2016 Postmortem

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

162. Precisely! It appears that Cosmic Kitten may be referring to an earlier post of mine …

Wed Nov 4, 2015, 06:06 PM

Nov 2015

… in which I responded by telling him or her that if they didn't want to vote for Hillary, and if you prefer to sit-out the election, then so be it … if you feel that strongly about it then don't vote for Hillary.

The obvious gist of the message is that people who make such declarations have already made up their minds, so what good does it do me (or anyone) to try and convince them to do otherwise? They want coddling and validation and I'm not going to participate in that kind of game.

So, if they truly feel that way, that's fine. I'm not going to try and convince them otherwise. Vote or don't vote. It doesn't matter to me.

Frankly, I think it's a bit silly for someone to claim that my disinterest, my unwillingness to engage such people, and my "do as you want" response is the same as those who are literally encouraging Bernie supporters to not vote for the nominee.

Obviously, he or she didn't get the desired response, and that seems to have frustrated him or her even more.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

309 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question about the TOS "Terms of Service" [View all] randys1 Nov 2015 OP

I think after the primary is over these kind of statement will apply leftofcool Nov 2015 #1

It says never, though randys1 Nov 2015 #2

Bernie is not a Third Party or Republican candidate. If people do not want to support Hillary if she sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #6

Saying you will NOT vote for Hillary is the same as what is in the TOS , but worse is saying randys1 Nov 2015 #7

wow...no Free Speech allowed. SoapBox Nov 2015 #173

Terrifying! A privately-owned pro-Democratic doesn't let people advocate against DanTex Nov 2015 #182

Conservative Democrats yes, progressive Democrats no. nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #211

Wrong Rick. zappaman Nov 2015 #214

Here is one for you. PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #249

Hope you didn't hurt yourself with all that twisting. zappaman Nov 2015 #254

The only twisting PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #255

+a bazillion marym625 Nov 2015 #307

That's right.. Skinner, EarlG, and Elad actually own this board and maintain it.. they can do Cha Nov 2015 #271

No it's not a violation of free speech mythology Nov 2015 #261

I hope you're kidding. Adrahil Nov 2015 #279

Oh, GROW UP. John Poet Nov 2015 #282

First, I have no idea what your OP means. I have not seen any posts advocating merrily Nov 2015 #9

There were two post recently that IMO violated, or got dangerously close violating the TOC brush Nov 2015 #80

Those two are very easy alerts and quick MIRT clean ups. I think the OP is referring to people merrily Nov 2015 #87

Not worth pursuing this whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #89

OOOOOPS! It's a bust! Cha Nov 2015 #266

I think there's a distinction between SAYING you won't vote D and ADVOCATING for not voting D brooklynite Nov 2015 #3

So i can say "I will knowingly NOT vote even though that means a vote FOR the GOP" randys1 Nov 2015 #5

As I understand things, yes brooklynite Nov 2015 #14

That's the same thing brush Nov 2015 #81

No, the Bernie or Bust movement overtly encourages others to join. brooklynite Nov 2015 #105

geesh questionseverything Nov 2015 #305

Why don't you take it up with the person posting such things corkhead Nov 2015 #4

This question would be better if asked in DU's MineralMan Nov 2015 #8

Agreed, I will do that now, thanks. randys1 Nov 2015 #11

yeah, then wait weeks, months or never... luvspeas Nov 2015 #53

Look, 20 min later and there's the reply! uppityperson Nov 2015 #161

September 19th soon enough for you? luvspeas Nov 2015 #170

That is the prerogative of the owner of the board. He forces no one to post here. merrily Nov 2015 #198

I needed a good laugh today... luvspeas Nov 2015 #174

Isn't the OP complaining about DU? Not banning those that in his opinion violate the TOS. nm rhett o rick Nov 2015 #217

I don't know, but you can alert the hosts. MineralMan Nov 2015 #227

Let them write in whomever they wish, its their right GusBob Nov 2015 #10

According to Skinner, it's about the nominee, not just about any Democrat. merrily Nov 2015 #256

