Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Unskewing Monmouth's Iowa Poll [View all] magical thyme Oct 2015 OP
I predicted LONG AGO that the "unskewing of polls" by Sanders supporters would begin at some point MohRokTah Oct 2015 #1
This is pretty obvious. HerbChestnut Oct 2015 #17
Keep telling yourself that MohRokTah Oct 2015 #22
I created another thread that posts a link to the poll internals. HerbChestnut Oct 2015 #30
Sounds representative of standard Iowa Caucus goers MohRokTah Oct 2015 #37
Old people the ones more likely to vote... Historic NY Oct 2015 #47
I remember the howls in 2008 Capt. Obvious Oct 2015 #52
Have chairs been introduced to Iowa yet? Plucketeer Oct 2015 #94
Why do you try so hard to be offensive? Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #67
I think he really doesn't want Hillary to win. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #78
Why would I waste the time MohRokTah Oct 2015 #105
We don't have to. Hillary's own campaign is now saying the poll is rdiculous and actually sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #141
Trump is also now complaing about the scientific polls now that he is a loser! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #24
The last resort of a defeated campaign. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #29
This poll isn't from a corporate entity ten times the size of CNN. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #38
I see light at the end of the tunnel...finally workinclasszero Oct 2015 #58
Trump and Bernie have something in common now! workinclasszero Oct 2015 #34
Nate Cohn is a Sanders supporter? Fawke Em Oct 2015 #71
Lol! bravenak Oct 2015 #80
It was kind of entertaining. ToxMarz Oct 2015 #95
Hillary pays $300,000 a month on polling. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #117
That's smart presidential politics MohRokTah Oct 2015 #118
I call it "Trying to buy a fricken clue." Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2015 #119
Great numbers for Hillary. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #2
It is an outlier kenfrequed Oct 2015 #25
76% of the respondents were over the age of 50 kenfrequed Oct 2015 #3
What percent of Iowa caucus goers are over the age of 50 generally? oberliner Oct 2015 #90
Probably kenfrequed Oct 2015 #100
I agree that the lead is probably not that big oberliner Oct 2015 #101
Kicking the unskewing MohRokTah Oct 2015 #4
Unskew those polls Bernie fans! workinclasszero Oct 2015 #5
Monmouth and Murray are rated A- by FiveThirtyEight BeyondGeography Oct 2015 #6
Look at their methodology! stillwaiting Oct 2015 #15
The methodology is sound based on past voting patterns....are those going to change? Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #28
we shall see when people actually vote virtualobserver Oct 2015 #54
And this is what's going to make watching y'all get blindsided all the sweeter.. frylock Oct 2015 #77
I welome the outcome with open arms Elmer S. E. Dump Oct 2015 #130
But they're not. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #81
Exactly! kenfrequed Oct 2015 #103
Has it occured to you that "the population that is OVERWHELMINGLY supporting Bernie" isn't in Iowa? brooklynite Oct 2015 #41
Yeah the portion of the population that never shows up at the voting booth! workinclasszero Oct 2015 #62
Other than in 2008.. frylock Oct 2015 #79
Yup BHO I voted for him twice workinclasszero Oct 2015 #84
Yeah, me too. A lot of the people being outright dismissed as unreliable also voted for Obama.. frylock Oct 2015 #91
Ok workinclasszero Oct 2015 #92
The polls weighted to mostly Boomers? frylock Oct 2015 #97
Right, the people that actually get off the internet workinclasszero Oct 2015 #99
And now we've come full circle.. frylock Oct 2015 #102
I'm not worried about people that will sit home against their best interests workinclasszero Oct 2015 #104
They're also the population that caused Obama to win both times. jeff47 Oct 2015 #121
Yeah, just look at it! Facebook and Twitter are much more scientific. NYC Liberal Oct 2015 #70
Wow! workinclasszero Oct 2015 #18
Monmouth and Murray are rated A- by FiveThirtyEight workinclasszero Oct 2015 #60
Truth the polls! Dr Hobbitstein Oct 2015 #7
Looks like there is a misunderstanding of how the sample was selected Godhumor Oct 2015 #8
That in itself is a skewing issue. blackspade Oct 2015 #109
Kicking the unskewing again because I forgot to rec the thread MohRokTah Oct 2015 #9
Dude, you okay? merrily Oct 2015 #14
This is pretty much an admission of defeat. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #20
You okay, though? merrily Oct 2015 #26
I won't die laughing. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #32
I'll save you!!!! bravenak Oct 2015 #86
Pretty sure they are better than ok. nt. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #35
Doesn't look that way Gore1FL Oct 2015 #68
I would say there isn't enough there to draw conclusion from as you have. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #76
I suppose the poster could just like to spam, too. Gore1FL Oct 2015 #82
I simply see that as more assumptions based of smilies. NCTraveler Oct 2015 #87
The context shows otherwise. Gore1FL Oct 2015 #113
Jury results zappaman Oct 2015 #42
Must have been one of my alert stalkers. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #45
That's a weird alert. Gore1FL Oct 2015 #73
Explanation: Alerter really had to struggle to come up with a reason for alerting and has failed Cha Oct 2015 #138
Sometimes it's easy. zappaman Oct 2015 #139
Yeah, and itchy fingers gets a 24 hr time out. OH WELL! Cha Oct 2015 #140
