2016 Postmortem

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)

116. My pleasure Uncle Joe. nt

Reply to Uncle Joe (Reply #74)

Fri Oct 23, 2015, 03:24 AM

Oct 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

117 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"New Rules" Rigged To Elect Darlings of the Billionaire Class [View all] 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 OP

Disgusting 99Forever Oct 2015 #1

Democracy bought and paid for. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #2

HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #3

You're welcome WillyT. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #7

Well... I Just Ran Across Something That Might Give The Clinton Camp New Worry... WillyT Oct 2015 #10

I wonder if Ms. Smith will be "allowed" to be in the Hearing Room tomorrow? -nt- 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #18

ah yes, Ms. Patricia Smith onenote Oct 2015 #25

I'm a Bernie supporter but I think this is low. tecelote Oct 2015 #31

I'm a Bernie supporter too. And you're right. onenote Oct 2015 #32

Agree. Really sad. glinda Oct 2015 #51

She also accused Pres.Obama of murdering her son. sufrommich Oct 2015 #39

Never Heard Of The Woman Til I Ran Across The Article... Why Would CNN Have Her On ??? WillyT Oct 2015 #53

because CNN is in the business of generating sensationalistic headines? onenote Oct 2015 #59

Gee... I dunno. Agschmid Oct 2015 #68

She's a right winger, my condolences for her loss, but Benghazi is on Republicans JRLeft Oct 2015 #64

The right hates Hillary. The fringe left hates Hillary... SidDithers Oct 2015 #70

Whatever else artislife Oct 2015 #84

I wonder MyNameGoesHere Oct 2015 #40

Glad you asked. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #79

He is SO much busier than Hillary... senz Oct 2015 #110

BASH BASH BASH Hillary, BASH BASH BASH randys1 Oct 2015 #4

Hint: this is a Primary Election. Facts are stubborn things. Get over it. 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #5

I know. artislife Oct 2015 #87

You will see these long before THAT ever happens. hifiguy Oct 2015 #90

Oddly artislife Oct 2015 #91

LOL! hifiguy Oct 2015 #93

It's not bashing when the facts speak for themselves. HerbChestnut Oct 2015 #6

IS TOO! hifiguy Oct 2015 #92

Go ahead and vote for Big Pharma, health insurance profiteers... Yurovsky Oct 2015 #15

It is perpetuating the oligarchies rule! Dustlawyer Oct 2015 #62

In the manner of Winston Smith, hifiguy Oct 2015 #94

We need to get this crap out of the way Aerows Oct 2015 #20

it's more important retrowire Oct 2015 #29

that's some really pathetic deflection there stupidicus Oct 2015 #46

You post that every time someone here hifiguy Oct 2015 #83

What I am doing is fighting Karl Rove randys1 Oct 2015 #96

In your mind, maybe. hifiguy Oct 2015 #97

Nah, the candidate I support is Bernie Sanders. But I can see why you are blind to that. randys1 Oct 2015 #98

If you support Bernie, good on ya, m8. hifiguy Oct 2015 #100

He also said randys1 Oct 2015 #101

My primary problem with HRH, though I have a long list, hifiguy Oct 2015 #103

Yes. artislife Oct 2015 #85

Why is it bashing? The donor information is true. n/t Avalux Oct 2015 #106

. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #8

Amused by your own candidate's duplicity? 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #14

Amused by BS bashing by the author of the piece. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #16

Revealing to me, how any fact uttered that reflects poorly on your candidate is called "bashing" 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #19

. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #24

of course they can't dispute the facts stupidicus Oct 2015 #44

Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #9

But she's the only one we can count on to reform campaign finance and money's influence!!1 arcane1 Oct 2015 #11

Who's better than industry to regulate itself. That's the Clinton/Third Way demand way. JRLeft Oct 2015 #27

Who better to appoint as security for the chicken coop hifiguy Oct 2015 #95

Perfect cartoon, hifiguy. senz Oct 2015 #111

and some Dems really expect her to regulate the banks and repeal Citizens United? liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #12

I don't think they care what she does. senz Oct 2015 #112

i will add it to my list restorefreedom Oct 2015 #13

Wait.. This isn't a Maher thread? Fumesucker Oct 2015 #17

? We're evil, but not obsessively so. ? Half-Century Man Oct 2015 #33

Hey, Fridays are casual evil days. hifiguy Oct 2015 #88

This seems to be GREAT NEWS! (Is she or her campaign breaking any laws?) NurseJackie Oct 2015 #21