You will vote for Bernie then? RobertEarl Nov 2015 #12

I was a Bernie supporter before many of you know who he was. randys1 Nov 2015 #13

Heh RobertEarl Nov 2015 #16

write what out? randys1 Nov 2015 #17

LOL! Claiming a post of mine is untrue when it's true is a sure way to get a reply from me. merrily Nov 2015 #202

Most DUers have known of Senator Sanders, founder of the Progressive Caucus, for a very long time. merrily Nov 2015 #31

I cant respond to what you wrote, I will be silenced if I do. randys1 Nov 2015 #34

I'm saying I haven't noticed any evidence whatever of your alleged support of Sanders, but merrily Nov 2015 #36

You betcha randys1 Nov 2015 #43

Um, nice try. Read Reply 36 again. merrily Nov 2015 #46

I have stated hundreds of times I am a Bernie supporter, I have stated dozens of times randys1 Nov 2015 #47

Actually, I don't know it's true or I would not have posted that I didn't. merrily Nov 2015 #50

AND there was alert stalking of HRC supporters before they moved to there own website. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #108

I sure would. That won't happen, but I would. nt Adrahil Nov 2015 #280

I have not seen anyone advocating for Republicans or third parties. People have expressed who they GoneFishin Nov 2015 #15

No, just reading the rules. Anyone who says they wont support the party in the GE is violating randys1 Nov 2015 #18

Read what you posted again. It says nothing about staying home. merrily Nov 2015 #33

it says in the Mission statement to promote the election of MORE Democrats VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #78

The Whole Thang fredamae Nov 2015 #19

Thanks for posting the word NEVER yet again! randys1 Nov 2015 #21

Depressing turnout is against TOS. "If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing ..." GoneFishin Nov 2015 #25

I do NOTHING but support BOTH candidates here ALL DAY LONG randys1 Nov 2015 #27

Really? Please see Reply 36. merrily Nov 2015 #38

I'll try again. Bernie is NOT a Third Party or Republican Candidate. He is a Democratic Party sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #39

All this will be over sooner than we imagine … and sooner than they expect. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #20

I very much want Bernie to be president, but the odds are he wont be. randys1 Nov 2015 #22

You're a good guy, and I enjoy reading your posts. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #24

Thanks randys1 Nov 2015 #28

It is far from over. We have a lot of work to do and lots of time to get it done. sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #40

I was going to hold my nose and vote Hillary, Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #23

That's hard to imagine. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #26

What? being force fed Hillary... Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #29

I'm just surprised. That's all. Nothing more. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #30

The vehement anti-Bernie sentiment is a total turn off Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #32

I'm not expecting any support at all. Do as you will. Whatever makes you happy. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #37

It's the ISSUES. Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #42

Well, here's what you do: Vote for Bernie in the primary. Don't vote for Hillary in the general. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #44

Wait what? Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #45

Unfortunately, this is beyond my scope of my ability (or desire) to assist. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #66

Cave? Control-Z Nov 2015 #67

Who are you to ask a question like that? senz Nov 2015 #158

senz, baby, on the internet, we're all 22 year old geniuses who just happen to be merrily Nov 2015 #253

No clue what knowing of the existence of a message board with cave in its name has to do with age. merrily Nov 2015 #252

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service jeff47 Nov 2015 #106

Someone alerted on that? Really? (It seems like a pretty tame post.) NurseJackie Nov 2015 #120

Alert stalking isn't just for one "side". jeff47 Nov 2015 #122

Interesting to know. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #125

They're only "punished" if the jury votes 0-7. jeff47 Nov 2015 #131

Got it! NurseJackie Nov 2015 #179

The target of the alert only sees results if the post is hidden jeff47 Nov 2015 #230

