2016 Postmortem

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)

39. Beating the Republicans at any cost....

Reply to angrychair (Reply #37)

Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:28 PM

Nov 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

77 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Being Honest [View all] angrychair Nov 2015 OP

If she is truly about campaign finance reform this would be done think Nov 2015 #1

You support Bernie right? upaloopa Nov 2015 #2

handicap? angrychair Nov 2015 #5

We should not limit the amount of money upaloopa Nov 2015 #8

Didnt say "limit" angrychair Nov 2015 #16

But it will never happen. artislife Nov 2015 #21

after we win we can "try" to fix how campaigns raise money Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #34

Ironically, she's proving SuperPACs aren't even needed... JaneyVee Nov 2015 #3

But she will need the SuperPACs to combat the gop SuperPACs. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #13

And it's reasonable to know who is behind the SuperPACs Armstead Nov 2015 #31

Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #40

If she's claiming she'll get rid of Super PACs if elected, then surely.. Kentonio Nov 2015 #55

Because it is in the middle of an election where the REAL opposition ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #58

If you support getting rid of Super PACs Kentonio Nov 2015 #61

Just make sure you don't look at her burn rate. (nt) jeff47 Nov 2015 #77

While I think it's unlikely that HRC will really be a strong advocate on campaign finance reform el_bryanto Nov 2015 #4

How? angrychair Nov 2015 #6

I agree that we have a moral right to - but we don't have a legal right to. el_bryanto Nov 2015 #9

That is your answer? angrychair Nov 2015 #19

It sounds as if your problem is with asjr Nov 2015 #27

With the SCTos but they didn't force candidates NOT to disclose Armstead Nov 2015 #32

No, specifically angrychair Nov 2015 #33

This sounds like: It depends what "is" is. artislife Nov 2015 #23

Jeb had all the money in the world and we see where that got him. marym625 Nov 2015 #10

I would agree with that el_bryanto Nov 2015 #11

I can blame Clinton for playing to her strengths. marym625 Nov 2015 #14

The problem is that most people don't take the time to look beyond the surface el_bryanto Nov 2015 #18

I disagree. but even so, it doesn't preclude what the OP requests. n/t marym625 Nov 2015 #29

Except insofar as you belief a complete accounting of who is giving Money to Clinton el_bryanto Nov 2015 #42

I'm so far as it is the right thing to do marym625 Nov 2015 #75

The right wing of DU will not like this idea. PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #7

I'm pretty sure the campaign will not accept your "proposal" ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #12

Standards matter angrychair Nov 2015 #20

It appears that "Standards matter" for only you, and a small sliver of DUers ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #36

So, scorched earth protocol? angrychair Nov 2015 #43

It is you that is holding the torch, in a rather transparent effort ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #53

What am i doing? angrychair Nov 2015 #60

Big of you to finally come out and admit that standards don't matter. frylock Nov 2015 #69

Standard do matter ... So does disingenuousness. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #71

Another breakthrough! frylock Nov 2015 #72

Well ... All this ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #73

To add on angrychair Nov 2015 #30

hey, why not ask her to saw off her own leg? Sheepshank Nov 2015 #15

Same question angrychair Nov 2015 #22

it's what happens to the donors..... Sheepshank Nov 2015 #25

Disagree angrychair Nov 2015 #35

wll of course you disagree. And that is ok n/t Sheepshank Nov 2015 #46

So, you are choosing not to answer? angrychair Nov 2015 #48

Oh, I answered, you just didn't like what I wrote..remember? you said you disagree. Sheepshank Nov 2015 #49

I didn't see your answer. Can you reiterate? frylock Nov 2015 #74

Saw off her own leg to satisfy the "demands" of people that have made it clear ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #38

Is disclosing whoo is suppoting her "sawing her legs off" Armstead Nov 2015 #41

And those in the anti-HRC, i.e., those making these "demands" ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #54

The cynical and apathetic is widespread because of the systemic corruption of the system Armstead Nov 2015 #65

So, am i being dishonest? angrychair Nov 2015 #68

Really angrychair Nov 2015 #45

lol...there is that n/t Sheepshank Nov 2015 #47

She's kinda like the alcoholic who swears he's gettin off the booze..after a few more drinks. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #17

I think she's more like the victor who doesn't take a knife to a gunfight Rose Siding Nov 2015 #56

Considering her foreign policy record she'd be more likely to send the army to the gunfight. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #59

In this analogy, the serial numbers will have been removed from her gun. frylock Nov 2015 #70

+1 aidbo Nov 2015 #76

Good challenge. You can't SAY one thing and do another, sorry! sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #24

"Standards Matter"......winning is an afterthought apparently VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #26

Winning at any cost? angrychair Nov 2015 #37

Beating the Republicans at any cost.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #39

So, scorched earth protocol? angrychair Nov 2015 #44

Sadly This donations to campaigns by corporate America is the Way the Game Is Played Today LeFleur1 Nov 2015 #57

Cant say i agree completely angrychair Nov 2015 #64

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Nov 2015 #28

More like "being silly". NurseJackie Nov 2015 #50

Really angrychair Nov 2015 #52

And that's over-reacting. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #63

I do appreciate feedback angrychair Nov 2015 #66

It'd be a step in the right direction Monassa Nov 2015 #51

would that be hill2016 Nov 2015 #62

No angrychair Nov 2015 #67