Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: NYT Editorial:Her Effort To Tug On Americans Heartstrings INSTEAD Of Explaining Her Wall Street TIES [View all]jwirr
(39,215 posts)84. Yes, I made that mistake also. He sounded good but I was
not listening to what he said only how he said it. He is a good speaker.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT Editorial:Her Effort To Tug On Americans Heartstrings INSTEAD Of Explaining Her Wall Street TIES [View all]
Segami
Nov 2015
OP
Even Giukiani isn't known as "Guilliani"! That's better than Sanders' typical:
George II
Nov 2015
#20
I am sure she told them in those speeches they paid so much for that the speech and campaign money
Dustlawyer
Nov 2015
#101
+1 Excellent distinction! Attempting to exploit 911 cannot sit well with a NY paper.
merrily
Nov 2015
#31
A paper that has lost all credibility since they rubber stamped the WMDs from Judy Miller, and had
still_one
Nov 2015
#26
I don't care who they endorse, they are still a sorry excuse for a Newspaper. Same
still_one
Nov 2015
#32
You said it, jwirr. But you left out broadcast network deregulation. Can't forget FOX and Rushhead.
hedda_foil
Nov 2015
#61
"At worst it was the type of cynical move that Mrs. Clinton would have *admired* in Republicans."
Spitfire of ATJ
Nov 2015
#16
Emotional manipulation using 9/11 15 years later after it was used to the point
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#17
K&R. This is what Hillary is about -- campaign contributions and then paybacks for campaign
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#18
The interesting thing is that she's already moved dramatically from where she was to where Bernie is
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#91
But it's misleading, and he does it all the time. Why not let him speak for himself?
George II
Nov 2015
#35
What is misleading about it? Again, the poster is entitled to write a subject line for his OP.
merrily
Nov 2015
#37
THANK GOD Hillary is here to rescue Wall Street! Super Girl gets her super powers from Goldman!
whereisjustice
Nov 2015
#47
"impugn my integrity" Oh please Hillary, it is what it is, own it. But don't tell us how you rebuilt
YOHABLO
Nov 2015
#56
Don't worry, I'm sure her surogates will just buy more poll results to smooth it all over...
Bubzer
Nov 2015
#93
The Clintons paid a 35.7% tax rate [40 million in total taxes] over the last 7 years
JTShroyer
Nov 2015
#72
They made $140 million shilling for near ZERO tax rate for corporations who earn billions
whereisjustice
Nov 2015
#74
Please provide links for where Hillary pushes for a "near ZERO corporate tax rate."
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#105
Doesn't the NYT know it's own Paul Krugman says Hillary has the better plan for Wall Street?
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#103