Thanks jeff47 :-) NurseJackie Nov 2015 #234

Jury Results Are In... WillyT Nov 2015 #110

How do you feel about Sander's lost years? Control-Z Nov 2015 #63

LOL! merrily Nov 2015 #204

No body is force feeding you Hillary upaloopa Nov 2015 #186

What's hard to imagine? merrily Nov 2015 #35

Someone willing to support whoever gets the D nomination, apparently. Lancero Nov 2015 #59

I don't think that is what Nurse Jackie meant. merrily Nov 2015 #76

"Her supporters" lol. Agschmid Nov 2015 #264

And many would say the same about Bernie supporters. Adrahil Nov 2015 #281

Here is the text of the TOS to which you refer Samantha Nov 2015 #41

Nice post UglyGreed Nov 2015 #97

+ 10000 -- not half bad. senz Nov 2015 #171

Thanks for the post. BigDemVoter Nov 2015 #237

Bernie or bust!! PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #48

Exactly. This comment means you will write in a 3rd party candidate in the GE and if the TOS randys1 Nov 2015 #49

F your loalty oath PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #51

YOu won! BERNIE or BUST is a CLEAR violation of the TOS and yet you won 7-0 randys1 Nov 2015 #58

.. PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #65

HUge badge of honor for you, when you think about it, i would brag, not laugh randys1 Nov 2015 #68

Newsflash PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #69

I know, 7-0 to allow a CLEAR violation of the TOS randys1 Nov 2015 #70

Keep beating that dead horse PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #72

Problem is the jury system treestar Nov 2015 #107

yep randys1 Nov 2015 #109

I am though, remind me what am I deciding again? snooper2 Nov 2015 #152

L0onix got PPR'd. Another Sanders supporter bites the dust. By the way rhett o rick Nov 2015 #185

Actually, that's exactly what it means. NuclearDem Nov 2015 #199

Sounds like you're unclear on the phrase. zappaman Nov 2015 #206

So you are saying that I am not free to say the expression "Bernie or Bust", because someone rhett o rick Nov 2015 #215

No Rick. I can understand why you would want to redefine it to mean something else. zappaman Nov 2015 #216

And I understand why you want to ban all those that don't agree with you. rhett o rick Nov 2015 #219

Now you're just making things up. zappaman Nov 2015 #220

Hey since you side with big money... Agschmid Nov 2015 #265

Get it now because if Clinton wins... zappaman Nov 2015 #267

Then what does Bernie or BUST mean? randys1 Nov 2015 #232

It can mean a lot of different things other than the specific definition you guys give it so you rhett o rick Nov 2015 #240

I FULLY support "purging" DU of people who advocate against voting for Democrats. NYC Liberal Nov 2015 #94

I guess it is a good thing PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #98

The irony of you complaining about loyalty oaths in your previous post is rich, NYC Liberal Nov 2015 #103

I do not do loyalty oaths PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #113

Jury results. Aerows Nov 2015 #55

I was on that jury mvd Nov 2015 #82

Already did. n/t Aerows Nov 2015 #83

Do you mean this? mvd Nov 2015 #86

The admins do not care about the terms of service-case in point... luvspeas Nov 2015 #52

Yes, he did do it for those reasons. We cant discuss it here though randys1 Nov 2015 #54

I'm so sorry that happened to you... luvspeas Nov 2015 #57

yep, openly racist garbage is OK here, pointing it out will get you silenced. randys1 Nov 2015 #60

well, yes. I've been called a bitch from both sides... luvspeas Nov 2015 #61

both sides? I am sorry to hear, if you can link me, please do, I will show my randys1 Nov 2015 #62

I meant in life, not here... luvspeas Nov 2015 #64

Poster, please. You got hides for strongly implying that all supporters of Sanders were racist and merrily Nov 2015 #74

ALL , show me where I ever got even CLOSE to that, please randys1 Nov 2015 #100

I will get the links. Also the link where you missed Manny's sarcasm and thanked him in caps merrily Nov 2015 #102

