Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: NYT Editorial:Her Effort To Tug On Americans Heartstrings INSTEAD Of Explaining Her Wall Street TIES [View all]winter is coming
(11,785 posts)82. But she's proactive!
She took in $$ from Wall Street before 9/11. I guess they knew they'd want to thank her some day, so they got an early start on it. Expecting, of course, nothing in return.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT Editorial:Her Effort To Tug On Americans Heartstrings INSTEAD Of Explaining Her Wall Street TIES [View all]
Segami
Nov 2015
OP
Even Giukiani isn't known as "Guilliani"! That's better than Sanders' typical:
George II
Nov 2015
#20
I am sure she told them in those speeches they paid so much for that the speech and campaign money
Dustlawyer
Nov 2015
#101
+1 Excellent distinction! Attempting to exploit 911 cannot sit well with a NY paper.
merrily
Nov 2015
#31
A paper that has lost all credibility since they rubber stamped the WMDs from Judy Miller, and had
still_one
Nov 2015
#26
I don't care who they endorse, they are still a sorry excuse for a Newspaper. Same
still_one
Nov 2015
#32
You said it, jwirr. But you left out broadcast network deregulation. Can't forget FOX and Rushhead.
hedda_foil
Nov 2015
#61
"At worst it was the type of cynical move that Mrs. Clinton would have *admired* in Republicans."
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#16
Emotional manipulation using 9/11 15 years later after it was used to the point
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#17
K&R. This is what Hillary is about -- campaign contributions and then paybacks for campaign
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#18
The interesting thing is that she's already moved dramatically from where she was to where Bernie is
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#91
But it's misleading, and he does it all the time. Why not let him speak for himself?
George II
Nov 2015
#35
What is misleading about it? Again, the poster is entitled to write a subject line for his OP.
merrily
Nov 2015
#37
THANK GOD Hillary is here to rescue Wall Street! Super Girl gets her super powers from Goldman!
whereisjustice
Nov 2015
#47
"impugn my integrity" Oh please Hillary, it is what it is, own it. But don't tell us how you rebuilt
YOHABLO
Nov 2015
#56
Don't worry, I'm sure her surogates will just buy more poll results to smooth it all over...
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#93
The Clintons paid a 35.7% tax rate [40 million in total taxes] over the last 7 years
JTShroyer
Nov 2015
#72
They made $140 million shilling for near ZERO tax rate for corporations who earn billions
whereisjustice
Nov 2015
#74
Please provide links for where Hillary pushes for a "near ZERO corporate tax rate."
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#105
Doesn't the NYT know it's own Paul Krugman says Hillary has the better plan for Wall Street?
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#103