Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Sanders: I Am NOT 'SHOUTING' At Hillary Clinton [View all]Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)78. She wants a mud fight.
She wants to drag any competition into the mud and slug it out. Can't do it on policy so let's get ugly.
No thanks, I'll pass Mrs. Clinton.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Clinton said that she would support a law that would hold gun manufacturers
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#31
Based on your hunches and some conspiracy you've dreamt up, you find me hypocritical.... ok... nt
boston bean
Oct 2015
#39
I'm not saying you are hypocritical, and where is there a conspiracy? nt edited spelling
Snotcicles
Oct 2015
#40
I am guessing that means there is not such thing. You are trying to hold Sen Sanders
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#91
You bring up Hill's lame DOMA excuse to defend her gender-baiting with a half a quote?
Blue State Bandit
Oct 2015
#100
Yup. That gender card has been played early and often, and, as a woman, all I can say is that this
djean111
Oct 2015
#5
Let me see if I can guess your point. Because you believe that no feminist uses the term "gender
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#32
feminists don't usually use sexist/misognyistic perjoratives against themselves or other women.
boston bean
Oct 2015
#35
But maybe not all feminists agree that "gender card" is a "sexist/misognyistic perjorative".
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#61
It's not true that "only right wingers use that language." That appears to be an
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#119
s/he is not describing the situation correctly anyway. It's the PLAYING of the card that's important
cui bono
Oct 2015
#122
No. That is just plain wrong an backwards. No femininst would ever ACTUALLY PLAY the gender card.
cui bono
Oct 2015
#121
I am with you. Trying to change the focus to an argument over the term "gender card" is a
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#76
Not true at all. Why would calling someone out for playing the card be a right winger thing to say?
cui bono
Oct 2015
#124
what you said. ...we all gotta go with our conscience. and i was for dennis too! :) nt
restorefreedom
Oct 2015
#111
I'm glad Bernie set the record straight. Some people have no respect for the truth.
Enthusiast
Oct 2015
#6
I agree. I heard how he presented it in the context that it was presented. She is twisting.
glinda
Oct 2015
#44
The point is to get people discussing whether or not Sanders is sexist, make him deny it.
TwilightGardener
Oct 2015
#34
OTOH, people who see it as bogus will likely distrust anything that comes out of the mouths
winter is coming
Oct 2015
#48
Concerning the tactic--it serves to intimidate Bernie, and by example O'Malley,
TwilightGardener
Oct 2015
#53
Thing is, as a democratic socialist, Bernie's already been called everything but late for supper.
winter is coming
Oct 2015
#66
Yes. Just plant the seed, put it out there. It doesn't have to have merit.
TwilightGardener
Oct 2015
#98
I agree, Bernie is not 'shouting at anyone'. This is just his style of speaking, he has always
Sunlei
Oct 2015
#38
Please provide a citation for that quote, or else admit that you're making shit up.
Orrex
Oct 2015
#105
"I think what the secretary is doing there is taking words and misapplying them,"
Armstead
Oct 2015
#109