Hillary's bad judment makes her unfit to be Commander-In-Chief.

[zalinda]

288. Papa Bush didn't take him out

because he was warned that he would destabilize Iraq, if he killed Sadam. Sadam was an evil man, but he held Iraq together as a country. Things were actually better there under Sadam than they are now, especially for women.


I’m afraid the bitter truth is Iraq and Libya were better off under the tyrants toppled by an arrogant and naive West

Cruel and despotic though he was, Saddam did offer Iraq a measure of stability, which was destroyed by the invasion. This repulsive strongman at least held his country together, which the divisive Shia-dominated government in Baghdad cannot do.

A similar point can be made about the no less repellent Gaddafi. In the Libya over which he presided for more than 40 years, there were no factions of militias killing innocent people and destroying their homes and livelihoods.

Where would you prefer to try to live a half-normal life — in Gaddafi’s mostly peaceable Tripoli or in a city fought over by pitiless gunmen?

Would it be better to inhabit Saddam Hussein’s Mosul or the city now transformed into a killing field by Islamic State? I know where my preferences would lie.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2711464/STEPHEN-GLOVER-I-m-afraid-bitter-truth-Iraq-Libya-better-tyrants-toppled-arrogant-naive-West.html