You can't make a freakin' move without those itchy alert fingers tracking you down. Lots of fun Cha Oct 2015 #137
Many (most?) polls are designed to influence opinion, not measure it. Scuba Oct 2015 #10
This far out, that is definitely so. merrily Oct 2015 #13
. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #16
The corporate oligarchs love guys like you. Scuba Oct 2015 #19
. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #23
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service Capt. Obvious Oct 2015 #50
You need to come up with names treestar Oct 2015 #96
Here's a starter kit ... Scuba Oct 2015 #115
I wonder why Sanders (finally) hired one pollster of his own? merrily Oct 2015 #11
My God. It's just blatant and in your face isn't it? stillwaiting Oct 2015 #12
LOL....let's take trip down memory lane, shall we? Cali_Democrat Oct 2015 #21
IT's a blatant admission of defeat when they start unskewing the polls MohRokTah Oct 2015 #27
Hmmmmm BooScout Oct 2015 #31
Yep... kicking our asses to the poor house. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #112
Unskewiing polls worked so well for Romney and Karl Rove Gothmog Oct 2015 #33
With enough money, you can buy almost anything. People, polls, facebook likes, Zorra Oct 2015 #36
Or even Howard Deans pollester. Historic NY Oct 2015 #44
Dayum, my Skidmore Oct 2015 #63
Believe it or not, there really are people who pay for hundreds of thousands of Facebook likes Zorra Oct 2015 #69
That may be true. Skidmore Oct 2015 #83
I did not state, or imply, that "every person Zorra Oct 2015 #114
So the oligarchs have been buying the polls for decades now treestar Oct 2015 #98
More post-debate numbers from Iowa: Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #39
I suspect that this poll is an outlier... OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #40
I gave the methodology it's own thread magical thyme Oct 2015 #48
Profile of the Caucusgoers brooklynite Oct 2015 #43
very skewed toward older people, 75% landlines, 100% prior caucus-goers magical thyme Oct 2015 #46
Despite the record turnout in 2008... OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #53
exactly!! prior caucus participation may miss larger trends of newly motivated voters zazen Oct 2015 #72
Yes, in 2008 the Dem Party in my state had a caucus rather than a primary. tblue37 Oct 2015 #133
Hi MT, are you contesting the NYT data about Iowa caucus goers as well? emulatorloo Oct 2015 #55
That was always the Howard Dean plan...didn't work out quite that way brooklynite Oct 2015 #75
It was also the Obama plan. It worked out just fine for him (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #122
When I opened this, I thought it was going to be satire. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #49
Yup we made it here... Agschmid Oct 2015 #51
Not as prideless as the time DU went all 19th century on the Ebola propaganda, but close. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #57
I hope no one is surprized at this. William769 Oct 2015 #56
I predicted it weeks ago MohRokTah Oct 2015 #59
Agreed. William769 Oct 2015 #61
And you were right workinclasszero Oct 2015 #64
LOL, Sanders fans are now unskewing polls? Was only a matter of time! NYC Liberal Oct 2015 #65
This forum is an absolute shambles today. Even worse than usual Number23 Oct 2015 #131
Look at the demographics of the electorate, especially in Iowa. They're right on! George II Oct 2015 #66
It's more of an outlier than anything else. Gore1FL Oct 2015 #74
"If you believe this poll I have a bridge to sell you." Tarc Oct 2015 #85
Hanging on to hope by it's tail upaloopa Oct 2015 #88
A second poll has confirmed the results of this poll. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #110
ROFL.. comedy at its best. Amimnoch Oct 2015 #89
Skewed Oligarchy!!! Gamecock Lefty Oct 2015 #93
I knew something smelled about this "poll"... SoapBox Oct 2015 #106
I'm laughing so hard at the Hillary supporters retrowire Oct 2015 #107
.... LexVegas Oct 2015 #108
. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #111
The results mirror the Loras Poll DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #120
It has basically the same voter screen. jeff47 Oct 2015 #123
You should start a facebook page where you and those similarly concerned can lodge your complaints DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #124
Why? We don't form our deeply-held beliefs based on the results of polls. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #125
Then there isn't a problem. Sometimes a poll is just a poll./nt DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #126
And yet that does not make it impossible to discuss their voter screen. (nt) jeff47 Oct 2015 #127
Loras College released a new Iowa poll a short time ago: George II Oct 2015 #116
And like the Monmouth poll, it excluded younger and new voters who are not yet registered magical thyme Oct 2015 #128
Neither "excluded" younger and new voters - both used a sampling that reflects the demographics... George II Oct 2015 #129
Regardless of how one feels DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #132
Excellent analysis, thank you. Apparently even her own campaign doesn't believe that poll. sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #134
Funny how polls that show BS gaining on HRC ... NanceGreggs Oct 2015 #135
The leveling of support has been occuring for some time now. Dem2 Oct 2015 #136
Dewey Defeats Truman! n/t Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #142
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Unskewing Monmouth's Iowa...»Reply #6