2016 Postmortem

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)

59. Newspaper sources would be good to compare now...

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 11:52 PM

Nov 2015

Also, the point I have made is that this survey should have had ALL Democratic candidates listed as a weighted choice.

When you caucus with the Democrats, you vote with the Democrats.

Your great concern for how I spend my energy is noted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Official 2015 Democratic Party Survey COULDN'T BE MORE BIASED... [View all] MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 OP

It's because there are so many Democratic candidates. Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #1

I don't buy that for ONE SECOND, Cali... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #2

I changed my address recently Cali_Democrat Nov 2015 #3

Please, please do... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #4

So a survey sent to Party activists and supporters needs to provide a checkoff list of candidates brooklynite Nov 2015 #5

Ah yes ... senz Nov 2015 #10

It IS catchy, isn't it? brooklynite Nov 2015 #11

Yes, you go ahead and do that... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #12

Oh, I know exactly what they are...butterfly nets brooklynite Nov 2015 #14

Well, if they send to people with a "significantly higher level of political awareness.".. MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #54

I must admit I'm puzzled why this is such a big deal. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #6

LOL! DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2015 #7

So true and well put. Nt NCTraveler Nov 2015 #8

The post requires that you know how to read for comprehension, Jackie... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #16

Thanks for clarifying a confusing and disorganized post. I appreciate that. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #21

Must be the confused and disorganized state one gets... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #24

For an issue that's so important NurseJackie Nov 2015 #38

I see, I just get to do that.. So, what's the point of breaking it down further? MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #41

So you're giving up. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #44

Your posts continue to be silly and don't address the issue... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #48

There's nothing dishonest about it. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #53

It's disgusting to hear that a survey asking questions of the voter isn't important... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #55

Nighty nite. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #56

Please. I believe you can make your case without insulting another poster's reading comprehension.. blue neen Nov 2015 #47

That isn't true, blue MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #50

Sorry, but I am most certainly being objective. blue neen Nov 2015 #58

Newspaper sources would be good to compare now... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #59

Bernie is in charge of his own name recognition. LuvLoogie Nov 2015 #43

"Catch up" to what? MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #61

The disaffected Left is a school of fish. LuvLoogie Nov 2015 #62

Says the person who thinks these things are equal... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #68

Despite the logic that the last thing you hear is often demwing Nov 2015 #64

The outrage is absurd. NurseJackie Nov 2015 #65

of course demwing Nov 2015 #66

I know, isn't that crazy? NurseJackie Nov 2015 #67

It's amazing that this is the only survey to hear from the voters... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #72

You said it best... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #70

We already know that DWS has zero integrity AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #9

Enough of what we can expect... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #25

Their corporate masters would rather risk throwing the election AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #30

I agree, multiple choice is standard for this type of questionnaire. senz Nov 2015 #13

They know she will automatically win on name recognition AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #33

Folks, you DO know that this is just a fundraising pitch, and the survey is meaningless? brooklynite Nov 2015 #15

It's clear who you are kidding... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #17

Of course I vote... brooklynite Nov 2015 #18

Huh... you must not think kindly of how they mail out to party members, either... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #19

-I- think its a huge waste of time and effort... brooklynite Nov 2015 #20

You know... This isn't some project management fundraising moment... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #23

Brooklyn must be one of those elite UglyGreed Nov 2015 #26

I haven't received this particular one � NurseJackie Nov 2015 #22

I got the same piece of shit survey. I'm going to call. I won't be as onecaliberal Nov 2015 #27

Well, don't give them any excuse to hang up on you, one... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #28

I won't help fund their third way corporate, screw the working people and middle class onecaliberal Nov 2015 #31

You said a mouthful... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #34

Truth hurts? onecaliberal Nov 2015 #35

Shit no... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #37

Sorry, I should have been more clear, my comment onecaliberal Nov 2015 #49

That's why my mother and grandmother would say... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #51

It sounds like they were very wise. You do them great justice with good judgment. onecaliberal Nov 2015 #57

I Just Replied To A Thread Saying The Very Same Thing! ChiciB1 Nov 2015 #29

..." many don't have much respect for us anymore..." MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #36

I Told My Husband Just Recently That I Feel Something Is ChiciB1 Nov 2015 #73

This was done intentionally because Hillary has name recognition AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #32

What a messed up bit of logic that is Persondem Nov 2015 #39

That is about the poorest use of logic I've read tonight MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #42

It's what they do AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #45

Just for this OP ... Persondem Nov 2015 #40

Dear God! They let you pick WHOEVER YOU WANT!? BIAS!! Adrahil Nov 2015 #46

Read for meaning... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #52

Faux poutrage du jour wyldwolf Nov 2015 #60

If it had said "Who do you support? Write her name here....." Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #63

It's biased... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #71

The stuff that comes from the DNC goes straight to the shredder. Vinca Nov 2015 #69