And in ALL 3 i did not ONCE say all, i said the EXACT same thing in all 3 randys1 Nov 2015 #104

In all 3, you strongly implied Bernie supporters were racist and sexist. merrily Nov 2015 #175

What do you know? Because that is simply not true... luvspeas Nov 2015 #144

luvpeas is defending his or her posts against my post to randys1 about randys1's posts? How odd! merrily Nov 2015 #191

your keyboard keys must make a nice little tapping noise when you hit them... luvspeas Nov 2015 #210

LOL! Claiming my post is untrue when it's true is an almost sure way to get a reply from me. merrily Nov 2015 #212

I'm sorry about those hides, randy.. Cha Nov 2015 #268

This Sanders voter agrees with you. blm Nov 2015 #56

I agree. We should stick to the rules. bravenak Nov 2015 #71

No ambiguity. The rules seem to be very clear and explicit to me … NurseJackie Nov 2015 #73

Or this whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #84

I think the owners know that primaries bring out the worst and the best in people. Myself included. bravenak Nov 2015 #88

correction grasswire Nov 2015 #238

No. Sorry. bravenak Nov 2015 #239

Differences of opinion are what make horse races. Mark Twain Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #75

Unless we are talking newbies that MIRT can dispatch, a lot of it is up to community standards, merrily Nov 2015 #114

I would think that echo chambers that specialize in "Me too!" would lose their appeal. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #128

Yes, liberals are wandering away, which means the minority is, way beyond its numbers, merrily Nov 2015 #141

Too bad there is not a Liberal Underground-type site. kath Nov 2015 #235

I understand that sites to support Sanders exist and/or are in the works. merrily Nov 2015 #236

yes, that is an interesting conundrum for owner. grasswire Nov 2015 #241

The owner has at least two other sites, but you might ask him in ATA. merrily Nov 2015 #243

I admit I did have a thread stating UglyGreed Nov 2015 #77

I voted for her in 2012 and survived!! Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #91

I was going to vote for her in 2012 UglyGreed Nov 2015 #93

yeah, but you probably didn't mean it...n/t luvspeas Nov 2015 #209

Writing in Bernie would still be voting for a Democrat. I am not going to debate merrily Nov 2015 #96

I understand your point UglyGreed Nov 2015 #167

We should all be able to do that without being put on the spot. Again, I bet several people are merrily Nov 2015 #189

My edit to my earlier post redacts the write in option. It's the nominee, not any Democrat. merrily Nov 2015 #207

Unless that Democrat is a Self Described Socialist VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #180

Irrelevant. The rule would be the same about writing in O'Malley, a lifelong Democrat. Jim Lane Nov 2015 #200

Irrellevant??? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #203

Has Bernie disavowed it yet? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #205

Who cares? My point is that the ToS doesn't apply the distinction you bring up thrice daily. Jim Lane Nov 2015 #213

I havent labeled him... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #221

My position TeddyR Nov 2015 #79

Isn't she currently seeking the Green Presidential nomination? merrily Nov 2015 #99

I believe she was their candidate TeddyR Nov 2015 #115

Stein was last time. Cynthia was the time before. Am I confusing the surname? Is it McKinnon? merrily Nov 2015 #119

This is for you, randys1 senz Nov 2015 #85

Fortunately, someone was just banned for that very reason BainsBane Nov 2015 #90

Oh well. zappaman Nov 2015 #92

He got busted. Cha Nov 2015 #269

Wow. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #95

FAN TASTIC randys1 Nov 2015 #101

33 thousand posts UglyGreed Nov 2015 #111

Seriously. bunnies Nov 2015 #143

I added the sarcasm tag UglyGreed Nov 2015 #146

I do. :) bunnies Nov 2015 #151

BTW isn't this post UglyGreed Nov 2015 #150

heh. Yes actually. bunnies Nov 2015 #155

no because they don't really mean it...n/t luvspeas Nov 2015 #208

Guess not N/T UglyGreed Nov 2015 #223

Good! MoonRiver Nov 2015 #116

Whoever alerted and got him banned: for shame. senz Nov 2015 #117

Jury results marym625 Nov 2015 #135

Thank you, marym! senz Nov 2015 #163

I'm pretty flabbergasted by all of it. marym625 Nov 2015 #188

I wonder: if L0onix had posted a link instead of a quote, would a ban have occurred. merrily Nov 2015 #246

