Push Polls 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #37

Those numbers are so unbalanced you'd have to live under a dictatorship to think they're normal. Metric System Oct 2015 #35

. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #44

Let's put it this way...even people who didn't watch the debate could vote, including multiple times Metric System Oct 2015 #48

LOL!!! Oh sure, Hillary was the victim of another conspiracy! Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #65

"could vote, including multiple times if they felt inclined." BeanMusical Oct 2015 #75

They can't help it passiveporcupine Oct 2015 #67

Why are Hillary supporters so obsessed with "disproving" the validity of these online polls? virtualobserver Oct 2015 #18

"Who cares" is precisely my opinion. Blue_In_AK Oct 2015 #26

Because people are using unscientific bullshit to attempt to shape public opinion. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #32

Indeed, pundit blathering is extremely unscientific Fumesucker Oct 2015 #36

They do not see it. They can't artislife Oct 2015 #71

Blindsight Fumesucker Oct 2015 #97

Gee, Fume, that sounds kind of....scientific! nt artislife Oct 2015 #99

people are also promoting blathering pundits in an attemot to shaoe public opinion virtualobserver Oct 2015 #60

I'm not a Clinton supporter (I don't care who wins) mythology Oct 2015 #57

it isn't incorrect.....it measures something.....it measures intensity virtualobserver Oct 2015 #62

Word on the street is...its a vast DLC conspiracy workinclasszero Oct 2015 #19

The MSM couldn't wait to declare Hillary the loser. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #21

Roflmao!!! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #80

No, it's the Establishment being the establisment.... paleotn Oct 2015 #63

Yep. "They paid good money... ". LOL. GoneFishin Oct 2015 #94

More foaming flamebait whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #29

Bernie didn't even show up Cali_Democrat Oct 2015 #40

Why is the bird in your avatar shitting on Obama? BeanMusical Oct 2015 #83

Amanda Marcotte at Salon is not even close to being an objective voice on this issue. Maedhros Oct 2015 #45

Corporations would never do that! AgingAmerican Oct 2015 #46

Wow, Salon gets off the anti-Hillary shtick for once shenmue Oct 2015 #51

We know that Clinton won the debate with the Corporate Media. There was some evidence that Sanders Bernblu Oct 2015 #52

And there goes Amanda Marcotte under the bus for not drinking the Kool-Aid... stevenleser Oct 2015 #54

Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #55

( ._.) Marty McGraw Oct 2015 #58

a little more for good measure MisterP Oct 2015 #66

because i believe in transparency....... restorefreedom Oct 2015 #59

Yeah! Wots up wit dat? Accusing the pundits of conspiracy? Unknown Beatle Oct 2015 #61

LOL. I love this stuff! Keep digging your own grave, corporate media! n/t mhatrw Oct 2015 #68

Agreed Aerows Oct 2015 #70

I'll use lots and lots of "scare quotes", Marcotte sniffs Matariki Oct 2015 #74

It was hilarious watching them try to sell online polls. hrmjustin Oct 2015 #77

"It was hilarious watching them try to sell onoine polls." BeanMusical Oct 2015 #81

Absolutely nothing. I particularly like red onion polls. hrmjustin Oct 2015 #82

OK, but there's also nothing hilarious about it. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #84

Mea culpa! hrmjustin Oct 2015 #85

I forgive you my son. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #87

This is too funny. hrmjustin Oct 2015 #88

Lol, yes it is. BeanMusical Oct 2015 #89

Do you feel better for floriduck Oct 2015 #78

Posted to for later. 1StrongBlackMan Oct 2015 #79

Of course there is. Media bias and propaganda. WDIM Oct 2015 #90

Marcotte: sinister scheming Papists behind claims of dislike of Clinton MisterP Oct 2015 #96

If we believe the media, Bush won all the debates in 2000 jfern Oct 2015 #98