2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I continue to be utterly mystified. [View all]polly7
(20,582 posts)The troops were THERE, they NEEDED funding. No-one had any intention of scaling back or bringing them home! To believe that, you'd have to believe the invasion itself - which necessitated the need for so many lies (that should be your first clue it wasn't just a litte get in, see how it goes thing) hadn't fully committed those troops to kill and be killed for PROVEN LIES for the goals they had. Nothing was going to end it until they got what they'd schemed and plotted for.
It's all in the LIES.
No-one had the ability to scale it back once it was allowed to proceed. Good grief.
Do some reading on the PNAC and notice what it says about Iraq, who pushed for it and who signed it. Also, the Downing Street Memos, the Wikipedia leaks - so many sources to learn just how badly Iraq was wanted. Then add in the Big Oil meetings pre-invasion, the map of Iraq's resources drawn up, and all the extremely well-plotted and planned lies it took .... do you REALLY believe anyone had the ability to 'scale it back' with a vote to not fund those troops sacrificed for this sham once they'd finally got their great opportunity?