seems that quoting has become a bad thing marym625 Nov 2015 #247

Especially quoting Sanders BainsBane Nov 2015 #248

Huh? merrily Nov 2015 #258

Tyranny of the majority Capt. Obvious Nov 2015 #297

I dunno. What has happened to DU is a shame. nt merrily Nov 2015 #251

yep. sadly. marym625 Nov 2015 #263

EarlG banned him BainsBane Nov 2015 #138

Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #195

WTF are you even talking about? BainsBane Nov 2015 #244

That was interesting. bravenak Nov 2015 #250

You were banned for creating a sock and posting with both usernames at the same time. polly7 Nov 2015 #201

Oh my. senz Nov 2015 #229

Reason why y'all are on your own in this freaking cesspool of a forum... ScreamingMeemie Nov 2015 #259

LOL! That alert is hilarious. polly7 Nov 2015 #276

Your obsession with this is not in line R B Garr Nov 2015 #277

No obsession whatsoever. polly7 Nov 2015 #278

Your obsessions with posters are very obvious R B Garr Nov 2015 #283

I just answered you. Look up. nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #284

I'll be looking for your post to Admin then R B Garr Nov 2015 #286

LMFAO. nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #287

Yeah, LOL indeed. At least you're admitting you R B Garr Nov 2015 #293

You brought your mirror right? JTFrog Nov 2015 #289

Replied above. nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #290

Yea, and I fixed it for you. JTFrog Nov 2015 #291

You fixed something for 'you' in your head, if that makes you feel good - awesome. nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #292

I'm sorry I can't fix what's in your head. JTFrog Nov 2015 #294

Gonna have a GREAT day, thanks. You too, eh?! nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #295

I think I am. JTFrog Nov 2015 #296

I was on the jury Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #157

Gosh, and here I always thought you were such a senz Nov 2015 #165

The post appeared to be a pretty blatant violation of TOS Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #168

Not really.. you just helped get a Hide. He would have been banned anyway. Cha Nov 2015 #270

Are you really saying "shame" to EarlG, the Admin who did the ban? uppityperson Nov 2015 #166

EarlG banned him. & he banned Sgt benobo and SKP before that for using the c word. Cha Nov 2015 #272

Well there ya go... Bobbie Jo Nov 2015 #118

And L0oniX did not even advocate it, it was just a copy from an article. There were posters below LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #121

I didn't read the thread in question BainsBane Nov 2015 #124

I wish I had all the links to HRC supporters who said they would write in her name on the ballot. LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #126

In this election? BainsBane Nov 2015 #129

Yea and in 2008 also.. In this election they suffixed with "Of course Hillary won't loose" Or LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #137

Then the answer is no BainsBane Nov 2015 #140

There have been posts to the effect that people will not vote for Bernie or or a "socialist" merrily Nov 2015 #257

They don't say it here on DU Capt. Obvious Nov 2015 #298

And as always, her opponents were too decent to punish. senz Nov 2015 #153

When I was a kid we heard stories about the Soviet Union senz Nov 2015 #139

Time to sharpen the blades? daleanime Nov 2015 #112

I thought she had already won the nomination. She already has all the super delegates doesn't she? LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #123

She had an overwhelming number of them in 2008, too. Then, they switched. merrily Nov 2015 #197

yes, I would imagine that site owners will lose a lot of revenue. grasswire Nov 2015 #245

Sugesting people don't vote? IS that a TOS violation? Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #127

I did that where? randys1 Nov 2015 #130

I can point to several Hillary supporters who have Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #132

