Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Seriously, Secretary Clinton? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)17. True, we saw that in the last campaign in 2008. Same old negative campaigning, same old
personal attacks instead of any discussion of issues from her supporters. I remember it well. It didn't work for her last time, so why they are doing it again, is beyond me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's interesting that you say that. It reminded me of Hillary's statements on legislation she
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#4
Yes, to everything you said. She seems forced when she talks. Maybe it's just a mannerism, but
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#20
I think it's a viewpoint meant to be used to teach people to take control of their lives
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#37
That hasn't been my experience, being a woman has never stopped me from doing anything I
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#70
"victimhood" as a concept is only as useful as how well it provides answers
redruddyred
Nov 2015
#170
Did you read the OP? I did state that they had met. Every Western Leader has met with Aung
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#8
Gotta tack onto that resume and 'list of achievements' at every opportunity. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#38
In the inner circles of DC war criminals like Kissenger and Rove and Cheney are sought after
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#79
It doesnt take much strength to deal with those nitwits. I know teenagers who could wipe the floor
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#9
Since when do YOU speak for the American people? Lol, you seem a bit upset. I know it's
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#14
No, you're the one who goes to another site and calls DU members "dense as a brick ...
Scuba
Oct 2015
#43
I have great respect for sabrina, both her character and her wordsmithing. You're also good ...
Scuba
Oct 2015
#84
That's exactly the point. Caring about the American people. I can't believe the objections here to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#146
I also saw polls senz. On the issues of the most importance to the American people. I am certain
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#131
Surely you have heard of POLLS??? The Amercan people speak for themselves in POLLS
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#99
She speaks with the 99%, who do you speak with? HRC clearly speaks for Goldman-Sachs and
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#109
You may be a part of the 99% but apparently you favor the 1%. I understand, they are tough and
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#116
You choose which side of this class war to be on and it's not the side of the 99%.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#122
How sad that you are of the 99% and yet you choose to support the 1% instead of the 50 million
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#117
I notice that you always ask questions but never tell us what your stand is. Are you afraid to
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#123
I am still waiting for you to actually address issues like fracking. You know where the peoples of
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#134
You object to people caring about the American People? That IS what politics is supposed to be all
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#143
You've been objecting throughout this thread to me referencing the concerns of the American people
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#145
When President Obama begged and pleaded with the American people to take on
truedelphi
Oct 2015
#129
I dont need help, haven't you noticed, I'm not the kind of woman who cries 'poor me, I'm a woman'
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#72
I'm sorry, but for me, politics IS about the American People. It isn't about politicians we 'love'
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#150
She can't win wth just democrats. Dems are now only 32% of the electorate. Bernie already has over
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#155
I answered your questions. Your posts in THIS thread objected to my caring about the American
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#158
We're being denied democracy when the Corp Media deletes its OWN POLLS showing Bernie not just
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#151
What crossover votes is she going to get? Repubs? Bernie is. Independents who have fled both
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#156
I don't know about "The" American People but "many" American People are sick of all these wars and i
Bread and Circus
Oct 2015
#85
P.S. Hillary plays the victim card all the time. And you can't admit that then
Bread and Circus
Oct 2015
#88
cause gee it's not like the Benghazi "issue" hasn't been on going since 2012 or anything
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#30
I've got enough faith in my fellow citizens and enough understanding to know they had NOTHING
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#124
Look you've got nothing so fall back on the weak condescension and faith in "winning"
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#126
I see integrity as being much more important than being tough. I know that authoritarians will
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#108
Any ISSUES you would like to discuss? Like War, Torture, Private Prisons, Welfare Reform? The TPP,
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#16
Women's issues, absolutely. What would you like to discuss re women? I certainly don't appreciate
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#22
Let me see if I can disect your comment and explain to you what you don't seem to understand.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#32
Exactly! It was llmost Rovian. Bernie is so strong on issues such as Women's Rights, it's hard to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#68
Powerful, wealthy women playing the victim, pretending something happened that didn't is a total
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#161
And that's why it was such a ridiculous thing to do. She provided FODDER for the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#27
No one is arguing that she isn't tough. The problem is that tough isn't enough. I am sure she will
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#106
True, we saw that in the last campaign in 2008. Same old negative campaigning, same old
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#17
Who cares? There are all kinds of obstacles that powerful people have to be able to handle.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#28
Bains, congrats on a most excellent post. Amazing how women who stand up for themselves are
seaglass
Oct 2015
#133
Truly strong women do not level a charge of 'sexism' as a political maneuver. Period.
AzDar
Oct 2015
#66