Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
20. Everything youve described took DECADES ti implement.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 03:18 PM
Oct 2015

In the case of women's suffrage and emancipation, nearly a century each.

Things do not happen overnight in politics. Expecting Sanders to waltz into the White House and magically implement single payer is the height of political naivete.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ditto for Sanders. brooklynite Oct 2015 #1
He at least will try RobertEarl Oct 2015 #4
No, he won't even try. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #27
Well then, I guess it doesnlt matter who is preident. meybe we should just turn over the keys... Armstead Oct 2015 #41
It does, they have to be for it treestar Oct 2015 #81
Exactly that. Hillary and her supporters are only about sure things Scootaloo Oct 2015 #9
They are chickens RobertEarl Oct 2015 #12
A Turd Wayer would settle for an initial offer of one slice hifiguy Oct 2015 #46
Just asking does not get you anywhere treestar Oct 2015 #83
What I learned in law school and clerking for two very smart judges hifiguy Oct 2015 #84
So what does "trying" consist of? treestar Oct 2015 #80
We elect leaders that are willing to fight for it. You know like Canada, England, Germany, France think Oct 2015 #5
If Sanders attempted to fight for single payer with a GOP house, he's an even bigger FOOL MohRokTah Oct 2015 #10
You still envision a GOP house. That may be. but if your vision already includes such things then of think Oct 2015 #13
A GOP controlled House is guaranteed, regardless. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #16
That poster doesn't know what they want artislife Oct 2015 #39
I envision a Republican House because every Democratic candidate says there'll be one... brooklynite Oct 2015 #59
He already did RobertEarl Oct 2015 #15
The politically naive astound me. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #17
You astound yourself? RobertEarl Oct 2015 #24
Are you repeating something that was said to you? nt artislife Oct 2015 #40
Parliamentary systems treestar Oct 2015 #66
There will always be plenty of excuses as to why America CAN'T do it. think Oct 2015 #70
You have not, however, addressed the difference between our system treestar Oct 2015 #76
So what if they have a different system. Does that mean we should just settle for think Oct 2015 #77
Who is arguing that? No one. treestar Oct 2015 #78
So you're saying that it's better to not to try changing things.... daleanime Oct 2015 #28
Vermont. Couldn't. Pass. It. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #2
They did pass it. LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #6
Once again JV is wrong RobertEarl Oct 2015 #25
Bernie isn't the Governor of Vermont pinebox Oct 2015 #8
Oh they know it. Krytan11c Oct 2015 #19
I don't ignore it at all. LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #34
They keep telling us lots of nonsense. It's azmom Oct 2015 #3
Indeed. They keep telling me what CAN'T be done. That's not the kind of leadership I want... think Oct 2015 #11
The same was said about emancipation, women's suffrage, the 40hour work week, and scores of other Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #14
Everything youve described took DECADES ti implement. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #20
No kidding. So, do we vote for someone who will promote it or someone who will settle for less? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #21
Obviously, we settle for moving the ACA towards single payer. Baby steps. That's how this works. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #23
When I was in the military I didn't notice the MPs doing much of anything Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #30
I love that Thomas Paine quote Armstead Oct 2015 #42
You should let Hillary know what she was promoting. enlightenment Oct 2015 #32
After reading that, I'm sure confused Armstead Oct 2015 #43
No, I don't most likely because of such thing was in her proposal. Not in this dimension. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #71
How many people have to die hifiguy Oct 2015 #85
That makes no difference whatsoever. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #86
I hope you can live with yourself. hifiguy Oct 2015 #87
That's just too bad. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #88
Whatever. hifiguy Oct 2015 #89
TRYING is INEXCUSABLE!! MohRokTah Oct 2015 #90
Bye now. hifiguy Oct 2015 #91
Wasted time on issues that cannot be advanced... MohRokTah Oct 2015 #92
Looks like they'll kick back and settle. They'll let Bernie do all the heavy lifting and then think Oct 2015 #29
Yep. The Go Along to Get Along wing of the party usually tells us it can't be done. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #31
Bernie has never sponsored "heavy lifting" policy Sheepshank Oct 2015 #33
A politician can do both but treestar Oct 2015 #68
The British nhs was implemented in two years. Medicare took less than that. Doctor_J Oct 2015 #44
This is not the UK. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #53
It depends on the situation sadoldgirl Oct 2015 #18
I support them BOTH, & I'll tell you-The RW doesn't want Americans to have single payer Sunlei Oct 2015 #22
And neither does Mrs Clinton Doctor_J Oct 2015 #38
Some of them will take credit for it if it ever does come to pass. stillwaiting Oct 2015 #26
yeah like Vermont has. you know Vermont where Bernie's been a politicians for decades lol nt msongs Oct 2015 #35
Laughing at America's inability to ensure healthcare coverage is Hilarious! think Oct 2015 #36
Just FYI, Sen. Sanders is a US legislator, not a Vermont State legislator. Zorra Oct 2015 #47
why doesn't hill2016 Oct 2015 #48
he serves at a FEDERAL LEVEL restorefreedom Oct 2015 #54
does he have any influence over hill2016 Oct 2015 #57
he is free to share his opinion restorefreedom Oct 2015 #62
so why didn't he hill2016 Oct 2015 #64
why couldn't hillary convince the country restorefreedom Oct 2015 #75
I guess like Hillary Clinton is responsible for stop and frisk and we have Rand Paul TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #72
they're the same ones who said heritage care was a "great first step toward single payer" Doctor_J Oct 2015 #37
I don't understand. Obama supporters fought tooth and nail for ACA, but they are okay with liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #45
Of course, single payer is a good end goal. BlueCheese Oct 2015 #49
I didn't hear this argument with the ACA and the Republicans have tried to kill it liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #50
We had a unique opportunity in 2009-2010. BlueCheese Oct 2015 #52
I don't have a crystal ball. I can't tell you what year Medicare for all will be passed. You may be liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #55
You want single payer? MrWendel Oct 2015 #51
Single Payer must be initiated on the House. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #56
Naysaying is so yesterday. We'll never have it if no one fights for it. I'm thankful think Oct 2015 #58
The coattails argument has no basis in current political reality. Agnosticsherbet Oct 2015 #63
HC was THE issue back in 2007 but the insurance and pharma companies were handed ... slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #60
You think Speaker Ryan would allow it to come to the floor???????????? Historic NY Oct 2015 #61
Not until you can get a Congress that will pass it treestar Oct 2015 #65
if we do away with our democratic system and elect a king/queen La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2015 #67
If you don't fight for it and don't promote it of course it will NEVER happen. think Oct 2015 #69
It's not happening unless we can turn congress around with supermajorities Renew Deal Oct 2015 #73
It will never happen if no one is willing to take the lead and fight for it. Hillary so far shows no think Oct 2015 #74
WE have to elect the Congress. treestar Oct 2015 #79
Telling us what we "can't" do usually comes from Republicans. Vinca Oct 2015 #82
Trouble is, I want single payer NOW. PatrickforO Oct 2015 #93
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary supporters keep t...»Reply #20