2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: John McCain: Bernie Sanders, NOT Hillary Clinton, Has ‘Record of Advocacy’ For VETS [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)No one is calling Sanders "GOP fodder." No one is saying YOU are a "McCain worshipper." That's an absurd premise from the get-go.
But using McCain to try to "bolster" Sanders is absurd. As I said, it's like using a vegetarian to tout the advantages of the Outback Steak House. They just don't go together. They don't agree on a single social program. They never will, either. Just because a Navy retiree and former POW likes a guy's legislation re: vets doesn't mean he'll like his legislation on a single other subject. That vegetarian I mentioned might like the parking lot at the Outback, but she doesn't care for a single thing on the menu.
This isn't about dim bulbs or flashes of brilliance, either. It's about finding a single point of congruence and trying to make something out of it that's just NOT there. "Oh look--McCain agrees with Bernie on treating veterans with a modicum of decency.....that means Bernie will sell McCain on universal health care NEXT WEEK...just you watch!!! See? SEE? Bernie CAN work with Republicans--they share his views!! Yay!" I'll bet you can find Republicans who agree with Sanders on dairy subsidies, too--that doesn't mean that Sanders has grand powers of pursuasion, it simply means that the Republican has rural constituents, too.
There's not much "there" there on this matter. The OP is framed as though McCain is "endorsing" Sanders, but when you dig down that's not what is happening. Further, the point that is lost on way too many is that framing McCain's comments as an endorsement is unhelpful to Sanders. Who wants a President that meets John McCain's standards? He's the guy who sang "Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" after all.