Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
135. Yes....very much fits our times.
Mon Oct 26, 2015, 03:36 PM
Oct 2015

I often think of Simon and Garfunkle's "Sounds of Silence" for these times...and there are so many more from the late 60's through the 70's in that other time of great stress, war and division in our country.


Sounds Of Silence Lyrics
http://www.metrolyrics.com/sounds-of-silence-lyrics-simon-and-garfunkel.html

Hello darkness, my old friend
I've come to talk with you again
Because a vision softly creeping
Left its seeds while I was sleeping
And the vision that was planted
In my brain still remains
Within the sound of silence

In restless dreams I walked alone
Narrow streets of cobblestone
'Neath the halo of a street lamp
I turned my collar to the cold and damp
When my eyes were stabbed by the flash of
A neon light that split the night
And touched the sound of silence

And in the naked light I saw
Ten thousand people, maybe more
People talking without speaking
People hearing without listening
People writing songs that voices never share and no one dared
Disturb the sound of silence

Fools said I, you do not know
Silence like a cancer grows
Hear my words that I might teach you
Take my arms that I might reach you
But my words like silent raindrops fell
And echoed in the wells of silence

And the people bowed and prayed
To the neon God they made
And the sign flashed out its warning
In the words that it was forming
And the signs said, 'The words of the prophets
Are written on the subway walls and tenement halls'
And whispered in the sound of silence

