Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary's direct quote on Raising the Retirement age: 'I would consider it'! [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)26. Sickening to me. Coming from such a very privileged woman. I guess I would be among those she wants
to penalize and punish because of my work as a teacher?? Why would she want to do that? To teachers and nurses and presumably people in the Service Industry. I really would like to know what she means by that 'I would be willing to consider' penalizing and punishing' people like that? For WHAT?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary's direct quote on Raising the Retirement age: 'I would consider it'! [View all]
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
OP
I will update this when the other OP is updated. I at least posted the full quote.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#3
I will edit that. But to be frank, I was under the impression that details don't matter much on DU
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#18
No, it's not actually. I know that for a fact. But I see no point in maintaining an ethical
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#34
Well we will have to agree to disagree on who is disrupting this site. I am working hard for Bernie
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#98
I'd like to know where those other Bernie-loving places are, if you would, please PM....
Utopian Leftist
Oct 2015
#115
Unfortunately she went on to say how, if someone could present her with a way to
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#100
A point should be made here. While Sanders supporters continue to discuss issues, HRC supporters
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#32
I have tried maybe a hundred times to engage HRC supporters in honest discussions
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#73
You are living in denial land. HRC supporters never talk to issues but throw ad hominem attacks.
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#86
Yep. All I hear from "them" is that she has great poll numbers, and that she "deserves it."
reformist2
Oct 2015
#103
Misleading headline, you forgot the word ***NOT *** from the title in the OP
Sheepshank
Oct 2015
#41
The only time Hillary contradicts herself, is when you listen to what she says .
orpupilofnature57
Oct 2015
#2
The OP is essentially a lie. Sanders supporters must be desperate. If you gave a shit
KittyWampus
Oct 2015
#6
Hey, I just did what you did. Took a quote out of context and made it a headline. Then did what you
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#8
Actually, it's your post that's the big lie. Here's your precious "next" paragraph - doesn't change
in_cog_ni_to
Oct 2015
#27
Thank you. I love how people whine when they post out of context quotes and then someone does the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#49
Yes, seriously just playing. This isn't a place to be serious anymore. But it is fun watching the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#63
In lieu of telling us how you feel about HRC's stand on SS, you choose to talk about
rhett o rick
Oct 2015
#47
'swishy' I will add that to the list of words used to attack Democrats who have fought for the
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#9
Yes, that is exactly right. And why I posted THIS OP. Did you go into the OP that inspired this one
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#15
Cherry picking, and out of context heading.....now who in the hell from the left does that?
Sheepshank
Oct 2015
#48
So you object to the other OP that 'cherry picked' a quote, and worse, didn't even include the full
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#54
Then explain to me how you would know that someone you never met has done nothng to preserve SS??
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#16
Everyone is on the defensive around here so I can understand the mistake Sabrina made.
Agschmid
Oct 2015
#40
I'd love to know what "way" she could find that would NOT penalize certain types of
CharlotteVale
Oct 2015
#17
That's THE question, isn't it? Who does she WANT to punish and penalize? And what does that kind
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#21
Sickening to me. Coming from such a very privileged woman. I guess I would be among those she wants
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#26
I don't think she really has puppet masters. She is one of them at least in the PR/political arm
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#64
yes, I'm not sure why "I would consider it" is so hard for the fan club to understand
Doctor_J
Oct 2015
#29
Right, and while you've called her out on it, you refuse to condemn the other thread..
frylock
Oct 2015
#68
Didn't Bush privatize it? He proposed chained CPI in broad daylight, your flippant "response"
TheKentuckian
Oct 2015
#75
Why? And why didn't he dangle some other carrot? Stop the nonsense, he is FOR Chained CPI made
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#99
Obama said he favored that, but it didn't happen when Democrats controlled Congress
PoliticAverse
Oct 2015
#81
Maybe she will. Maybe she won't. And, that's a promise! Either way, it will be a "Hard Choice"
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2015
#70
True. We'll have to wait and see, I suppose. But I'm with the candidate who doesn't seem to have a
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#71
Me too. HRC seems to consider non-choices "hard", CYA kinda, maybe, choices not so "hard".
Tierra_y_Libertad
Oct 2015
#96
A good leader should "consider" everything. Good decisions are made after consideration of
kelliekat44
Oct 2015
#76
Excuse me? We are not talking about people who are criminals here, though I can't blame you for
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#83
She can't speak in a straightforward manner because her pollsters tell her to speak about a given
Bernblu
Oct 2015
#97
And every effort should be made to stop the Republicans and their bosses from raising it anymore.
sabrina 1
Oct 2015
#111