Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zipplewrath

(16,698 posts)
103. Well, sorta
Mon Nov 23, 2015, 08:33 PM
Nov 2015

"single payer" or "medicare for all" can technically be called "insurance", but it isn't by any ordinary model of insurance. On a national level, it just becomes an entitlement program. It's something similar to being "self insured", which is just a fancy way of saying you pay all the bills. It really isn't a "national insurance program" as much as it is a shared risk pool.

But beyond the sematic argument you seem to be pursuing, you're missing the larger point which is that under a medicare for all or single payer, everyone would be "ensured" of receiving health CARE. Under ACA, no such assurance exists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So how much does each individual pay for this? upaloopa Nov 2015 #1
less than the are now restorefreedom Nov 2015 #9
Way out of date info. LynnTTT Nov 2015 #66
Yes, these numbers are very low, hughee99 Nov 2015 #106
The BIGGER QUESTION is how much will CEO's lose? Cosmic Kitten Nov 2015 #10
Well that's what the voters want to know isn't it? upaloopa Nov 2015 #11
Definately a big concern for 4 or 5 of them LiberalLovinLug Nov 2015 #23
You want to know this? JeffHead Nov 2015 #94
It's very troubling DeeDeeNY Nov 2015 #136
Blind party ideology? Dcoast Nov 2015 #160
Bernie is running as a Democrat DeeDeeNY Nov 2015 #165
If I could fave you comment, I would! pinebox Nov 2015 #148
But the socialisms don't work!!!11 pinebox Nov 2015 #155
+1, thanks dreamnightwind Nov 2015 #171
AMEN!!! HEAR, HEAR!!! Moostache Nov 2015 #34
+1 an entire shit load. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #81
And people will use preventative health care instead of waiting until it's so bad they have to go cui bono Nov 2015 #88
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #37
It's a payment system so you can get healthcare. Fantastic Anarchist Nov 2015 #83
And so is the current insurance model ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #85
Well, sorta zipplewrath Nov 2015 #103
Thank you ... he was being obtuse ... Fantastic Anarchist Nov 2015 #134
Good to keep reminding the naysayers of the difference. n/t JimDandy Nov 2015 #170
Insurance CEOs collect unemployment insurance Jarqui Nov 2015 #40
or 'the medical industrial complex'. pansypoo53219 Nov 2015 #101
yes, what about the CHILDREN (I mean trust fund babies given overpaid sinecures)? yurbud Nov 2015 #143
on target mtasselin Nov 2015 #145
Yes, the profits going to Health Ins. Corps take money out of the system, and people sabrina 1 Nov 2015 #149
You will note, the person knew. Android3.14 Nov 2015 #14
Here you go pinebox Nov 2015 #16
So why didn't Bernie push for the 9.5% tax to pay for VT'S single payer? nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #22
As I said earlier pinebox Nov 2015 #25
This was a national issue. Bernie said it was the "model for the nation." SunSeeker Nov 2015 #31
No you're misunderstanding pinebox Nov 2015 #43
As senator, Hillary pushed for funding 911 first responders healthcare and got $21 Billion for NY. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #53
She was using federal money to do it. Not state money. The Vermont plan LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #56
How do you think federal single payer would be funded? SunSeeker Nov 2015 #59
Good pinebox Nov 2015 #77
Why are you attacking the ACA, when it has saved thousands of lives and is a great Dem achievement? SunSeeker Nov 2015 #87
It's a half assed Dem achievement pinebox Nov 2015 #151
We do need to do a lot more. So why would Bernie repeat that state provision? SunSeeker Nov 2015 #153
In fairness ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #46
I have yet to see any quote from Bernie urging Vermonters to support the tax. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #50
I was trying to be polite ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #57
But that is not the VT formula. Aren't you quoting HR 676? nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #61
I know ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #64
That's what I thought. You were quoting HR 676, not VT's law. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #67
Why is Hillary against single-payer? cui bono Nov 2015 #90
Why can't you answer my question? nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #92
Why are you asking the question? n/t cui bono Nov 2015 #109
I asked first. nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #112
Actually ... Here is a good primer on the Bill ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #32