Songwriters
SIMON, PAUL


ooops olddots Oct 2015 #1
Quid Pro Quo Unknown Beatle Oct 2015 #2
^^^ This ^^^ - A View Of War To Come? cantbeserious Oct 2015 #26
Not good. Can you see Bernie doing this? InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2015 #37
Bernie establishing a world-wide highly respected charity? I probably could! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #62
Selling guns in the Middle East is now a charity? bvar22 Oct 2015 #97
Clinton Foundation was selling guns? randys1 Oct 2015 #102
First pay my foundation. Then you can buy guns. senz Oct 2015 #104
I wonder what President Cruz will do in the ME. randys1 Oct 2015 #106
I wonder what President Sanders would do. senz Oct 2015 #108
Exhausting randys1 Oct 2015 #109
Wouldn't be if you backed the right candidate. senz Oct 2015 #112
Surprised we haven't heard more about this. senz Oct 2015 #3
Lessig's concern helps defend against the source attackers dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #22
sirota enid602 Oct 2015 #134
Oh Please....read the article KoKo Oct 2015 #143
Those were the days my friend Fumesucker Oct 2015 #4
But only 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #29
True, it was the Iranian hijackers who were the real enemy Fumesucker Oct 2015 #40
Those were the days, my friend....indeed. KoKo Oct 2015 #84
If it was a Bush, DU would be UNANIMOUS in opposition to it. Not one post would be in support. arcane1 Oct 2015 #94
Werent all these Republican attacks debunked moobu2 Oct 2015 #5
You're really going to call David Sirota a Republican? Scootaloo Oct 2015 #17
No. They were dismissed not debunked. think Oct 2015 #33
Jesus. AzDar Oct 2015 #6
wow. this is bidness as usual. no wonder they get along with the bushes roguevalley Oct 2015 #7
Another OP dredging out the old, debunked "Clinton Cash" talking points. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #8
Hmm, well, the source looks pretty reliable ... senz Oct 2015 #10
The New York Times published Clinton Cash excerpts back in May. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #14
Yes. And of course the same reliable readers fall reliably for the same unreliable propaganda. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #70
This has nothing to do with "Clinton Cash." senz Oct 2015 #110
It's the same bullshit. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #114
It's factual, shocking, and new to me. senz Oct 2015 #119
Claiming it was quid pro quo is not factual. It is just someone's opinion. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #122
Blatant correlations should not be ignored senz Oct 2015 #128
"Correlation" does not mean causation. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #132
So we should shut our eyes and look the other way. senz Oct 2015 #137
No, but you should not make shit up. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #139
yeah, keep telling yourself that fable...nt grasswire Oct 2015 #111
From GOP propaganda coffers directly to the OP sections of DU....there is an obvious co-relation. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #59
None of this money was going to benefit the Clintons personally. The foundation is for charity. pnwmom Oct 2015 #9
Unfortunately, the article contradicts this. senz Oct 2015 #12
Again, Presidents have always promoted the US air industry, which is a major producer pnwmom Oct 2015 #15
Governments & corporations gave money directly to the Clinton FAMILY. senz Oct 2015 #88
All I saw in the article is that they paid the former President for speeches. pnwmom Oct 2015 #93
Speeches? This isn't about "speeches." Try weapons sales to terrorists for cash. senz Oct 2015 #116
There's nothing in this article that says that. n/t pnwmom Oct 2015 #121
There's a disturbing correlation senz Oct 2015 #126
Actually, I think it IS a big deal Scootaloo Oct 2015 #16
Yes. Promoting US interests is part of what the State Department does, and Boeing provides pnwmom Oct 2015 #18
Helping to escalate the global arms race is good, because it save jobs here??? Wow are we lost. reformist2 Oct 2015 #21
Yes some of us appear to be /nt dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #23
Ask 162,000 Boeing employees .... PosterChild Oct 2015 #25
Hillary is anti gun didn't you know? JRLeft Oct 2015 #47
+1000 lol lol lol senz Oct 2015 #120
Providing facts about Hillary is called bashing her. JRLeft Oct 2015 #142
Orwell was an optimist. grasswire Oct 2015 #113
Orwell was prescient senz Oct 2015 #123
Selling billions worth of weapons to a country that beheads more people than ISIS. arcane1 Oct 2015 #95
it's not like the wife of one of her biggest donors in 2008 and now is on the BoD of Clinton Fd. azurnoir Oct 2015 #24
Saudi Arabia getting US weapons requires bribery??? come on... That Guy 888 Oct 2015 #11
Well, they don't state that it's bribery, per se. Although appearances aren't too good. senz Oct 2015 #13
The "real world" runs on grease. The Saudis were just greasing the skids. mhatrw Oct 2015 #146
Clinton supporters will say it was just business as usual, nothing to see here. Bernblu Oct 2015 #19
I often forget that the Secretary of State approves all these arms deals. She's deep in all that. reformist2 Oct 2015 #20
Let me get this straight zalinda Oct 2015 #30
They are republican lite. JRLeft Oct 2015 #46
+1000 senz Oct 2015 #89
Whoooo caaaarrreeesss??? 6chars Oct 2015 #27
Why should we care that she is corrupt? /nt RiverLover Oct 2015 #28
We should sacrifice anything to make her the next president. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #31
WINNING RiverLover Oct 2015 #39
Yes, why? We LOVE corruption! Corruption is GOOD. senz Oct 2015 #90
Already debunked. leftofcool Oct 2015 #32
Dismissed yes. Debunked no. The facts are what they are. think Oct 2015 #34
Yea, those GOP "facts" come up a lot on DU leftofcool Oct 2015 #48
GOP facts. What are those? Facts that don't fit your narrative? think Oct 2015 #50
David Sirota is GOP? Wow. When did he switch? senz Oct 2015 #92
LINK? grasswire Oct 2015 #117
REDUX DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #35
Are you claiming the article contains factual inaccuracies or just that you disagree that facts think Oct 2015 #36
If you believe Hillary Clinton has violated the law I will extend to you the courtesy ... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #38
