2016 Postmortem

think

(11,641 posts)

80. Thank you for taking the time to put all this information together and posting. /nt

Reply to OnyxCollie (Reply #65)

Mon Nov 23, 2015, 01:33 PM

Nov 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

131 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WOW... In Case You Missed This... 'Shaky Foundations' (HRC's To Be Precise) [View all] WillyT Nov 2015 OP

Read it and wonder why more people aren't talking about it. Awknid Nov 2015 #1

Because it is some screamer's blog ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #3

When Did Harper's Become A Blog ??? WillyT Nov 2015 #5

Look at the link ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #15

harpers is a credible mag and the writers associated the same roguevalley Nov 2015 #66

Go peddle that on Free Republic ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #70

pssst... Your Un-Reality Is Showing... WillyT Nov 2015 #91

You have got to be kidding yourself... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #100

Your nick is "conservative" and you are downing liberals on the DU for supporting a liberal? Hepburn Dec 2015 #123

LOL! bvar22 Nov 2015 #82

And I Have Yet To Understand What The /blog/ Distinction Means... WillyT Nov 2015 #95

Shhhht: the coronation committee is shooting the messenger. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #125

It isn't actionable, yet Demeter Nov 2015 #39

Greenwalded? Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #2

Um... Ken Silverstein Is Not A Fan Of Glenn Greenwald... WillyT Nov 2015 #7

Okay, what about the story he is alking about which has been debunked? Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #12

Wow! NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #4

Ok Nance... Whatever You Say... WillyT Nov 2015 #9

It's not about whatever I have to say ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #17

Do You Know Offhand How Many Of The Watergate Sources Went On The Record Originally... I Don't... WillyT Nov 2015 #20

Changing the subject ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #21

How Is It... "Changing The Subject" ??? WillyT Nov 2015 #25

I think that bringing up Watergate ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #29

Did You Watch "All The President's Men" ??? WillyT Nov 2015 #31

So now Ken Silverstein ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #61

Well... We Will See... Many Papers Refused To Carry The WaPo Stories... For A While... WillyT Nov 2015 #62

Yeah. NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #63

Fair Enough... I'll Bookmark You... You Bookmark Me... WillyT Nov 2015 #64

Remember when "Good citizens check for duplicates"?... SidDithers Nov 2015 #22

Welcome to the New DU ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #24

A.) I Have A Knack For Attracting Views, And... B) This Story Is Just Going To Get Bigger... WillyT Nov 2015 #35

The "knack" for attracting views ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #46

And Why Do You Suppose Anti-HRC Posts Work Here... If They Do ??? WillyT Nov 2015 #55

Simple logic. NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #57

Many people go to auto races just to see the wrecks. (n/t) OilemFirchen Nov 2015 #54

Bring out your dead! randome Nov 2015 #79

Nance, all due respect, but Hillary has chosen to run for the presidency in spite of the fact that JDPriestly Nov 2015 #50

The Republicans have proven themselves ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #56

The Repukes are good at digging up dirt on Hillary because... Hepburn Nov 2015 #69

Ad Hominem again! rhett o rick Nov 2015 #88

I believe this falls under Ad Hominem... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #101

K & R AzDar Nov 2015 #6

Boeing donated $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation... CoffeeCat Nov 2015 #8

Thank You For That !!! WillyT Nov 2015 #10

This sort of thing will just continue to come out Awknid Nov 2015 #11

Yes it will. zeemike Nov 2015 #37

Is there something in which says a company can not donate to a Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #18

There is a very clear trail here... CoffeeCat Nov 2015 #23

So maybe we need to follow other money trails. If the fact everytime a defense contract is voted on Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #26

Unfortunately for you Bernie has never accepted donations or "speaking fees" from Boeing. JonLeibowitz Nov 2015 #38

Can he accept speaking fees? Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #44

Does Sanders have a foundation? zeemike Nov 2015 #41

Does he as a senator have influence to award contracts, yes he is in the position to award contracts Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #103

He has a vote in the Senate like all others. zeemike Nov 2015 #109

The spin like you are doing with the Clinton Foundation. How many billions has been spent on the Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #118

If it is a charity... Docreed2003 Nov 2015 #43

89% goes to program expenses tammywammy Nov 2015 #59

89% to "Program Expenses" ???!!!! bvar22 Nov 2015 #83

Charity Watch gave them an A rating tammywammy Nov 2015 #86

You ask some of the strangest questions. Well of course not. What is considered corrupt rhett o rick Nov 2015 #102

Contact info for the Department of Justice brooklynite Nov 2015 #13

The Clinton's are very adept at adhering to the letter of the law. think Nov 2015 #58

Thanks for posting. Broward Nov 2015 #14

Isn't that something?! nc4bo Nov 2015 #16

How long do you think the GOP would not have been all over this if it was a real story? My, my, Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #28

