2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: NYT Editorial:Her Effort To Tug On Americans Heartstrings INSTEAD Of Explaining Her Wall Street TIES [View all]R B Garr
(17,985 posts)Here's what he said that had to do with her ENTIRE career (his words). Apparently only he can talk about her entire career, but she can't respond about her entire career. His comments are generalized slurs taken from his well-worn and one-trick-pony stump speech:
This is taken from about the 1:01 hour mark of the 2-hour debate. You truncated to fit your own agenda:
"....why do, why over HER POLITICAL CAREER, has Wall Street been a major, the major campaign contributor to Hillary Clinton..."
The part you quoted starts around the 1:03 mark. She had previously had a full and complete answer about the influence of her contributors until Sanders started his meandering stump speech, trying to weave her into part of it. That's when she separated herself from his musings with this answer.