Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: If Facebook likes or votes mean nothing, why did Hillary spend $630,000 on [View all]StevieM
(10,578 posts)66. It's not that they don't mean anything, it's just that they can't be accurately used to proclaim who
won a given debate.
You need to use scientific sampling methods that are part of established polling methods.
I have seen a couple of scientific polls since the debate, one which had Sanders winning, the other had Clinton winning.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
106 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Facebook likes or votes mean nothing, why did Hillary spend $630,000 on [View all]
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
OP
The wasting of the peoples's money on Facebook is just symptomatic and a probable
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#25
Incredible, isn't it? I used to think doubling down on being wrong was just a RW thing......
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#40
Bernie has social media interest growing like wildfire, just like his grassroots campaign
peacebird
Oct 2015
#2
I agree, peacebird, there is no mistake regarding the Internet's impact, people that do so
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#28
She has 60% unfavorable numbers nationally for a reason. Denying it won't do any of us any good.
reformist2
Oct 2015
#54
That's not the subject of the OP, here's another link if it makes you feel better.
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#12
Well that's a mistake on your part, I don't frequent it. I just Googled DU for a previous thread
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#19
you have a problem with Spanish in the high school curriculum? Same site is whining about that.
wyldwolf
Oct 2015
#17
I don't need to now, apparently they changed it but I'm curious about the second question on
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#26
annnnnnd crickets. i love it. some hillary supporters always seem to do this. n/t
retrowire
Oct 2015
#41
I've asked this same question five times on D.U. and nobody has an answer or they don't want
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#43
IF Hillary had the support Bernie has on Social Media and all over the country, you can be sure
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#15
Nor the 10 seconds it would presumably take you to post the link you must already have. n/t
ColesCountyDem
Oct 2015
#96
It's interesting that you found such a thing, because a Google search doesn't return it.
ColesCountyDem
Oct 2015
#98
As a Hillary supporter I can assure you that if someone pointed to an unscientific poll
StevieM
Oct 2015
#65
Facebook is just one segment of the Internet which as an Institution overwhelmingly believed
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#31
The Internet is an Institution that's not stating that all aspects of it are the same but the
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#58
The Bernie crowd is comparing the number of people who follow him on social media..
frylock
Oct 2015
#80
Oops! Lol! Thank you Uncle Joe! Good question. More of that hypocrisy we see now on a regular
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#52
It's not that they don't mean anything, it's just that they can't be accurately used to proclaim who
StevieM
Oct 2015
#66
I've seen that Gravis poll, many people here don't have great faith in their integrity,
Uncle Joe
Oct 2015
#83