Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: ‘Medicare for All’ would cover everyone, save billions in first year: new study [View all]zipplewrath
(16,698 posts)103. Well, sorta
"single payer" or "medicare for all" can technically be called "insurance", but it isn't by any ordinary model of insurance. On a national level, it just becomes an entitlement program. It's something similar to being "self insured", which is just a fancy way of saying you pay all the bills. It really isn't a "national insurance program" as much as it is a shared risk pool.
But beyond the sematic argument you seem to be pursuing, you're missing the larger point which is that under a medicare for all or single payer, everyone would be "ensured" of receiving health CARE. Under ACA, no such assurance exists.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
‘Medicare for All’ would cover everyone, save billions in first year: new study [View all]
pinebox
Nov 2015
OP
And people will use preventative health care instead of waiting until it's so bad they have to go
cui bono
Nov 2015
#88
yes, what about the CHILDREN (I mean trust fund babies given overpaid sinecures)?
yurbud
Nov 2015
#143
Yes, the profits going to Health Ins. Corps take money out of the system, and people
sabrina 1
Nov 2015
#149
As senator, Hillary pushed for funding 911 first responders healthcare and got $21 Billion for NY.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#53
Why are you attacking the ACA, when it has saved thousands of lives and is a great Dem achievement?
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#87
We do need to do a lot more. So why would Bernie repeat that state provision?
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#153
I have yet to see any quote from Bernie urging Vermonters to support the tax.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#50
No, ACA requires free preventive care, including colonoscopies, without a copay.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#119
But you will have coverage for illness, with copays. Free dental care is available for the poor.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#127
Have you ever had to go without healthcare when you got sick because you couldn't pay? i have!
Dont call me Shirley
Nov 2015
#36
Do you have an opinion on this issue? Or just here to ask insinuating questions?
rhett o rick
Nov 2015
#104
We now pay per capita about twice the average that other developed nations pay.
JDPriestly
Nov 2015
#132
Yeah, it will suck not being paid $58,000/day that these Health insurance CEOs rake in.
SammyWinstonJack
Nov 2015
#24
You KNOW I don't mean medical practitioners. They're disease treaters, not disease
valerief
Nov 2015
#41
Not sure about that. They profit from questionable testing, drugs, surgeries, etc. But I get your
Hoyt
Nov 2015
#105
Medicare for all, including dental, optical, hearing aids and mental health services.
Scuba
Nov 2015
#4
FDR used Executive Orders and the bully pulpit heavily when he implemented the New Deal
AgingAmerican
Nov 2015
#51
Bernies says he must take it to the people. Get them informed on the savings.
Enthusiast
Nov 2015
#82
but then Americans would like it, and get mad at the people who'd blocked it for so long, and they
MisterP
Nov 2015
#19
If she is a specialist, she might make too much money. If she is a GP, probably not enough.
randys1
Nov 2015
#30
I guess because it is not actually describing Bernie's plan and they want to imply it is.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#95
I'm sure none of your provinces are run by Sam Brownback or Chris Christie types.
SunSeeker
Nov 2015
#120
Yes, that is correct. That's what a Medigap policy will pay. If you are poor enough
totodeinhere
Nov 2015
#74
OK, thanks for the correction. But you get my point. 20% of a doctor's bill can be a lot
totodeinhere
Nov 2015
#75
The structure of the Bill calls for eliminating deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, ...
1StrongBlackMan
Nov 2015
#55
But the very wealthy would lose money, and making rich people richer is the most important
valerief
Nov 2015
#38
Hillary-style "progressives" are whining about their taxes possibly going up. nt
Romulox
Nov 2015
#93