Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

(101,938 posts)

4. Prove the allegations are true and I will donate $100.00 to DU and verify the donation.

Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:36 PM

Nov 2015

Acceptable proof will be the identity of the person who made the offer and the person who accepted it.

Thank you in advance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

re: Confessions from a Hillary Shill [View all] vorgan24 Nov 2015 OP

Authenticity. RiverLover Nov 2015 #1

From one of SFP's own mods... vorgan24 Nov 2015 #3

I've re-read that topic a few times... vorgan24 Nov 2015 #9

Zero proof is not the same as likely bogus dreamnightwind Nov 2015 #12

Unproven claims are false, which is a synonym for bogus. vorgan24 Nov 2015 #14

No, they are merely unproven. Twisty words is all you got. dreamnightwind Nov 2015 #15

Ok, I was incorrect in that definition. vorgan24 Nov 2015 #16

Yes you were incorrect dreamnightwind Nov 2015 #20

K&R mcar Nov 2015 #2

Was "shrill" a typo or a Freudian slip? frazzled Nov 2015 #5

k and R riversedge Nov 2015 #11

I wondered when that crapload of codswallop would be removed... Spazito Nov 2015 #13

And not unexpectedly, Le Taz Hot Nov 2015 #17

whatever the point bigtree Nov 2015 #18

You hammered home a point alright, but I doubt it's the one you intended. stevenleser Nov 2015 #19