Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(65,268 posts)
41. The OP clearly shows amendments by Bernie that became law, those amendments were a great benefit
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 05:16 PM
Oct 2015

to the people whether he was running for President or not.

Most of Bernie's amendments were made prior to Bernie ever running for President, he was just being consistent.

It may be hard work but if you're truly interested you can find Amendments that Bernie promoted that did in fact become law or at the very least passed through a committee that he was a member of and this for the most part in a Republican controlled Congress.

Aside from Bernie's numerous amendments and activism, another sign of Bernie's leadership was in co-founding and chairing for eight years the Congressional Progressive Caucus, its currently the largest membership organization within the Democratic Caucus in the United States Congress with 69 declared members.



During his first year in the House, Sanders often alienated allies and colleagues with his criticism of both political parties as tools of the wealthy.[17] In 1991, Sanders co-founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and chaired the group of mostly liberal Democrats for its first eight years.

(snip)

Polling conducted in August 2011 by Public Policy Polling found that Sanders's approval rating was 67% and his disapproval rating 28%, making him then the third-most popular senator in the country.[87] Both the NAACP and the NHLA have given Sanders 100 percent voting scores during his tenure in the Senate.[88]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders





The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is the largest membership organization within the Democratic Caucus in the United States Congress with 69 declared members.[4] The CPC is a left-leaning organization that works to advance progressive and liberal issues and positions.[5][6][7]

The CPC is currently co-chaired by U.S. Representatives Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN). It was founded in 1991 and has grown steadily since then, having more recently added 20 members since 2005 and having hired its first full-time Executive Director, Bill Goold, in May of that year. Subsequent Executive Directors have included Andrea Miller (2009-2011) and Brad Bauman (2011-2014). The current Executive Director is Mike Darner. Of the 20 standing committees of the House in the 111th Congress, 10 were chaired by members of the CPC. Those chairmen were replaced when the Republicans took control of the House in the 112th Congress.


The first in a legislative package of more than a dozen separate bills that were offered was the Job Creation and Invest in America Act of 1995 to stimulate economic growth in the American economy. It would have provided $63.6 billion/year and created at least one million new jobs/year in each of the first two years that the bill would have been in effect. Roughly 2/3 of that total would have gone for new federal outlays and the remaining 1/3 would have provided tax relief to middle and low-income working families. The prescribed $41.6 billion in federal outlays would have been spent for a combination of new investments in physical infrastructure and to help targeted Americans in need as follows:

$10 billion for repairing highways and bridges;
$1.6 billion for improving/expanding mass transit systems;
$1 billion for airport improvements;
$1 billion to upgrade rail travel/freight shipping;
$4 billion for construction of new water and sewage treatment facilities;
$4 billion for environmental clean-up at military and U.S. Energy Department facilities;
$4 billion for economic development projects in major cities, towns and neighborhoods;
$3 billion for improving existing schools/libraries and building new ones;
$1 billion for energy efficiency improvements in federal buildings;
$1 billion for community developments banks in low-income communities to stimulate targeted lending and local economic development projects;
$2 billion to train low-income Americans for careers in disseminating basic health care and disease prevention information;
$1 billion for youth apprenticeship training programs serving 14-21 year olds;
$2.5 billion for hiring new teachers, tutors, and specially-trained instructors to improve school standards;
$4 billion for Head Start to cover all eligible 3-5 year olds;
$900 million for community-based efforts to prevent AIDS, breast and cervical cancer, tuberculosis, and lead exposure;
$400 million to expand migrant and homeless health centers;
$100 million for states and communities to train local residents to provide health and disease prevention materials; and
$100 million for scholarships and loan programs for doctors and nurse practitioners in under-served communities.
The prescribed tax relief for working families would have included:

$16 billion in tax credits equal to 20% of a worker's FICA contribution, capped at $200/individual; and
$6 billion in tax credits up to $6,000/year for first-time homebuyers with an annual income of $62,000 or less.
All of the new spending and tax relief would have been fully paid for by eliminating tax loopholes that reward U.S.-based transnational corporations for investing abroad and exporting U.S. jobs and through carefully targeted tax increases that would have been levied on the unearned income of upper-income Americans. These revenue raisers of $85.3 - $95.3 billion/year would have kicked in the third year after enactment and would have remained in effect thereafter. They broke down as follows:

$16.5 billion by changing the foreign tax credit to a deduction;
$1.6 billion by eliminating deferral of income from controlled foreign corporations;
$28.7 billion from crackdown on transfer pricing by transnational corporations;
$30–40 billion from .25% tax each time stock ownership is transferred;
$7.0 billion from terminating preferred tax treatment of capital gains relative to earned income; and
$1.5-$2.2 billion from capital gains tax on inherited investment (i.e. eliminate stepped up basis at death.)[9]
Additional path-breaking bills in the package included:

