Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Seriously, Secretary Clinton? [View all]kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)140. Who doesn't speak for you?
You seem to have jumped into this thread somewhere in the middle and made demands that the rest of us aren't privy to. Is this a discussion that the two of you (Rick and Zappa) should be having over email or something?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's interesting that you say that. It reminded me of Hillary's statements on legislation she
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#4
Yes, to everything you said. She seems forced when she talks. Maybe it's just a mannerism, but
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#20
I think it's a viewpoint meant to be used to teach people to take control of their lives
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#37
That hasn't been my experience, being a woman has never stopped me from doing anything I
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#70
"victimhood" as a concept is only as useful as how well it provides answers
redruddyred
Nov 2015
#170
Did you read the OP? I did state that they had met. Every Western Leader has met with Aung
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#8
Gotta tack onto that resume and 'list of achievements' at every opportunity. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Oct 2015
#38
In the inner circles of DC war criminals like Kissenger and Rove and Cheney are sought after
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#79
It doesnt take much strength to deal with those nitwits. I know teenagers who could wipe the floor
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#9
Since when do YOU speak for the American people? Lol, you seem a bit upset. I know it's
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#14
No, you're the one who goes to another site and calls DU members "dense as a brick ...
Scuba
Oct 2015
#43
I have great respect for sabrina, both her character and her wordsmithing. You're also good ...
Scuba
Oct 2015
#84
That's exactly the point. Caring about the American people. I can't believe the objections here to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#146
I also saw polls senz. On the issues of the most importance to the American people. I am certain
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#131
Surely you have heard of POLLS??? The Amercan people speak for themselves in POLLS
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#99
She speaks with the 99%, who do you speak with? HRC clearly speaks for Goldman-Sachs and
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#109
You may be a part of the 99% but apparently you favor the 1%. I understand, they are tough and
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#116
You choose which side of this class war to be on and it's not the side of the 99%.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#122
How sad that you are of the 99% and yet you choose to support the 1% instead of the 50 million
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#117
I notice that you always ask questions but never tell us what your stand is. Are you afraid to
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#123
I am still waiting for you to actually address issues like fracking. You know where the peoples of
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#134
You object to people caring about the American People? That IS what politics is supposed to be all
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#143
You've been objecting throughout this thread to me referencing the concerns of the American people
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#145
When President Obama begged and pleaded with the American people to take on
truedelphi
Oct 2015
#129
I dont need help, haven't you noticed, I'm not the kind of woman who cries 'poor me, I'm a woman'
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#72
I'm sorry, but for me, politics IS about the American People. It isn't about politicians we 'love'
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#150
She can't win wth just democrats. Dems are now only 32% of the electorate. Bernie already has over
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#155
I answered your questions. Your posts in THIS thread objected to my caring about the American
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#158
We're being denied democracy when the Corp Media deletes its OWN POLLS showing Bernie not just
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#151
What crossover votes is she going to get? Repubs? Bernie is. Independents who have fled both
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#156
I don't know about "The" American People but "many" American People are sick of all these wars and i
Bread and Circus
Oct 2015
#85
P.S. Hillary plays the victim card all the time. And you can't admit that then
Bread and Circus
Oct 2015
#88
cause gee it's not like the Benghazi "issue" hasn't been on going since 2012 or anything
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#30
I've got enough faith in my fellow citizens and enough understanding to know they had NOTHING
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#124
Look you've got nothing so fall back on the weak condescension and faith in "winning"
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#126
I see integrity as being much more important than being tough. I know that authoritarians will
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#108
Any ISSUES you would like to discuss? Like War, Torture, Private Prisons, Welfare Reform? The TPP,
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#16
Women's issues, absolutely. What would you like to discuss re women? I certainly don't appreciate
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#22
Let me see if I can disect your comment and explain to you what you don't seem to understand.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#32
Exactly! It was llmost Rovian. Bernie is so strong on issues such as Women's Rights, it's hard to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#68
Powerful, wealthy women playing the victim, pretending something happened that didn't is a total
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#161
And that's why it was such a ridiculous thing to do. She provided FODDER for the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#27
No one is arguing that she isn't tough. The problem is that tough isn't enough. I am sure she will
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#106
True, we saw that in the last campaign in 2008. Same old negative campaigning, same old
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#17
Who cares? There are all kinds of obstacles that powerful people have to be able to handle.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#28
Bains, congrats on a most excellent post. Amazing how women who stand up for themselves are
seaglass
Oct 2015
#133
Truly strong women do not level a charge of 'sexism' as a political maneuver. Period.
AzDar
Oct 2015
#66