HR 676 is not Bernie's bill. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #96
Under ACA, they are administering insurane coverage right now. eridani Nov 2015 #111
Under the ACA the plans must meet national standards. nt SunSeeker Nov 2015 #113
Yes, standards that suck eridani Nov 2015 #115
No, ACA requires free preventive care, including colonoscopies, without a copay. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #119
If you want to check out a worrisome symptom, that is NOT preventative care eridani Nov 2015 #125
But you will have coverage for illness, with copays. Free dental care is available for the poor. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #127
Chris Christie is already implementing ACA--to the extent that he is willing eridani Nov 2015 #128
The problem with that is: bvar22 Nov 2015 #163
Know what really sucks? SunSeeker Nov 2015 #166
EXACTLY! bvar22 Nov 2015 #167
Hillary got 8 million poor kids covered under CHIP. She knows how to do it. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #168
Good, campaign Boilerplate. bvar22 Nov 2015 #169
IIRC, HR 676 was Kucinich and Conyers Plan. bvar22 Nov 2015 #150
Have you ever had to go without healthcare when you got sick because you couldn't pay? i have! Dont call me Shirley Nov 2015 #36
I pay a shitload into the current system. Beartracks Nov 2015 #84
A lot MaggieD Nov 2015 #99
They're talking about the formula for HR 676, and it's easy. Fuddnik Nov 2015 #100
Do you have an opinion on this issue? Or just here to ask insinuating questions? rhett o rick Nov 2015 #104
I was paying $900/month for catastrophic coverage before I turned 65 eridani Nov 2015 #110
I had one of those rip-off "Catastophic Coverage" Plans too. bvar22 Nov 2015 #161
How much do you or your employer pay for your health insurance now? Cleita Nov 2015 #126
We now pay per capita about twice the average that other developed nations pay. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #132
I'm not going to hold my breath for your apology. Javaman Nov 2015 #162
IT's been know for more than 2 years hootinholler Nov 2015 #2
But the disease profiteers would lose money. nt valerief Nov 2015 #3
Well, then they'll just have to get a second job! KansDem Nov 2015 #6
We can't have that. nt LWolf Nov 2015 #8
Yeah, it will suck not being paid $58,000/day that these Health insurance CEOs rake in. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2015 #24
Including doctors? taught_me_patience Nov 2015 #28
You KNOW I don't mean medical practitioners. They're disease treaters, not disease valerief Nov 2015 #41
Not sure about that. They profit from questionable testing, drugs, surgeries, etc. But I get your Hoyt Nov 2015 #105
Look on the bright side... Moostache Nov 2015 #44
Ha. They pay people to pull their bootstraps. nt valerief Nov 2015 #45
Medicare for all, including dental, optical, hearing aids and mental health services. Scuba Nov 2015 #4
If that takes the place of Medicaid then we are already jwirr Nov 2015 #18
Agreed ... This is a good plan ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #52
Not only can we afford it, we cannot afford not to have it!!! AlbertCat Nov 2015 #60
But Hillary supports the insurance industry and it is her turn. JEB Nov 2015 #5
Sure it is SmittynMo Nov 2015 #65
Here's a link. Wilms Nov 2015 #7
k&r. . . . . . .n/t annabanana Nov 2015 #12
We don't have health care insurance!!! SmittynMo Nov 2015 #13
One thing Andy823 Nov 2015 #15
While true pinebox Nov 2015 #17
FDR used Executive Orders and the bully pulpit heavily when he implemented the New Deal AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #51
Bernies says he must take it to the people. Get them informed on the savings. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #82
but then Americans would like it, and get mad at the people who'd blocked it for so long, and they MisterP Nov 2015 #19
Bernie needs to work this info in all his speeches moving forward. SmittynMo Nov 2015 #20
Expanding medicare and removing the wealth cap d_legendary1 Nov 2015 #21
Speaking from the Great White North LiberalLovinLug Nov 2015 #26
The Great White North does not listen to Fox News 24/7. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #62
Here's the problem with America and health care pinebox Nov 2015 #156
What is the impact to doctor pay? taught_me_patience Nov 2015 #27
If she is a specialist, she might make too much money. If she is a GP, probably not enough. randys1 Nov 2015 #30
It might affect her revenue ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #54
Doctors in other countries TM99 Nov 2015 #58