The Public Interest Legislature Act to strengthen the financial disclosure requirements on Members of Congress and professional staff, especially detailing exact sources and amounts of unearned income, securities holdings, and other assets and to require that Members of Congress place their stocks, bonds, and other securities as well as real property holdings in blind trusts upon taking office as a good conduct measure and to require that Members of Congress divest themselves of any substantial asset in relation to his/her respective committee assignments which could pose a direct financial conflict of interest with the work and actions of those committees;
The Fiscal Fairness Act to permit the Congress to waive the provisions of a Balanced Budget Amendment,(if adopted),in any fiscal year in which the national unemployment rate exceeds 4%. Also would restore progressivity in federal income tax code to its condition in the late 1970s, prior to enactment of the Reagan tax cuts;
The Equal Justice Before the Law Act—to crackdown on white collar crime (e.g. levy stiff penalties in conjunction with savings and loan bailout; ban on bidding by companies that defraud federal government on procurement contracts; impose criminal penalties for willful violation of child labor laws by employers that result in serious bodily injury or death of minors in the workplace; treat child labor imports as contraband; and eliminate deductibility of legal expenses when a company is accused of a crime);
The Corporate Responsibility Act—to eliminate wide array of special interest subsidies and tax expenditures of benefit to many of America's largest corporations, thus ending corporate welfare and requiring companies to internalize their costs of production rather than continue to foist them on the general public;
The Family Support Act—to strengthen child support compliance, including going after the financial assets of well-to-do non-custodial parents; toughening domestic violence and child abuse laws and prosecution; identifying ways in which to get unwed teenage fathers as well as unwed teenage mothers to own up to their responsibilities; and exploring ways to establish some measure of media liability for gratuitous violence that is deliberately incited by movies and other forms of mass media;
The American Homemakers and Caregivers Act—to target savings incentives and IRAs on middle and low-income Americans. Special provisions designed to extend generous IRA contribution options to spouses who stay home to nurture children during their first six years of life, thus recognizing the importance of parental child rearing and financially rewarding young spouses who give this responsibility top priority during some of their prime earning years outside of the home. Allow middle and low-income Americans to make penalty-free IRA withdrawals for home health care, education expenses, or to start a small business;
The National Economic Security Act—to substantially cut the Pentagon and CIA budgets and Star Wars funding to shift resources to meet domestic social needs and long-term investments to strengthen the U.S. national economy and competitiveness;
The Export American Products, Not American Jobs Act—to eliminate a wide array of tax and trade incentives (e.g. foreign tax credit) and taxpayer-financed programs (e..g. EX-IM Bank, Overseas Private Investment Corporation insurance and loans) that encourage and reward U.S.-based transnational corporations for investing and producing overseas rather than in new plants, jobs, and equipment in the U.S.; and
The Taking Back Our Congress Act—to strengthen lobbying restrictions and to reform campaign finance laws to redress influence-peddling and special interest lobbying inside Congress. Also prohibit U.S. government officials (e..g. trade negotiators) from lobbying on behalf of foreign governments and companies. Plus authorize voluntary public financing of congressional elections and make it easier for independent candidates to run for federal office.[10]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Progressive_Caucus





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bernie manages to get a lot done! peacebird Oct 2015 #1
He's gotten a lot of things done jfern Oct 2015 #2
Kicked, rec'd and bookmarked with thanks n/t Catherina Oct 2015 #3
Here is a list of Bernie Sanders sponsored bills that passed Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #4
Unfortunately, most have never made it out of committee BainsBane Oct 2015 #7
Apparently you didn't read the article Oilwellian Oct 2015 #42
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You For The Thread Uncle Joe !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #5
This is all new to me BainsBane Oct 2015 #6
Here you go Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #8
YES! Thanks for this list of amendments! rosesaylavee Oct 2015 #11
Again, the issue is what has been passed BainsBane Oct 2015 #16
As I said "There are more pages to check out on this as well." The first page which I posted Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #19
There is an option for amendments BainsBane Oct 2015 #20
These bills made it out of Bernie's committee, many of them became law and again this is just from Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #23
Thanks Uncle Joe! BeanMusical Oct 2015 #26
You're misunderstanding the status section BainsBane Oct 2015 #31
Many of the ones that I bolded state, "Became Law" the others made it out of Bernie's committee. n/t Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #32
Did you read my post? BainsBane Oct 2015 #34
Bernie either sponsored/co-sponsored and or made amendments to those bills, Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #36
This will be my last post in the thread BainsBane Oct 2015 #39
The OP clearly shows amendments by Bernie that became law, those amendments were a great benefit Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #41
I would love to see a credit roll of these bills on a Bernie campaign commercial some day soon. DrBulldog Oct 2015 #37
you are blaming your lack of information on sanders' supporters? noiretextatique Oct 2015 #14
No, it isn't BainsBane Oct 2015 #18
Voting for Hillary means zalinda Oct 2015 #38
K&R jwirr Oct 2015 #9
Thanks for the thread Uncle Joe rosesaylavee Oct 2015 #10
I agree, rosesylavee, Bernie knows how to make government work even under adverse conditions Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #12
Bernie does know govt. for real. Thanks for posting on Bernie's long legislative record Uncle Joe. appalachiablue Oct 2015 #21
K&R - Poof! There goes another favorite Hillary support meme. -nt- 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #13
they really do think that when we answer their charges with the facts (and CSPAN videos) MisterP Oct 2015 #17
K & R! SoapBox Oct 2015 #15
A wink is as good as a nod to a blind man marym625 Oct 2015 #24
not even a little bit surprised marym625 Oct 2015 #22
Kick and R BeanMusical Oct 2015 #25
Thanks, Uncle Joe! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #27
I believe he/she will come around, it can be difficult to get past emotional clutter, Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #29
That's good news but his service in Congress and Senate is how much more that Hillary's stint? nt kelliekat44 Oct 2015 #28
Post #23 just lists from the last Congress, it's only the tip of the Bernie Iceberg. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #30
Hillary will be too polarizing to get anything passed that's not a benefit to corporations, IMHO grahamhgreen Oct 2015 #33
The same story with Hillary's Secretary of State "accomplishments", too. DrBulldog Oct 2015 #35
Bernie needs to run as a dealmaker too, since he has a long proven track record of doing so. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #40
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders’ record of...»Reply #41