2016 Postmortem

keithbvadu2

(40,915 posts)

59. You're sure this is not about Bush and

Reply to sibelian (Original post)

Sat Nov 21, 2015, 10:35 PM

Nov 2015

Jeff Gannon?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

First Gay President.... [View all] sibelian Nov 2015 OP

Easy for you, with your Gay Privilege and all MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #1

Dude, only half funny sibelian Nov 2015 #2

Poe's Law is a cruel thing MannyGoldstein Nov 2015 #6

there definitely is a suspiciously-quick turn toward separation over solidarity MisterP Nov 2015 #30

YEAH, GAY=WHITE, WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT? sibelian Nov 2015 #44

it might be a cultural thing, but also there's moral currency in being persecuted MisterP Nov 2015 #47

I see the entire mess as relational thinking which I distrust deeply. sibelian Nov 2015 #48

it's an empty word game AND it's one-dimensionally identitarian! whee! MisterP Nov 2015 #49

OOOOOOHHHHH my FUCKING GOOOOOOD sibelian Nov 2015 #54

oh, no, I broke your brain! MisterP Nov 2015 #55

WHY DID YOU SHOW THAT TO ME? sibelian Nov 2015 #56

but the real point is that a competitive or even "misery-poker" approach to issues always has MisterP Nov 2015 #57

WHAT DO THEY WANT? sibelian Nov 2015 #58

In point of fact most historians say we have already had a gay US President dsc Nov 2015 #5

I think you're missing the point demwing Nov 2015 #16

No way! hootinholler Nov 2015 #28

we still haven't had a woman AlbertCat Nov 2015 #40

Sounds like common sense to me. NCTraveler Nov 2015 #3

Ah, DU is back to insinuating that... JaneyVee Nov 2015 #4

Well, some people *outside DU*, I hasten to add, have actually SAID so. sibelian Nov 2015 #11

No, they've done it here too, lots of times. And continue to. beerandjesus Nov 2015 #15

Well, there's a surprise. sibelian Nov 2015 #17

Well, I should be more specific. beerandjesus Nov 2015 #19

That's indecipherable. sibelian Nov 2015 #35

Hahaha! beerandjesus Nov 2015 #43

No, they've done it here too, lots of times. And continue to. AlbertCat Nov 2015 #41

my father's wife refuses to discuss the primary - she wants a women president before she dies tk2kewl Nov 2015 #34

Well, there you go. sibelian Nov 2015 #36

We've already had a gay president... Agschmid Nov 2015 #7

It would be cool to have one that was out treestar Nov 2015 #8

It would. Agschmid Nov 2015 #9

Well, OUT, I meant. sibelian Nov 2015 #12

I do. Agschmid Nov 2015 #13

Faith in WHAT? sibelian Nov 2015 #14

Yup you were serious... Agschmid Nov 2015 #18

Yes. I was serious. sibelian Nov 2015 #22

+1. And not just G but B, too. closeupready Nov 2015 #25

We've already had a gay president... AlbertCat Nov 2015 #42

I agree! This female will never vote for a woman simply because she's a woman. RiverLover Nov 2015 #10

What if there was a strongly qualified gay candidate that you supported. DanTex Nov 2015 #20

That would be very annoying but it would be JUST as annoying sibelian Nov 2015 #23

I have been a lover of "lady parts" lifelong SwampG8r Nov 2015 #21

I don't get it. sibelian Nov 2015 #24

I can only say she can do nothing to SwampG8r Nov 2015 #26

Well, sir, I have known many heterosexuals in my time. A fine people. sibelian Nov 2015 #27

Not that there's anything wrong with that... SwampG8r Nov 2015 #29

Nothing wrong with a white male president. Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #51

I'm pretty sure we've already had a gay president LuckyTheDog Nov 2015 #31

Some say Lincoln was gay stevenleser Nov 2015 #39

If a gay nominee was awseome Sheepshank Nov 2015 #32

No! LORD, no... sibelian Nov 2015 #33

Yeah... but it's HER turn gawddammit. 99Forever Nov 2015 #37

Nobody ever says that except for her detractors. Metric System Nov 2015 #38

This is the best post I've read on DU in a long time EvolveOrConvolve Nov 2015 #45

I'm having a hard time believing this site is progressive in any way any more. sibelian Nov 2015 #46

Link to where a DUer said they plan to vote for Hillary purely because she is a woman? Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #50

Don't worry about it, Nye. sibelian Nov 2015 #53

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #52

You're sure this is not about Bush and keithbvadu2 Nov 2015 #59

LORD, I hope not. sibelian Nov 2015 #60