Activities can occur without violating the letter of the law that still are questionable at best. think Oct 2015 #41
If you believe there was a quid pro quo then you have established one of the elements neccessary DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #42
Did you even read what I wrote? good grief.... think Oct 2015 #44
I gave you the statute and the contact information for the A G. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #45
I wrote right in the title that letter of the law wasn't violated but keep ignoring the damn subject think Oct 2015 #49
If I am guilty of anything it's trying to be helpful./nt DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #51
No. You're trying to avoid discussing what actually happened. So be it... think Oct 2015 #52
I sincerely regret you feel that way. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #53
Did SoS Clinton increase sales of military weaponry after donations were made or not? think Oct 2015 #54
If you believe you have satisfied the elements of bribery I gave you the Statute and A G info. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #57
Thanks for not answering the simple question and then making a baseless claim once again.... think Oct 2015 #63
If she didn't violate any laws what is the point of our tete a tete? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #68
It's a question of character which is the subject here. Do you approve of the selling of weapons think Oct 2015 #77
If it's question of character as a small (d) Democrat I will let my fellow Democrats hash it out... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #79
So you prefer not to give your opinion correct? That is understandable given the circumstances.... think Oct 2015 #80
My opinion is she did nothing wrong. You hold a different opinion. That's how we roll in America. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #81
Thank you for stating your opinion. /nt think Oct 2015 #82
You are welcome, sir or madame, and I would be remiss if I didn't wish you a happy week./nt DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #83
I hope you have a great week also. For what it's worth Hillary did extremely well in the hearing. think Oct 2015 #85
Thank you for this exchange. senz Oct 2015 #98
Bribery and corruption has been legalized. Garrett78 Oct 2015 #129
Is inevitibility your argument for everything? It seems so. Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #56
My support is a function of the fact... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #60
That was not an answer to the question I posed. I didn't ask you why you supported Clinton. Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #71
My initial post in this thread... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #75
Wow... Hepburn Oct 2015 #87
According to her supporters she's not beholden. JRLeft Oct 2015 #43
One obfuscates. The other spins. They all deny. senz Oct 2015 #101
I am convinced far too many Bernie fans know too little about statistics and co-relations Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #55
Do you want to actually discuss what occurred or just drop accusations? think Oct 2015 #58
There is no subject to discuss...that was my point, as others have tried to tell you! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #61
Did you read the article? think Oct 2015 #64
I read Clinton Cash excerpts.. the GOP propaganda rag that alleges the same nothing...did you? Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #67
I read THIS article. This is what is being discussed. I have no clue what you are referencing think Oct 2015 #69
You have no clue!? Google it! Get informed! Then you will understand. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #72
This article is not your right wing source so either discuss facts in THIS article or keep spinning think Oct 2015 #78
The intention is to distract from facts, and discredit their source. arcane1 Oct 2015 #96
This isn't "Clinton Cash." senz Oct 2015 #99
Consider it counter-spin....just keeping things in balance for the thinking folks at DU. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #100
Facts and deflection are two different things, Fred. senz Oct 2015 #103
Correlation <> causation, but in this case, it does equal a GLARINGLY HUGE conflict of interest! nt mhatrw Oct 2015 #148
K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #65
Ugh. A punch to the gut. Bernie should head-on spotlight conflict of interest "realities" as a core JudyM Oct 2015 #66
There are other conflicts of interest like Walton family members and Walmart foundation donations.nt Snotcicles Oct 2015 #91
How truly awful. The hits just keep on comin'. nt Zorra Oct 2015 #73
This is the issue to me expecially with regards to the server. mmonk Oct 2015 #74
+! The "Howdy Gowdy Show" was just a distraction from the real issue.... KoKo Oct 2015 #86
And that is the Big Picture, simply put. senz Oct 2015 #107
Yes....very much fits our times. KoKo Oct 2015 #135
Thanks, KoKo. senz Oct 2015 #138
The Howdy Gowdy Show. Octafish Oct 2015 #115
Yep....The Clinton Foundation is a Conflict of Interest KoKo Oct 2015 #130
Money. Money. Money. Octafish Oct 2015 #140
Terry McAuliffe..Al Gore & "Stolen Election 2000"....and Who Profited? It Goes On... KoKo Oct 2015 #141
wow grasswire Oct 2015 #151
K N R Faux pas Oct 2015 #76
Seems Legit portlander23 Oct 2015 #105
Wonderful, portlander. senz Oct 2015 #127
Okay, so we're basically accusing Clinton taking bribes now. On a Democratic forum? BlueCheese Oct 2015 #118
Desperate times call for desperate measures, I guess. SunSeeker Oct 2015 #124
lol -- uh huh that's got to be it. senz Oct 2015 #131
LOL indeed. Spend your evenings catching up on 5 months worth of the International Business Times? SunSeeker Oct 2015 #133
Wow! Duppers Oct 2015 #125
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #136
Yes...legs....down the road. KoKo Oct 2015 #144
Foundation = found money nt mhatrw Oct 2015 #145
She also forced countries to frack jfern Oct 2015 #147
what countries were forced to frack, do you remember? grasswire Oct 2015 #149
Well, maybe not force, but she did push jfern Oct 2015 #150
thanks much. nt grasswire Oct 2015 #152
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sirota: Clinton Foundatio...»Reply #135