Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I just found this on the AFSCME FaceBook page [View all]Omaha Steve
(109,109 posts)71. Posted by a member or the public
Like any FaceBook page. It will be removed soon I'm sure.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I hope this means that individual AFSCME members will be voting for Bernie and NOT Hillary. eom
a kennedy
Oct 2015
#2
Bernie folks have been posting on this page ever since the endorsement. Anyone can post anything.
upaloopa
Oct 2015
#3
It appears that graphic was posted by two members of AFSCME, not the union itself.
George II
Oct 2015
#54
Anyone can log in as AFSCME, with their email and password, and post on the page?
arcane1
Oct 2015
#28
As Madame Secretary rises in the polls I expect the attacks on her to become increasingly...
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#10
Nobody is disputing the independent senator from Vermont eschews donations from ...
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#18
It seems Madame Secretary is already putting the proverbial "fear of God" in the pharmaceutical
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#25
I hope they were wearing Depends because Madame Secretary likely made them wet themselves...
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#48
Yes she is a tough cookie like Madam Thatcher. Too bad she won't be fighting for the 99%.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#81
I doubt she will tax the billionaires. I doubt she will do anything to control the banks or Wall
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#86
"What people say and what they do are two different things." To the conservative mind
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#102
I already explained it. My remarks require no further elucidation./nt
DemocratSinceBirth
Oct 2015
#98
Spin it as you might, the fact is that HRC is accepting campaign money from
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#78
If you're referring to the OP, technically it is "correct info", but it's incomplete and misleading.
George II
Oct 2015
#59
Of course it's incorrect. Companies aren't legally allowed to donate to candidates
mythology
Oct 2015
#68
It's simple for corporations to get around the requirement that they can't donate to candidates.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#92
People keep saying that but can't seem to come up with any real information to "confirm" that.
George II
Oct 2015
#115
You conveniently left out the separate columns designation contributions from INDIVIDUALS...
George II
Oct 2015
#26
Steve imho it is a mistake to conflate individual donations with corporate donations
emulatorloo
Oct 2015
#31
Too bad it's false. Clinton didn't accept a PENNY from "various pharmaceutical Co.'s", or any...
George II
Oct 2015
#24
Read the details - corporations and unions are forbidden from contributing to candidates...
George II
Oct 2015
#51
I think Hillary has more power over them that's why they feel the need to contribute. Bernie is no
kelliekat44
Oct 2015
#29
When a candidate needs the money for public exposure and getting out the message, how much
Fred Sanders
Oct 2015
#50