Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why should we vote for anyone in the primaries if they refuse to shout about this great injustice? [View all]Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)7. Sorry, this is 100% about The Pentagon and why no one is talking about The Pentagon, including
Clinton. I support them all, November, 2015, and I prefer Clinton now, because I like preferential balloting systems and own a calander, and refuse to not think that way.
I reserve judgment on them all until they have said what they must say about this single subject of bloated military spending and the lack of control by civilian authoity over justice in the military....why does The Pentagon have completed control of the investigation of a potential American war crime, for example?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why should we vote for anyone in the primaries if they refuse to shout about this great injustice? [View all]
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
OP
you are aware that Clinton's policies supports the MIC far more than Sanders' ?
ish of the hammer
Nov 2015
#48
Libya, no-fly zone Syria, Victoria Nuland Ukraine, any number of MIC related companies donating to
ish of the hammer
Nov 2015
#60
oh really? Here is the BIG picture the ACTUAL public record ....not your cute little list...
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2015
#62
I am aware of the votes Sanders has made for military contractors, he continues to vote for the F-35
Thinkingabout
Nov 2015
#63
Point to any evidence that Sanders will significantly cut that military percentage?
brooklynite
Nov 2015
#87
Wont happen, defense contractors love Sanders, he keep giving them more contracts.
Thinkingabout
Nov 2015
#97
If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick or care for our elderly ...
Scuba
Nov 2015
#2
I don't get it, why are the liberal candidates, top to bottom not talking about the military bloat?
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#5
Just 2 days ago: Senator Bernie Sanders Votes Against Increasing Defense Spending
think
Nov 2015
#13
Excellent! A good start on the talk.....now how about a 50% reduction, all going to domestic?
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#15
No argument here. Sanders would work hard to cut military spending. As to what percentage
think
Nov 2015
#23
Reducing the military will have to be a progression, an evolution and not a revolution.
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#29
I think it's because the military/security state is actually running the government.
jalan48
Nov 2015
#18
And it is easy to hide fraud, waste, and price gouging in a system hidden behind a wall of national
GoneFishin
Nov 2015
#81
Oh don't worry Hillary cares a LOT about our children, our sick, and our elderly...
Still In Wisconsin
Nov 2015
#75
Sorry, this is 100% about The Pentagon and why no one is talking about The Pentagon, including
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#7
China and Cuba send doctors, engineers and teachers everywhere instead of arms...and will win
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#111
In terms of percentage of GDP, Russia still outspends us. But in terms of real dollars...wow.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#9
Sanders is clearly against more military spending, but is he for drastically reducing it?
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#12
Facts speak for themselves: "Defense Industry Embraces Hillary By Far Their Favorite Dem."
99th_Monkey
Nov 2015
#20
Clinton is perhaps the lesser of three evils for MIC, but MIC must be getting nervous at all the
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#27
I don't think MIC will be nervous about Clintons leftist rhetoric until she returns their $$$$
99th_Monkey
Nov 2015
#30
quick quiz question which candidate recently said they WOULD bomb Iran if.......?
azurnoir
Nov 2015
#107
Yes, that's exactly what MIC endor$ement$ and Ca$h are doing: betting on their darling to win
99th_Monkey
Nov 2015
#61
I love how slinging CT accusations distracts from your whole-hearted embrace of Citizens United
99th_Monkey
Nov 2015
#82
No, you're right...the Pentagon is not a sacred cow and Pentagon leadership have wanted to reduce.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2015
#37
The same F-35 that Hillary promised to supply to Netanyahu when she was flexing muscle..
frylock
Nov 2015
#50
Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department
Ichingcarpenter
Nov 2015
#16
This is a human rights issue, not a political issue and it does not need to be politicized to be
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#19
News Flash: "Senator Bernie Sanders Votes Against Increasing Defense Spending"
99th_Monkey
Nov 2015
#22
And we wonder why are schools are crumbling, our infrastructure is obsolete, our water system is in
in_cog_ni_to
Nov 2015
#26
Sacred cows of the military and corporate fat cats. Now there is an image waiting for a metaphor!
Fred Sanders
Nov 2015
#32
US military activity in Africa has been growing for some time yet is rarely discussed by MSM or
Ford_Prefect
Nov 2015
#43
Bernie does more than shout. He just voted against the "defense" spending bill.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2015
#46
He also proposed a war tax on the wealthiest too, hitting those that benefit from military spending
cascadiance
Nov 2015
#52
Tell a typical white American that most of the world is another color and they FREAK OUT....
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#64
Seems a conservative like yourself wouldn't want U.S. taxpayers to pay for it
dreamnightwind
Nov 2015
#93