Where are Hillary supporters saying that? randys1 Nov 2015 #133

Look around Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #134

But I dont see any Hillary people telling people not to vote. randys1 Nov 2015 #136

look upthread. nt bunnies Nov 2015 #147

You will have to link me where Hillary voters are telling people not to vote for the Democrat randys1 Nov 2015 #148

Theyre saying not to vote for Hillary. bunnies Nov 2015 #154

Hillary voters are saying not to vote for Hillary? randys1 Nov 2015 #156

#44 is one. And yes its probably out of frustration. bunnies Nov 2015 #159

<3 NurseJackie Nov 2015 #181

Precisely! It appears that Cosmic Kitten may be referring to an earlier post of mine … NurseJackie Nov 2015 #162

The simple fact is the both sides argument doesnt work here anymore than it does randys1 Nov 2015 #164

I'm still of the opinion that these folks will do exactly as they please. No amount of "begging" … NurseJackie Nov 2015 #172

Worse...I see her supporters saying that we can only vote for her...we cannot vote how we want. SoapBox Nov 2015 #176

Feel free to point those out. William769 Nov 2015 #224

yeah Cha Nov 2015 #273

depends on your perspective i suppose elana i am Nov 2015 #142

Worse? President Carson appointing a Roe ending SC justice is the same as Hillary???????? randys1 Nov 2015 #145

kicking the can down the road elana i am Nov 2015 #187

DU is very liberal Prism Nov 2015 #149

Hmmmm Dem2 Nov 2015 #160

We saw the screenshots. senz Nov 2015 #196

Skinner answered, here's the link to the ATA thread uppityperson Nov 2015 #169

A very good answer, I might add... SidDithers Nov 2015 #178

He's Right. Of course, Skinner is a smart guy. Warren DeMontague Nov 2015 #222

+1 merrily Nov 2015 #262

Here is a copy of Skinner's answer bravenak Nov 2015 #177

Thanks for clarifying bravenak. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #183

Hve I ever called you brilliant? You are BRILLIANT! I shall post it. bravenak Nov 2015 #184

I would be grateful just knowing that I am posting with respect to Democratic Underground. misterhighwasted Nov 2015 #193

Respect is a big thing to me. I find myself apologizing at times, but it helps build character. bravenak Nov 2015 #194

Ahh yes-the rules...but do they really mean it? luvspeas Nov 2015 #218

I never know what the real rules are. bravenak Nov 2015 #306

Uh huh... randys1 Nov 2015 #190

You were right bravenak Nov 2015 #192

point out where a no-vote intention is a violation stupidicus Nov 2015 #225

TOS says this is a place for people who work to elect more Democrats, it says that randys1 Nov 2015 #226

in other words, you can't stupidicus Nov 2015 #228

No words in mouth, THIS is what Skinner said randys1 Nov 2015 #231

that's meaningless for our purposes stupidicus Nov 2015 #233

"whatever trips your triggers" Cha Nov 2015 #274

This message was self-deleted by its author fishwax Nov 2015 #242

This must pose a serious problem for DU since Hillary sounds like a Ragan Era Republican and how can Todays_Illusion Nov 2015 #260

Democratic Underground's owners and Admins are Hillary supporters.. why don't you ask them Cha Nov 2015 #275

This is an "inconvenient truth" to some here. MoonRiver Nov 2015 #285

Fuck your TOS. John Poet Nov 2015 #288

You and others have shown severe, almost violent reactions to being told about randys1 Nov 2015 #299

Post removed Post removed Nov 2015 #300

More violent responses randys1 Nov 2015 #301

"Violent"? Didn't your mother ever teach you the one John Poet Nov 2015 #303

alert results irisblue Nov 2015 #304

One yes. Two, maybe. HassleCat Nov 2015 #302

There is so much awesome in this thread. I love it Number23 Nov 2015 #308

Kinda worked out that way, didnt it randys1 Nov 2015 #309