Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Please, no more revisionsist history about Clinton's IWR vote [View all]CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)17. I don't call it revisionist history. I call it lies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Summaries for Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
saturnsring
Nov 2015
#3
In one of his videos, Ben Ladin said he made up his mind to strike us when he saw the
merrily
Nov 2015
#34
Hillary did not simply vote to authorize the invasion, which would have been bad enough.
merrily
Nov 2015
#7
It's amazing the turds some people will try to polish up, after the fact.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2015
#12
There's really no way to apologize for it, either. Unnumbered Iraqis injured, killed,
merrily
Nov 2015
#25
Text of Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
saturnsring
Nov 2015
#13
Hillary wasn't up for election for 4 years, she had no excuse about the immediate election
jfern
Nov 2015
#33
The political climate was completely different in 2002 than it is now or even in 2008.
madinmaryland
Nov 2015
#36
His "malfeasance" was exposed to political junkies, the ones who post on message boards and
merrily
Nov 2015
#28
I'm not having any trouble with selective memory, telling the truth or assessing morality of a bad
merrily
Nov 2015
#39
Um you did the same thing in Reply 35. The difference is I posted some support from my statements.
merrily
Nov 2015
#57
I posted links and info. If posting emotions is possible at all, it's more your area than mine.
merrily
Nov 2015
#62
Now you're just making up stuff about what my prior posts said. Good thing everyone can read them.
merrily
Nov 2015
#65
If IWR was a vote for war, why was IRAQ invaded by Hans Blix and the U.N. Weapons Inspectors
BlueStateLib
Nov 2015
#20
And your point is? Read the AUMF. It counts a hell of a lot more than the ass-covering bloviation
merrily
Nov 2015
#27
That vote, which she cast no doubt thinking of her own political future, lost her the last election.
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#26
The UN weapons inspectors in Iraq at the time were shouting from the rooftops "There are no WMD"
AgingAmerican
Nov 2015
#29
Her vote aligned with the wishes of PNAC, the DLC and its kin, the Progressive Policy Institute.
merrily
Nov 2015
#54
There were no weapons inspectors in Iraq until after IWR and UN Sec Res 1441. That's what those
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#66
The weapons inspectors were thrown out of iraq on the eve of the invasion
AgingAmerican
Nov 2015
#68
That's correct. They were admitted after IWR and UN Sec Res 1441 and were thrown out shortly
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#69
The excuse is Saddam wouldn't have cooperated without a real threat....
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#47
The problem with your thinking is, that is exactly what was talked about at the time.
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#67
Yes, France voted for UN Sec Res 1441 within two weeks of IWR for the same purpose
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#71
That was a talking point of the time that Bush invaded to enforce 1441....
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#73
It was the text of the Resolution and France and Russia had a part in the negotiations about it.
stevenleser
Nov 2015
#74
Her 20 minute speech on the Senate floor proves that she knew that Bush would use it.
Major Hogwash
Nov 2015
#79
The point is she thought it was the right thing to do until it was the wrong thing to do.
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#81
Britain was already bombing radar installations in Northern Iraq in early August of 2002.
Major Hogwash
Nov 2015
#82
Yes Bush was given a blank check with the AUMF, it authorized using military force of which only one
Thinkingabout
Nov 2015
#78
The OP is about the Iraq War Resolution. More than one person voted against it.
Vattel
Nov 2015
#100
This again? It doesn't appear that this is having the effect that Bernie's followers expect.
NurseJackie
Nov 2015
#89
Hillary supporters are turning a blind eye to a critically important issue.
Martin Eden
Nov 2015
#94
Thanks, at least it was fairly civil (even if nothing was accomplished). n/t
Martin Eden
Nov 2015
#107