Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The debate: according to MNSBC, Sanders email complaint was rehearsed -- and not intended [View all]Fla Dem
(27,634 posts)146. You have no way to know what he intended. I take it at face value.
And the fact he prefaced his remarks by saying this is probably politically incorrect leads me to believe we interpreted his remarks as he meant them to be understood.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The debate: according to MNSBC, Sanders email complaint was rehearsed -- and not intended [View all]
pnwmom
Oct 2015
OP
This isn't an attack, and I am not in either camp. I just thought it was interesting. n/t
pnwmom
Oct 2015
#2
unbelievably ungrateful if that is what they think. It got the pigs off her back
roguevalley
Oct 2015
#118
If Sanders had intended the remark as a critique, the timing was rather poor....and the debate
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#18
Most of us techies don't obsess about the emails, but to about the callous nature
LiberalArkie
Oct 2015
#36
Sorry, that is an apple situation, I was talking about oranges. Not the same. OH sorry, they
LiberalArkie
Oct 2015
#105
The difference is who gets to bear the burden of responsibility. Hillary unnecessarily
A Simple Game
Oct 2015
#140
You apparently didn't read the piece at the link. This is not about "supporters."
MADem
Oct 2015
#61
This is not about "Hillary supporters" though--it's about some jerk appearing on Morning Joe,
MADem
Oct 2015
#84
There's no question that the written source is a conservative nutjob, and the on-air source has
MADem
Oct 2015
#90
Where did it say Hillary's supporters" . It was a reporter on Morning Jerk who said it.
Fla Dem
Oct 2015
#141
You could have clicked the link and had the full picture in less time than it took to type that post
MADem
Oct 2015
#63
In the opinion of a reporter in Joe's show, whose name you don't even know...
IanBrownie
Oct 2015
#108
It's Mark Halperin, that little weasel who used to write for TIME years ago and fleeted up to
MADem
Oct 2015
#117
The only problem I have with Hillary's email problem is that it glaringly illustrates how very
djean111
Oct 2015
#7
The Sanders fans who have carried the GOP water on Egazhi were disappointed to hear Sanders
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#125
Where is the Hillary camp doing anything to further this idiocy along? Please show us. nt
Fla Dem
Oct 2015
#145
The intention was extremely clear to everyone but a reporter you can't name and whom
Bluenorthwest
Oct 2015
#24
Did you even watch? Bernie even prefaced it by saying it wasn't good politics to defend an opponent!
reformist2
Oct 2015
#16
yes, I did watch and I do recall--and have often rea that comment. What is your point?
riversedge
Oct 2015
#21
The point is that Sanders said that what he was gonna say "may not be great politics"
Vattel
Oct 2015
#55
Well, we will never know if your 'natural interpretation" is correct or not unless Sanders
riversedge
Oct 2015
#76
Yes, and until we know with certainty, let's talk about things that might have happened
Vattel
Oct 2015
#83
Polling shows this was the only memorable line, so Camp Hillary needs to undermine it. Sad. Grim.
reformist2
Oct 2015
#14
there is no 'camp hillary' that is undermining it. It was reported in an opinion
riversedge
Oct 2015
#25
Who I maintain is a member of Camp Hillary. She's prolly hoping to be White House press secretary.
reformist2
Oct 2015
#49
The original source is a reporter who was suspended for calling Obama a "dick" on MSNBC.
beam me up scottie
Oct 2015
#78
"A reporter on MSNBC'S "Morning Joe" said Sanders' remark had been rehearsed"
madfloridian
Oct 2015
#20
Nonsense. See video: Bernie Tells Reporter Why He Won't Attack Clinton -->
AtomicKitten
Oct 2015
#26
I'd like to say it was brilliant political jujitsu, but I honestly believe it was sincerity.
AtomicKitten
Oct 2015
#44
Hillary Clinton might just be the most clever and adroit debater since this gentleman.
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#27
Morning Joe? bullshit. They obviously don't have any idea about Bernie and who he is.
still_one
Oct 2015
#35
HAHAHA!!! Talk about spin. The last report was that Bernie did not prep for the debate.
Motown_Johnny
Oct 2015
#38
"Halperin: Sanders’ E-mail Comment Was Supposed To Be a ‘Condemnation,’ Not an Exoneration"
ucrdem
Oct 2015
#42
Mark Halperin wa suspended by MSNBC for calling President Obama a "dick":
beam me up scottie
Oct 2015
#45
"Mark Halperin blasted Hillary Clinton" about her response to the email scandal:
beam me up scottie
Oct 2015
#46
I know you do and you deserve respect for supporting her without smearing other candidates.
beam me up scottie
Oct 2015
#57
That doesnt make sense considering that Sanders opened by saying "this may not be politically smart"
DCBob
Oct 2015
#54
This post wins the daily "Silly Season"award for reasons that should be clear to you by now.
Vattel
Oct 2015
#59
Kathleen Parker,a flower of conservative southern punditry, cites unnamed reported w/ unnamed source
aikoaiko
Oct 2015
#65
It was a crap line if it was a scripted hit, in which case it's a credit to Sanders either way.
ucrdem
Oct 2015
#94
The writer had her own way of interpreting what Bernie intended and what Hillary achieved...
cascadiance
Oct 2015
#68
What is "dishonest" about the post? Did you click the link? If you had, you would have read
MADem
Oct 2015
#93
Yes, the OP is doing Sanders a great service bringing these ridiculous claims here to be debunked
Fumesucker
Oct 2015
#95
The OP is reporting on a story that a conservative wingnut is shopping, quoting a broadcast media
MADem
Oct 2015
#103
A lame and desperate attempt to smear Bernie for pushing back against the media harping on the
GoneFishin
Oct 2015
#104
He also called Obama a "dick" on MSNBC so yes, let's cite him as a credible source on DU!
beam me up scottie
Oct 2015
#114
Based on his ability to get inside information for GAME CHANGE and DOUBLE DOWN? Yes.
brooklynite
Oct 2015
#123
Maybe that is true and maybe not. I believe Bernie's heart was in the right place and he
Tipperary
Oct 2015
#120