If you were the GOP JonLeibowitz Nov 2015 #40

Did I release the debunked Clinton released again tonight? Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #47

You keep mentioning this "debunking", bvar22 Nov 2015 #114

Maybe they are waiting to use it in the GE, they can't us it on Bernie, and he can win. bahrbearian Nov 2015 #72

They can use socialism and more stories not even revealed. Right now the GOP wants Sanders in the Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #73

Because the money is the whole point of everything she does: money, and power Demeter Nov 2015 #42

You must have your candidates confused, I know Hillary has donated to charity, has helped others, Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #49

Oh God, this is where the Clintons get sanctimonious and pretend that everyone's out to get them reformist2 Nov 2015 #19

Because the Canadian story has been put to sleep already. The revolving Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #27

My favorite is stalling an investigation for.months or years and then SwampG8r Nov 2015 #32

So no one was "out to get them"? Rose Siding Nov 2015 #34

I agree - the Clintons have always been as pure as the driven snow! reformist2 Nov 2015 #36

More like "driven-in" snow Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #111

They made themselves such easy targets Demeter Nov 2015 #48

Yeah, it's the double super secret stuff that'll get 'em Rose Siding Nov 2015 #52

Don't kid yourself... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #71

You can lay down for Kock and right wing attacks but I won't. Rose Siding Nov 2015 #74

I'm not saying laying down for the kochsuckers... tex-wyo-dem Nov 2015 #77

The "Kochsuckers" helped get Bill Clinton elected. bvar22 Nov 2015 #89

Speaking from firsthand Truprogressive85 Nov 2015 #30

Add the Welfare Deform that shredded the safety net and left 1.5 Million households living on $2/day Demeter Nov 2015 #45

The 1% Serving The 1% cantbeserious Nov 2015 #33

Last paragraph from your link..... postatomic Nov 2015 #51

Just goes to show Demeter Nov 2015 #53

Shifty, shady... SoapBox Nov 2015 #60

Shaky foundations, indeed. OnyxCollie Nov 2015 #65

tl;dr. nt msanthrope Nov 2015 #67

That says more about YOU than the long post. bvar22 Nov 2015 #85

It says that my legal training taught me that if you msanthrope Nov 2015 #87

Your "Legal Training"... Lolololololololol. bvar22 Nov 2015 #94

Dude.... my twitter account in my sig has my real name. Like other lawyers here, msanthrope Nov 2015 #99

Well, for a 'first year intern', you've certainly gotten around. randome Nov 2015 #110

No shit... there was a thread of about four or five of us DU lawyers msanthrope Nov 2015 #113

There you go again. bvar22 Nov 2015 #115

You just got proven incorrect. I understand your frustration. msanthrope Nov 2015 #116

How do you know? bvar22 Nov 2015 #117

I'm adding this to my browser's permanent bookmarks page--wow! and thanks zazen Nov 2015 #75

You are most welcome. OnyxCollie Nov 2015 #78

Thank you for taking the time to put all this information together and posting. /nt think Nov 2015 #80

You're welcome, my friend. nt OnyxCollie Nov 2015 #81

Outstanding! Thank you! n/t Hepburn Dec 2015 #124

Thank you Onyx Collie.... bookmarked nenagh Dec 2015 #129

Clinton Foundation Running Private Equity Fund in Colombia Dems to Win Nov 2015 #68

Finally someone exposes an issue. mmonk Nov 2015 #76

Harpers, huh Babel_17 Nov 2015 #84

Nothing but a smear campaign, many will buy it BootinUp Nov 2015 #90

And Time Will Tell... WillyT Nov 2015 #92

We already know WillyT. The baseless attacks BootinUp Nov 2015 #93

Talk To Me Next September/October... Right Before The Election... WillyT Nov 2015 #96

Sure BootinUp Nov 2015 #97

Hook... Line... And Sinker... WillyT Nov 2015 #98

Charity Navigator has the Clinton Foundation on a watch list Oilwellian Nov 2015 #104

Thank You For That !!! WillyT Nov 2015 #105

You're very welcome Oilwellian Nov 2015 #106

What's the problem? Regarding impropriety, HRC told them to 'cut it out'. sorechasm Nov 2015 #107

This in particular was interesting... Oilwellian Nov 2015 #112

Kick! nt LiberalElite Nov 2015 #108

kick! Segami Nov 2015 #119

Kick! Important information in this thread. senz Nov 2015 #120

Whoops. nc4bo Dec 2015 #121

Kick! artislife Dec 2015 #122

The Depth and Breadth of THIS demonstrates just How BOUGHT Is Our "Democracy" CorporatistNation Dec 2015 #126

Kick! n/t in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #127

Kick... nenagh Dec 2015 #128

Kick! n/t in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #130

kick! n/t in_cog_ni_to Dec 2015 #131