They probably don't invest 350k into their own business taught_me_patience Nov 2015 #68
They certainly don't have the education loan debt TM99 Nov 2015 #73
Link? randys1 Nov 2015 #29
Oh come on.....rather demanding aren't you? George II Nov 2015 #35
I assumed it was on oversight, why would the OP intentionally leave it out? randys1 Nov 2015 #39
I guess because it is not actually describing Bernie's plan and they want to imply it is. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #95
You might wish to know Thespian2 Nov 2015 #118
I'm sure none of your provinces are run by Sam Brownback or Chris Christie types. SunSeeker Nov 2015 #120
You're right... Thespian2 Nov 2015 #121
I would support that as long as the current 20% co-pay is eliminated. totodeinhere Nov 2015 #33
20% medicare copay? I am not familiar with the details, is that what the randys1 Nov 2015 #42
Yes, that is correct. That's what a Medigap policy will pay. If you are poor enough totodeinhere Nov 2015 #74
So , if you know, the 20% is for hospital stays only? randys1 Nov 2015 #78
The co-pay doesn't apply to hospital stays. jeff47 Nov 2015 #49
OK, thanks for the correction. But you get my point. 20% of a doctor's bill can be a lot totodeinhere Nov 2015 #75
The structure of the Bill calls for eliminating deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #55
Thanks. Then that would address my concerns. n/t totodeinhere Nov 2015 #76
But the very wealthy would lose money, and making rich people richer is the most important valerief Nov 2015 #38
"Job creators" PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #47
The Health Insurance Industry... bvar22 Nov 2015 #70
+1 Absolutely. BeanMusical Nov 2015 #138
But Trumps kids might get it too! AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #48
K & R! SoapBox Nov 2015 #63
It would be wonderful. Too bad so many democrats don't want want it. Autumn Nov 2015 #69
You want that. I want that. MineralMan Nov 2015 #71
So do I! So do I! So let's get busy! n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2015 #79
The Democrats we elected in 2008 didn't even try bread_and_roses Nov 2015 #89
I don't believe that. Not for a moment. nt Romulox Nov 2015 #91
Bullshit. 99Forever Nov 2015 #137
HR 676 bkkyosemite Nov 2015 #72
K&R! There is no good argument against adopting single payer in the USA. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #80
kick Angry Dragon Nov 2015 #86
Hillary-style "progressives" are whining about their taxes possibly going up. nt Romulox Nov 2015 #93
LINK: Triana Nov 2015 #97
It's not a new study, which is why you left out the link, right? MaggieD Nov 2015 #98
but .. but .. the poor, "given" good health will just squander it. /s/nt NCjack Nov 2015 #102
Save billions for working people, sure Doctor_J Nov 2015 #107
And some people in the Democratic Party are against this why? blackspade Nov 2015 #108
K&R CharlotteVale Nov 2015 #114
Kick! nt LiberalElite Nov 2015 #116
K&R. I've certainly wanted this for decades now. Overseas Nov 2015 #117
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Nov 2015 #122
Yours is an excellent post also! -none Nov 2015 #141
And we're already paying into it now, it wouldnt be much of an adjustment 7962 Nov 2015 #123
This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP Nov 2015 #124
Private insurance takes in $960B and pays out $850B Recursion Nov 2015 #129
Yes it would cover all, but it's not "savings" to pay a provider... MadDAsHell Nov 2015 #130
Bookmarked! Thanks. K&R. JDPriestly Nov 2015 #131
Medicare is NOT single payer. It contains aspects of Single Payer, but strickly speaking it isn't still_one Nov 2015 #133
K&R nt raouldukelives Nov 2015 #135
Kick and R BeanMusical Nov 2015 #139
Canada covers everybody...... WcoastO Nov 2015 #140
We just don't understand Universal Heathcare MonteSS Nov 2015 #142
The German system I am familar with pinebox Nov 2015 #157
Low overhead, no profit taking, even coverage, no games senz Nov 2015 #144
BIG K and R n/t 99th_Monkey Nov 2015 #146
Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" Award rocktivity Nov 2015 #147
The only problem is trickle down socialism doesn't work. moobu2 Nov 2015 #152
"Trickle down socialism"? Are you a nutter? pinebox Nov 2015 #154
It wont work because Bernie Sanders can not get elected. moobu2 Nov 2015 #158
Oh ok so just give up and forget fighting for something? Quite the strategy pinebox Nov 2015 #159
That might come in handy for all the ex-insurance employees dumped onto the job market. Orsino Nov 2015 #164
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»‘Medicare for All’ would ...»Reply #103