Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)

9. Maybe she meant she was ducking snipes

Reply to peacebird (Reply #7)

Mon Nov 23, 2015, 09:27 AM

Nov 2015

Or maybe she was saying snipes are like ducks

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary is most accurate on climate science!! [View all] Adrahil Nov 2015 OP

Bernie was dinged for saying global warming could make the earth uninhabitable.... When in reality peacebird Nov 2015 #1

true. But.... Adrahil Nov 2015 #2

I guess they don't take off points for being proFracking or supporting the extractive fuel industry peacebird Nov 2015 #6

Technically, there are no parts of the Earth that are uninhabitable now; given the right technology Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #10

What Bernie meant was uninhabitable for humans which is different Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #3

Bernie's statement was imprecise. msrizzo Nov 2015 #4

How would you have said it precisely? nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #11

There is a lot of imprecision in science Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #14

The problem with overstating it, is that he overstated it nt. BootinUp Nov 2015 #5

Was Hillary imprecise when she described ducking sniper fire at the airport? Or just lying? peacebird Nov 2015 #7

Its not a question that anyone but Hillary haters care about. nt BootinUp Nov 2015 #8

Like that Iraq war vote she cast...? n/t xocet Nov 2015 #17

Hillary explained it more than once. Read her own words. I personally, have never BootinUp Nov 2015 #18

The people who voted for the war are the ones (in addition to Bush et al) who are xocet Nov 2015 #19

I don't find that argument compelling. BootinUp Nov 2015 #22

Which part of "the people who voted for the war and Bush" equates with blaming "the Democrats"? xocet Nov 2015 #23

Enough. nt BootinUp Nov 2015 #24

That clearly indicates that you cannot defend your position against a simple argument. xocet Nov 2015 #25

Take it however you want. Stop highjacking threads. BootinUp Nov 2015 #26

It is not up to my interpretation. Haters gonna hate, right? Or is that an ignorant phrase? xocet Nov 2015 #33

She did. Based on the information she had she voted to send BootinUp Nov 2015 #35

No one cares that she lied about coming under sniper fire for an event she knew was filmed? peacebird Nov 2015 #20

No. No one cares about that. nt BootinUp Nov 2015 #21

Maybe she meant she was ducking snipes Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #9

I doubt that was all he was dinged for hootinholler Nov 2015 #16

She deserves credit for making accurate statements Kentonio Nov 2015 #12

An interesting graphic: Buzz Clik Nov 2015 #13

i feel compelled to point out restorefreedom Nov 2015 #30

What exactly is an "establishment candidate"? Buzz Clik Nov 2015 #32

the ones the msm and the corporate world like restorefreedom Nov 2015 #34

Yes. Adrahil Nov 2015 #36

It would be interested to do a mean separation (or its equivalent) on the scores Buzz Clik Nov 2015 #38

Good to know. Thanks! (nt) NurseJackie Nov 2015 #15

One of the 'scientists' gave Bush 100! I wonder how he scored Bernie? immoderate Nov 2015 #27

yes, i shared an observation in #13 that is similar. nt restorefreedom Nov 2015 #31

I call a wee bit of bullshit! TM99 Nov 2015 #28

some have called bernie an alarmist restorefreedom Nov 2015 #29

Well she ceratainly sonofspy777 Nov 2015 #37

I saw the article. I got a kick out of this line (iirc) .... Persondem Nov 2015 #39