SCOTUS "legalized" blatant corruption with CU, in case you didn't notice 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #22

She's smart. She's playing by the rules we currently have. Good for her! NurseJackie Oct 2015 #26

So you seriously believe her Billionaire Donors will not want favors in return 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #30

I'm not at all certain that I agree with the premise � NurseJackie Oct 2015 #34

No, what is "just plain silly" is insinuating that Hillary somehow "outfoxed" Bernie 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #37

Actually, it seems as though Bernie has outfoxed himself. NurseJackie Oct 2015 #47

Yes "Sensible Woodchucks" tend to support "serious" candidates, meaning 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #52

That's true, politics ain't pretty � NurseJackie Oct 2015 #55

Yes, we can agree to disagree. Have a nice day 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #57

They have to do what the voters want treestar Oct 2015 #61

If there ever is "an objectionable donor to Bernie" 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #63

"I'd rather have a Democrat "owing favors" instead of a Republican" dorkzilla Oct 2015 #41

Time will tell. NurseJackie Oct 2015 #50

"of course it's a team sports mentality. That's just the way it is" dorkzilla Oct 2015 #67

There was a day at the Bastille Fairgo Oct 2015 #71

I'm not sure how this is a valid comparison � NurseJackie Oct 2015 #73

Living in a socially constructed reality Fairgo Oct 2015 #105

Yes, I do. NurseJackie Oct 2015 #107

Good on ya Fairgo Oct 2015 #108

Actually, I'm dismissive of flawed and mistaken ideas � NurseJackie Oct 2015 #72

More dismissiveness, that�s good! dorkzilla Oct 2015 #75

Umm, okay. So does that mean that I win? :-/ NurseJackie Oct 2015 #76

Nice comment -- intelligent and principled. nt senz Oct 2015 #113

What favors? treestar Oct 2015 #60

That's not "smart." Fawke Em Oct 2015 #80

Potato, po-tah-to � NurseJackie Oct 2015 #82

Agree 100%. The playing field has changed since Citizens United. Laser102 Oct 2015 #36

The reason it is legal is because the lobbyists buy the politicians to write the laws that favor liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #56

+ 100 nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #58

If it's legal to accept bribes - and that is what they are - hifiguy Oct 2015 #86

That's all we have to work with, right now. NurseJackie Oct 2015 #89

Gotcha. We must support unalloyed evil iin the form of unlimited bribery and corruption hifiguy Oct 2015 #99

Your analogy is a bit clumsy, but I understand the point you're trying to make. NurseJackie Oct 2015 #102

Facts Do Not Equal Bashing colsohlibgal Oct 2015 #23

rationalizing bad behavior on Hillary's part is easy olddots Oct 2015 #28

grate job Hillary stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #35

Yawn . . . Gamecock Lefty Oct 2015 #38

Yawn, another pointless response... dorkzilla Oct 2015 #43

Despite your wishful thinking, the Primary is NOT over yet 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #49

What could Pritzker and these billionaires want? Or are they just benevolent fans? EndElectoral Oct 2015 #42

Oh they TOTES don�t expect quid pro quo! Hillary wouldn�t do that! dorkzilla Oct 2015 #45

I've seen them post here that they don't believe Hillary would have a quid pro quo. Scuba Oct 2015 #48

If their lips are moving, they are lying. hifiguy Oct 2015 #104

Well, some of them do talk as if they just fell off a turnip truck Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #117

Corporatist or for-the-people davemac Oct 2015 #54

i would think, given the history of the Citizens United case 0rganism Oct 2015 #65

I do not see it ending nicely. PowerToThePeople Oct 2015 #66

K&R! n/t in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #69

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #74

My pleasure Uncle Joe. nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #116

33 states -- anybody know which ones? nt antigop Oct 2015 #77

I was told here yesterday that Hillary isn't getting big donations from Corporate entities??? sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #78

And I'm sure such claims were backed-up with convincing arguments and solid evidence 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #115

Government of the billionaires, by the billionaires hifiguy Oct 2015 #81

These arrangements are open to all candidates. It would be definition of lunacy tritsofme Oct 2015 #109

Besides, she could never get small donor donations in anything like numbers senz Oct 2015 #114